Civil Law Versus Binding Judicial Precedent: Dialogues with Academics from (Latin) America and Europe

Descripción del Articulo

This paper addresses binding judicial precedent. The semi- structured interview was used as a methodology for execution and a total of thirty-two academics, from ten countries in Latin America and Europe, participated of it. The results are structured around the arguments for and against precedent a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Castro, Jordi Delgado, Díaz García, Luis Iván
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2021
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22663
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22663
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Judicial precedent
Precedent application
Precedent in civil law
Precedent in common law
Precedente judicial
Seguimiento del precedente
Precedente en el derecho civil
Precedente en el common law
id REVPUCP_a545129b26ffccfb9e83f8a1b99c26a5
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/22663
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling Civil Law Versus Binding Judicial Precedent: Dialogues with Academics from (Latin) America and EuropeEl civil law frente al precedente judicial vinculante: diálogos con académicos de América Latina y EuropaCastro, Jordi DelgadoDíaz García, Luis IvánJudicial precedentPrecedent applicationPrecedent in civil lawPrecedent in common lawPrecedente judicialSeguimiento del precedentePrecedente en el derecho civilPrecedente en el common lawThis paper addresses binding judicial precedent. The semi- structured interview was used as a methodology for execution and a total of thirty-two academics, from ten countries in Latin America and Europe, participated of it. The results are structured around the arguments for and against precedent as a theoretical position; to narrate how vertex courts and inferior courts behave on precedents; and finally, to know the roadblocks that prevent following precedent correctly.El presente trabajo aborda el tema del precedente judicial vinculante. Para su ejecución, se usó como metodología la entrevista semiestructurada, participando de ella un total de treinta y dos académicos de diez países de América Latina y Europa. Los resultados se estructuran en torno a los argumentos a favor y en contra del precedente como posición teórica; a narrar cómo se comportan los tribunales vértice y el resto frente a los precedentes; y, finalmente, a conocer los obstáculos que impiden seguir correctamente los precedentes.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2021-11-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/epub+ziphttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22663Derecho PUCP; No. 87 (2021): Dialogues between the Civil Law system and the Common Law; 105-138Derecho PUCP; Núm. 87 (2021): Diálogos entre el sistema de Derecho Civil y el Common Law; 105-138Derecho PUCP; n. 87 (2021): Diálogos entre el sistema de Derecho Civil y el Common Law; 105-1382305-25460251-3420reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22663/23229http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22663/23500http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22663/23501Derechos de autor 2021 Jordi Delgado Castro, Luis Iván Díaz Garcíainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/226632025-01-14T17:29:29Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Civil Law Versus Binding Judicial Precedent: Dialogues with Academics from (Latin) America and Europe
El civil law frente al precedente judicial vinculante: diálogos con académicos de América Latina y Europa
title Civil Law Versus Binding Judicial Precedent: Dialogues with Academics from (Latin) America and Europe
spellingShingle Civil Law Versus Binding Judicial Precedent: Dialogues with Academics from (Latin) America and Europe
Castro, Jordi Delgado
Judicial precedent
Precedent application
Precedent in civil law
Precedent in common law
Precedente judicial
Seguimiento del precedente
Precedente en el derecho civil
Precedente en el common law
title_short Civil Law Versus Binding Judicial Precedent: Dialogues with Academics from (Latin) America and Europe
title_full Civil Law Versus Binding Judicial Precedent: Dialogues with Academics from (Latin) America and Europe
title_fullStr Civil Law Versus Binding Judicial Precedent: Dialogues with Academics from (Latin) America and Europe
title_full_unstemmed Civil Law Versus Binding Judicial Precedent: Dialogues with Academics from (Latin) America and Europe
title_sort Civil Law Versus Binding Judicial Precedent: Dialogues with Academics from (Latin) America and Europe
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Castro, Jordi Delgado
Díaz García, Luis Iván
author Castro, Jordi Delgado
author_facet Castro, Jordi Delgado
Díaz García, Luis Iván
author_role author
author2 Díaz García, Luis Iván
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Judicial precedent
Precedent application
Precedent in civil law
Precedent in common law
Precedente judicial
Seguimiento del precedente
Precedente en el derecho civil
Precedente en el common law
topic Judicial precedent
Precedent application
Precedent in civil law
Precedent in common law
Precedente judicial
Seguimiento del precedente
Precedente en el derecho civil
Precedente en el common law
description This paper addresses binding judicial precedent. The semi- structured interview was used as a methodology for execution and a total of thirty-two academics, from ten countries in Latin America and Europe, participated of it. The results are structured around the arguments for and against precedent as a theoretical position; to narrate how vertex courts and inferior courts behave on precedents; and finally, to know the roadblocks that prevent following precedent correctly.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-11-25
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22663
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22663
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22663/23229
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22663/23500
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22663/23501
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Jordi Delgado Castro, Luis Iván Díaz García
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2021 Jordi Delgado Castro, Luis Iván Díaz García
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
application/epub+zip
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Derecho PUCP; No. 87 (2021): Dialogues between the Civil Law system and the Common Law; 105-138
Derecho PUCP; Núm. 87 (2021): Diálogos entre el sistema de Derecho Civil y el Common Law; 105-138
Derecho PUCP; n. 87 (2021): Diálogos entre el sistema de Derecho Civil y el Common Law; 105-138
2305-2546
0251-3420
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1841536520183349248
score 13.966568
Civil Law Versus Binding Judicial Precedent: Dialogues with Academics from (Latin) America and Europe
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).

Ejemplares Similares