The Antithesis of the Accusatory System. A proposal on the regulation of the Informal and Justified preventive prison towards a digital justice and according to the Human rights

Descripción del Articulo

Last August of this year, the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, through the Law School, by initiative of the College of Professors of Criminal Law, in response to the suspension of academic activities, as a result of the pandemic that afflicts the world arising from the SARS-Cov2 virus, takin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Solís Buitrón, Victor Manuel
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:inglés
español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23148
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/23148
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Derecho penal
Prisión preventiva
Presunción de inocencia
Sistema acusatorio
Prisión preventiva oficiosa
Criminal Law
Preventive prison
Presumption of innocence
Accusatory system
Informal preventive prison
id REVPUCP_a1ef5fc515df531df2b703820b953bce
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23148
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Antithesis of the Accusatory System. A proposal on the regulation of the Informal and Justified preventive prison towards a digital justice and according to the Human rights
La Antítesis del Sistema Acusatorio. Una propuesta sobre la regulación de la Prisión Preventiva Oficiosa y Justificada hacia una justicia digital y acorde a los Derechos Humanos
title The Antithesis of the Accusatory System. A proposal on the regulation of the Informal and Justified preventive prison towards a digital justice and according to the Human rights
spellingShingle The Antithesis of the Accusatory System. A proposal on the regulation of the Informal and Justified preventive prison towards a digital justice and according to the Human rights
Solís Buitrón, Victor Manuel
Derecho penal
Prisión preventiva
Presunción de inocencia
Sistema acusatorio
Prisión preventiva oficiosa
Criminal Law
Preventive prison
Presumption of innocence
Accusatory system
Informal preventive prison
title_short The Antithesis of the Accusatory System. A proposal on the regulation of the Informal and Justified preventive prison towards a digital justice and according to the Human rights
title_full The Antithesis of the Accusatory System. A proposal on the regulation of the Informal and Justified preventive prison towards a digital justice and according to the Human rights
title_fullStr The Antithesis of the Accusatory System. A proposal on the regulation of the Informal and Justified preventive prison towards a digital justice and according to the Human rights
title_full_unstemmed The Antithesis of the Accusatory System. A proposal on the regulation of the Informal and Justified preventive prison towards a digital justice and according to the Human rights
title_sort The Antithesis of the Accusatory System. A proposal on the regulation of the Informal and Justified preventive prison towards a digital justice and according to the Human rights
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Solís Buitrón, Victor Manuel
author Solís Buitrón, Victor Manuel
author_facet Solís Buitrón, Victor Manuel
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Derecho penal
Prisión preventiva
Presunción de inocencia
Sistema acusatorio
Prisión preventiva oficiosa
Criminal Law
Preventive prison
Presumption of innocence
Accusatory system
Informal preventive prison
topic Derecho penal
Prisión preventiva
Presunción de inocencia
Sistema acusatorio
Prisión preventiva oficiosa
Criminal Law
Preventive prison
Presumption of innocence
Accusatory system
Informal preventive prison
description Last August of this year, the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, through the Law School, by initiative of the College of Professors of Criminal Law, in response to the suspension of academic activities, as a result of the pandemic that afflicts the world arising from the SARS-Cov2 virus, taking advantage of digital platforms available to people at this time as a tool to use to communicate at a distance, organized the First International Virtual Congress of Criminal Law. In this event, more than 130 academics from different Latin American Universities participated as speakers, who presented on topics of the criminal legal reality, both substantive and adjective, in the panels that were organized by themes that addressed different concepts in these specialties. The Congress was embellished by Magisterial Conferences issued by Masters Emeritus and Deans of the Faculty of Law of the UNAM and other law schools of invited countries.The importance of the Congress surprised the Academic Forum, almost twenty thousand people registered and approximately two million of them accessed the event that was transmitted and broadcast on social networks through the Facebook platform “Live streaming”. From the approaches that were most emphasized in the presentations, the concern of the present article is born. Specifically, it highlights concerns about exercise, it highlights the concern about the arbitrary exercise of criminal law due to its punitive nature and the importance of limiting the excess in its application, respecting in general the human rights of individuals and, in particular, those recognized for the parties in the procedural rules, this in equity with the Fundamental Principles of the Prosecution Systems in the accusatory model, already adopted in practically all democratic countries in Latin America. This highlights the need for a new definition of preventive prison, conceived now as a precautionary measure and its intimate relation with the principle of the “Presumption of Innocence”, in whose application there must be absolute communion, a necessary condition in order to have a profound and definitive vision in the protection of Human rights. Puede conocer los comentarios del autor/a sobre el artículo aquí: https://youtu.be/wIBwCxq31kk  
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-23
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/23148
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/23148
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
spa
language eng
spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/23148/22163
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/23148/22164
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/23148/22165
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/23148/22278
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
application/epub+zip
application/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv IUS ET VERITAS; No. 61 (2020); 276-285
IUS ET VERITAS; Núm. 61 (2020); 276-285
IUS ET VERITAS; No. 61 (2020); 276-285
IUS ET VERITAS; N. 61 (2020); 276-285
IUS ET VERITAS; n. 61 (2020); 276-285
1995-2929
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1853585541858066432
spelling The Antithesis of the Accusatory System. A proposal on the regulation of the Informal and Justified preventive prison towards a digital justice and according to the Human rightsLa Antítesis del Sistema Acusatorio. Una propuesta sobre la regulación de la Prisión Preventiva Oficiosa y Justificada hacia una justicia digital y acorde a los Derechos HumanosSolís Buitrón, Victor ManuelDerecho penalPrisión preventivaPresunción de inocenciaSistema acusatorioPrisión preventiva oficiosaCriminal LawPreventive prisonPresumption of innocenceAccusatory systemInformal preventive prisonLast August of this year, the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, through the Law School, by initiative of the College of Professors of Criminal Law, in response to the suspension of academic activities, as a result of the pandemic that afflicts the world arising from the SARS-Cov2 virus, taking advantage of digital platforms available to people at this time as a tool to use to communicate at a distance, organized the First International Virtual Congress of Criminal Law. In this event, more than 130 academics from different Latin American Universities participated as speakers, who presented on topics of the criminal legal reality, both substantive and adjective, in the panels that were organized by themes that addressed different concepts in these specialties. The Congress was embellished by Magisterial Conferences issued by Masters Emeritus and Deans of the Faculty of Law of the UNAM and other law schools of invited countries.The importance of the Congress surprised the Academic Forum, almost twenty thousand people registered and approximately two million of them accessed the event that was transmitted and broadcast on social networks through the Facebook platform “Live streaming”. From the approaches that were most emphasized in the presentations, the concern of the present article is born. Specifically, it highlights concerns about exercise, it highlights the concern about the arbitrary exercise of criminal law due to its punitive nature and the importance of limiting the excess in its application, respecting in general the human rights of individuals and, in particular, those recognized for the parties in the procedural rules, this in equity with the Fundamental Principles of the Prosecution Systems in the accusatory model, already adopted in practically all democratic countries in Latin America. This highlights the need for a new definition of preventive prison, conceived now as a precautionary measure and its intimate relation with the principle of the “Presumption of Innocence”, in whose application there must be absolute communion, a necessary condition in order to have a profound and definitive vision in the protection of Human rights. Puede conocer los comentarios del autor/a sobre el artículo aquí: https://youtu.be/wIBwCxq31kk  El pasado mes de agosto del presente año, la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, a través de la Facultad de Derecho, por iniciativa del Colegio de Profesores de Derecho Penal, atendiendo a la suspensión de actividades académicas como consecuencia de la pandemia que aqueja al mundo derivado del virus SARS-Cov2, aprovechando las plataformas digitales al alcance de las personas en estos momentos tan socorridas como instrumentos de uso para comunicarnos a distancia, organizó el Primer Congreso Virtual Internacional de Derecho Penal.En este evento participaron más de 130 académicos de diferentes Universidades de Iberoamérica en calidad de ponentes, quienes expusieron sobre temas de la realidad jurídica penal, sustantiva y adjetiva, en las mesas que se organizaron por temáticas que abordaron diferentes conceptos de estas especialidades. El Congreso fue engalanado por Conferencias Magistrales emitidas por Maestros Eméritos y Decanos de la Facultad de Derecho de la UNAM y de otras escuelas de Derecho de países invitados. La trascendencia del Congreso sorprendió al Foro Académico, casi veinte mil personas inscritas y aproximadamente dos millones de ellas accedieron al evento que fue transmitido y difundido en redes sociales a través de la plataforma Facebook Live Streaming. De los planteamientos que más destacaron en las ponencias nace la inquietud del presente artículo. Específicamente resalta la preocupación al respecto del ejercicio arbitrario del derecho penal por su naturaleza punitiva y la importancia de limitar el exceso en su aplicación respetando en forma general los Derechos Humanos de las personas y de manera particular los reconocidos a las partes en las reglas procesales, esto en equidad con los Principios Fundamentales de los Sistemas de Enjuiciamiento en el modelo acusatorio, adoptados prácticamente ya en todos los países democráticos en América Latina. Puede conocer los comentarios del autor/a sobre el artículo aquí: https://youtu.be/wIBwCxq31kk  Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2020-12-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/epub+zipapplication/xmlhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/23148IUS ET VERITAS; No. 61 (2020); 276-285IUS ET VERITAS; Núm. 61 (2020); 276-285IUS ET VERITAS; No. 61 (2020); 276-285IUS ET VERITAS; N. 61 (2020); 276-285IUS ET VERITAS; n. 61 (2020); 276-2851995-2929reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPengspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/23148/22163http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/23148/22164http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/23148/22165http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/23148/22278https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/231482024-02-01T15:35:27Z
score 13.070136
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).