From Condemnation to Cooperation: The Evolution of China’s Position toward UN Peacekeeping Operations

Descripción del Articulo

In its capacity as a great power, China has assumed greater responsibilities regarding the provision of global public goods. Therefore, it has become the UN Security Council’s permanent member which contributes the largest amount of troops to peacekeeping operations. Consequently, China has steadily...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Chávez Mazuelos, Jorge Antonio
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2023
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27688
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/agendainternacional/article/view/27688
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:UN Peacekeeping Operations
China
International Security
Chinese Foreign Policy
Operaciones de Paz de la ONU
Seguridad Internacional
Política Exterior China
id REVPUCP_a6003a3d5da04b6ae123be8623a05468
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/27688
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling From Condemnation to Cooperation: The Evolution of China’s Position toward UN Peacekeeping OperationsDe la condena a la cooperación: la evolución de la posición de China hacia las operaciones de mantenimiento de la paz de la ONUChávez Mazuelos, Jorge AntonioUN Peacekeeping OperationsChinaInternational SecurityChinese Foreign PolicyOperaciones de Paz de la ONUChinaSeguridad InternacionalPolítica Exterior ChinaIn its capacity as a great power, China has assumed greater responsibilities regarding the provision of global public goods. Therefore, it has become the UN Security Council’s permanent member which contributes the largest amount of troops to peacekeeping operations. Consequently, China has steadily increased its financial contributions and registered an 8.000 peacekeeping stand-by force. Nonetheless, China’s current leadership in the field of peacekeeping operations differs radically from its initial rejection for missions which it regarded as imperialist instruments destined to undermine the progress of revolutionary movements and weaken the principle of sovereignty. Therefore, in this article, I will explain the evolution of China’s stance toward UN PKOs from an outright rejection to a moderate opposition, and from a limited support to an active participation. Furthermore, I will explain how PKOs enable China to protect its national interests in conflict zones and upgrade its military capabilities through military operations other than war. (MOOTW). Finally, I will explain that this stance is the reflection of evolving national conception roles and of a more ambitious Chinese foreign policy; through which Beijing seeks to strengthen international cooperation, safeguard its interests and nationals overseas, redefine international norms and global governance schemes and reaffirm its great power status.En su calidad de gran potencia, China ha asumido mayores responsabilidades en la provisión de bienes públicos globales. Por ello, es el miembro permanente del Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU que contribuye con más tropas a las operaciones de mantenimiento de la paz de dicha organización, habiendo incrementado sus contribuciones financieras sostenidamente y registrado una fuerza de reserva consistente en 8000 efectivos. Sin embargo, el actual liderazgo de China en las OMPs difiere radicalmente de su rechazo inicial por misiones que consideraba como instrumentos imperialistas destinados a cortar el avance de movimientos revolucionarios y debilitar el principio de soberanía. En el presente artículo explicaré la evolución de la posición china en relación a las OPMs de una condena férrea a una oposición moderada, y de un apoyo limitado a una participación activa. Asimismo, señalaré como las OMPs permiten a China proteger sus intereses nacionales en zonas de conflicto y desarrollar sus capacidades a través de operaciones militares diferentes a la guerra (MOOTW). Finalmente señalaré que esta posición es reflejo de concepciones de roles nacionales que han variado y de una política exterior china más ambiciosa que busca fortalecer la cooperación internacional, cautelar sus intereses fundamentales, redefinir normas internacionales y esquemas de gobernanza global y reafirmar su estatus de gran potencia.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2023-11-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/agendainternacional/article/view/27688Agenda Internacional; Vol. 30 Núm. 41 (2023); 72-932311-57181027-6750reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPenghttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/agendainternacional/article/view/27688/25768info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/276882024-06-28T17:30:24Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv From Condemnation to Cooperation: The Evolution of China’s Position toward UN Peacekeeping Operations
De la condena a la cooperación: la evolución de la posición de China hacia las operaciones de mantenimiento de la paz de la ONU
title From Condemnation to Cooperation: The Evolution of China’s Position toward UN Peacekeeping Operations
spellingShingle From Condemnation to Cooperation: The Evolution of China’s Position toward UN Peacekeeping Operations
Chávez Mazuelos, Jorge Antonio
UN Peacekeeping Operations
China
International Security
Chinese Foreign Policy
Operaciones de Paz de la ONU
China
Seguridad Internacional
Política Exterior China
title_short From Condemnation to Cooperation: The Evolution of China’s Position toward UN Peacekeeping Operations
title_full From Condemnation to Cooperation: The Evolution of China’s Position toward UN Peacekeeping Operations
title_fullStr From Condemnation to Cooperation: The Evolution of China’s Position toward UN Peacekeeping Operations
title_full_unstemmed From Condemnation to Cooperation: The Evolution of China’s Position toward UN Peacekeeping Operations
title_sort From Condemnation to Cooperation: The Evolution of China’s Position toward UN Peacekeeping Operations
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Chávez Mazuelos, Jorge Antonio
author Chávez Mazuelos, Jorge Antonio
author_facet Chávez Mazuelos, Jorge Antonio
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv UN Peacekeeping Operations
China
International Security
Chinese Foreign Policy
Operaciones de Paz de la ONU
China
Seguridad Internacional
Política Exterior China
topic UN Peacekeeping Operations
China
International Security
Chinese Foreign Policy
Operaciones de Paz de la ONU
China
Seguridad Internacional
Política Exterior China
description In its capacity as a great power, China has assumed greater responsibilities regarding the provision of global public goods. Therefore, it has become the UN Security Council’s permanent member which contributes the largest amount of troops to peacekeeping operations. Consequently, China has steadily increased its financial contributions and registered an 8.000 peacekeeping stand-by force. Nonetheless, China’s current leadership in the field of peacekeeping operations differs radically from its initial rejection for missions which it regarded as imperialist instruments destined to undermine the progress of revolutionary movements and weaken the principle of sovereignty. Therefore, in this article, I will explain the evolution of China’s stance toward UN PKOs from an outright rejection to a moderate opposition, and from a limited support to an active participation. Furthermore, I will explain how PKOs enable China to protect its national interests in conflict zones and upgrade its military capabilities through military operations other than war. (MOOTW). Finally, I will explain that this stance is the reflection of evolving national conception roles and of a more ambitious Chinese foreign policy; through which Beijing seeks to strengthen international cooperation, safeguard its interests and nationals overseas, redefine international norms and global governance schemes and reaffirm its great power status.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-11-15
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/agendainternacional/article/view/27688
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/agendainternacional/article/view/27688
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/agendainternacional/article/view/27688/25768
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Agenda Internacional; Vol. 30 Núm. 41 (2023); 72-93
2311-5718
1027-6750
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1846609519874932736
score 13.92416
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).