Dissociations in the interpretation of modernity in the city
Descripción del Articulo
Modernity has interested various intellectuals from various disciplines, including those who are responsible for the design of buildings. However, how was it interpreted to be materialized is perceived as such? The growth of Lima real estate market has promoted the construction of new buildings with...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2022 |
Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:revistaspuc:article/24282 |
Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/24282 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Modern City Streets Facades Moderno Ciudad Calles Fachadas |
id |
REVPUCP_b69f7726f9b6c3c9a2a642ec85b94c02 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistaspuc:article/24282 |
network_acronym_str |
REVPUCP |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Dissociations in the interpretation of modernity in the cityDisociaciones en la interpretación de lo moderno en la ciudadCórdova-Ramírez, MiguelModernCityStreetsFacadesModernoCiudadCallesFachadasModernity has interested various intellectuals from various disciplines, including those who are responsible for the design of buildings. However, how was it interpreted to be materialized is perceived as such? The growth of Lima real estate market has promoted the construction of new buildings with the largest offer in the south and southwest areas of the city, these so-called modern buildings are gradually replacing the pre-existing ones. Through a qualitative study, two streets with antagonistic facades in Lince, Jesus Maria and Santa Beatriz neighborhoods were compared to investigate how young adults interpreted this change in the city. It was revealed that their interpretation of modern was dissociated from what promoters put forward and a questioning of modern as a synonymous of progress for the city. It is concluded that building modern buildings does not make a modern city and to improve it, first, it is necessary to question if modernization is necessary.La modernidad ha interesado a diversos intelectuales de distintas disciplinas, entre ellos los que se encargan del diseño de los edificios. Sin embargo, ¿la manera en la que se interpretó para ser materializada es percibida como tal? El crecimiento del mercado inmobiliario limeño ha promovido la construcción de nuevos edificios cuya mayor oferta corresponde a la zona sur y suroeste de la ciudad. Estos edificios, denominados como ‘modernos’, vienen reemplazando paulatinamente a los prexistentes. Mediante un estudio cualitativo, se compararon dos calles con fachadas antagónicas de los barrios de Lince, Jesús María y Santa Beatriz para indagar cómo los jóvenes adultos interpretaban este cambio en la ciudad. Se reveló que su interpretación de lo moderno se disociaba de lo expuesto por sus promotores y se cuestionaba lo moderno como sinónimo de progreso para la ciudad. Se concluye que construir edificios modernos no hace una ciudad moderna, y para mejorarla, se requiere cuestionar primero si el camino de la modernización es necesario.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2022-12-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/2428210.18800/debatesensociologia.202202.003Debates en Sociología; Núm. 55 (2022): Varia; 61-822304-42840254-9220reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/24282/24783Derechos de autor 2022 Miguel Córdova-Ramírezhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistaspuc:article/242822023-07-24T16:20:28Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Dissociations in the interpretation of modernity in the city Disociaciones en la interpretación de lo moderno en la ciudad |
title |
Dissociations in the interpretation of modernity in the city |
spellingShingle |
Dissociations in the interpretation of modernity in the city Córdova-Ramírez, Miguel Modern City Streets Facades Moderno Ciudad Calles Fachadas |
title_short |
Dissociations in the interpretation of modernity in the city |
title_full |
Dissociations in the interpretation of modernity in the city |
title_fullStr |
Dissociations in the interpretation of modernity in the city |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dissociations in the interpretation of modernity in the city |
title_sort |
Dissociations in the interpretation of modernity in the city |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Córdova-Ramírez, Miguel |
author |
Córdova-Ramírez, Miguel |
author_facet |
Córdova-Ramírez, Miguel |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Modern City Streets Facades Moderno Ciudad Calles Fachadas |
topic |
Modern City Streets Facades Moderno Ciudad Calles Fachadas |
description |
Modernity has interested various intellectuals from various disciplines, including those who are responsible for the design of buildings. However, how was it interpreted to be materialized is perceived as such? The growth of Lima real estate market has promoted the construction of new buildings with the largest offer in the south and southwest areas of the city, these so-called modern buildings are gradually replacing the pre-existing ones. Through a qualitative study, two streets with antagonistic facades in Lince, Jesus Maria and Santa Beatriz neighborhoods were compared to investigate how young adults interpreted this change in the city. It was revealed that their interpretation of modern was dissociated from what promoters put forward and a questioning of modern as a synonymous of progress for the city. It is concluded that building modern buildings does not make a modern city and to improve it, first, it is necessary to question if modernization is necessary. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-12 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/24282 10.18800/debatesensociologia.202202.003 |
url |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/24282 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18800/debatesensociologia.202202.003 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/24282/24783 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2022 Miguel Córdova-Ramírez http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2022 Miguel Córdova-Ramírez http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Debates en Sociología; Núm. 55 (2022): Varia; 61-82 2304-4284 0254-9220 reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instacron:PUCP |
instname_str |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
instacron_str |
PUCP |
institution |
PUCP |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
collection |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1836736775963279360 |
score |
13.952244 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).