Dignity According to the Subject. Three Possible Meanings in Conventionality Control
Descripción del Articulo
This paper presents three categories in which the notion of dignity can be used in jurisprudence, depending on the subject to which it is ascribed: as institutional status, as a characteristic of the human being and as a characterization of other elements. In each one of the types, in the first plac...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2021 |
| Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistaspuc:article/22967 |
| Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22967 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Dignity Subject Inter-American Court of Human Rights Concept Semantics Dignidad Sujeto Corte IDH Concepto Semántica |
| id |
REVPUCP_7a91f53c032c6479ff20ba2e45b5f3f6 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistaspuc:article/22967 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVPUCP |
| network_name_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Dignity According to the Subject. Three Possible Meanings in Conventionality ControlLa dignidad en función del sujeto. Tres posibles sentidos para un control de convencionalidadLell, Helga MaríaDignitySubjectInter-American Court of Human RightsConceptSemanticsDignidadSujetoCorte IDHConceptoSemánticaThis paper presents three categories in which the notion of dignity can be used in jurisprudence, depending on the subject to which it is ascribed: as institutional status, as a characteristic of the human being and as a characterization of other elements. In each one of the types, in the first place, a theoretical explanation is made that, although brief, tries to introduce some characteristics about the respective meaning. Second, it describes how the Inter-American Court of Human Rights has used the term «dignity» in the respective sense; that is, a review of the casuistry is included. Finally, some ideas are discussed. The methodology has been analytical regarding the use of the concept and is based on an analysis of the contentious cases and theadvisory opinions of the mentioned institution.Este trabajo expone tres categorías de uso de la noción de dignidad en función del sujeto: como estatus institucional, como nota propia del ser humano y como caracterización de otros elementos. En cada uno de los tipos, en primer lugar, se realiza una explicación teórica que, si bien es breve, pretende introducir algunas características sobre el respectivo sentido. En segundo término, se describe cómo la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos ha utilizado el término «dignidad» en el respectivo sentido; es decir, se incluye una revisión de la casuística. Finalmente, se comentan algunas reflexiones. La metodología ha sido analítica respecto al uso del concepto y parte de un análisis de los casos contenciosos y las opiniones consultivas del órgano mencionado.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2021-11-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/epub+ziphttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/2296710.18800/derechopucp.202102.008Derecho PUCP; Núm. 87 (2021): Diálogos entre el sistema de Derecho Civil y el Common Law; 273-3072305-25460251-3420reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22967/23233http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22967/23508http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22967/23509Derechos de autor 2021 Helga María Lellhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistaspuc:article/229672025-01-14T17:29:29Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Dignity According to the Subject. Three Possible Meanings in Conventionality Control La dignidad en función del sujeto. Tres posibles sentidos para un control de convencionalidad |
| title |
Dignity According to the Subject. Three Possible Meanings in Conventionality Control |
| spellingShingle |
Dignity According to the Subject. Three Possible Meanings in Conventionality Control Lell, Helga María Dignity Subject Inter-American Court of Human Rights Concept Semantics Dignidad Sujeto Corte IDH Concepto Semántica |
| title_short |
Dignity According to the Subject. Three Possible Meanings in Conventionality Control |
| title_full |
Dignity According to the Subject. Three Possible Meanings in Conventionality Control |
| title_fullStr |
Dignity According to the Subject. Three Possible Meanings in Conventionality Control |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Dignity According to the Subject. Three Possible Meanings in Conventionality Control |
| title_sort |
Dignity According to the Subject. Three Possible Meanings in Conventionality Control |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Lell, Helga María |
| author |
Lell, Helga María |
| author_facet |
Lell, Helga María |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Dignity Subject Inter-American Court of Human Rights Concept Semantics Dignidad Sujeto Corte IDH Concepto Semántica |
| topic |
Dignity Subject Inter-American Court of Human Rights Concept Semantics Dignidad Sujeto Corte IDH Concepto Semántica |
| description |
This paper presents three categories in which the notion of dignity can be used in jurisprudence, depending on the subject to which it is ascribed: as institutional status, as a characteristic of the human being and as a characterization of other elements. In each one of the types, in the first place, a theoretical explanation is made that, although brief, tries to introduce some characteristics about the respective meaning. Second, it describes how the Inter-American Court of Human Rights has used the term «dignity» in the respective sense; that is, a review of the casuistry is included. Finally, some ideas are discussed. The methodology has been analytical regarding the use of the concept and is based on an analysis of the contentious cases and theadvisory opinions of the mentioned institution. |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-11-25 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22967 10.18800/derechopucp.202102.008 |
| url |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22967 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.18800/derechopucp.202102.008 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22967/23233 http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22967/23508 http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22967/23509 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2021 Helga María Lell http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2021 Helga María Lell http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html application/epub+zip |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Derecho PUCP; Núm. 87 (2021): Diálogos entre el sistema de Derecho Civil y el Common Law; 273-307 2305-2546 0251-3420 reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instacron:PUCP |
| instname_str |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| instacron_str |
PUCP |
| institution |
PUCP |
| reponame_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| collection |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1840900875410735104 |
| score |
12.93831 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
