Partner or Former Partner Femicide’s Characterization and Discriminatory Hate Crimes
Descripción del Articulo
This article aims to specify a coherent and useful interpretation of feminicide behavior (or as preferred by the author “femicide”), which is included, in a non -uniform manner- in several criminal definitions in Latin American legislations. Indeed, the author asserts the need for an individualized...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2018 |
Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:revistaspuc:article/20434 |
Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/20434 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Feminicide femicide hate crime gender violence discrimination instrumental violence Feminicidio femicidio delitos de odio violencia de género discriminación violencia instrumental |
id |
REVPUCP_6d0258ce784184ce2555c6bd836cdcce |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistaspuc:article/20434 |
network_acronym_str |
REVPUCP |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
repository_id_str |
|
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Partner or Former Partner Femicide’s Characterization and Discriminatory Hate Crimes La caracterización del feminicidio de la pareja o expareja y los delitos de odio discriminatorio |
title |
Partner or Former Partner Femicide’s Characterization and Discriminatory Hate Crimes |
spellingShingle |
Partner or Former Partner Femicide’s Characterization and Discriminatory Hate Crimes Pérez Manzano, Mercedes Feminicide femicide hate crime gender violence discrimination instrumental violence Feminicidio femicidio delitos de odio violencia de género discriminación violencia instrumental |
title_short |
Partner or Former Partner Femicide’s Characterization and Discriminatory Hate Crimes |
title_full |
Partner or Former Partner Femicide’s Characterization and Discriminatory Hate Crimes |
title_fullStr |
Partner or Former Partner Femicide’s Characterization and Discriminatory Hate Crimes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Partner or Former Partner Femicide’s Characterization and Discriminatory Hate Crimes |
title_sort |
Partner or Former Partner Femicide’s Characterization and Discriminatory Hate Crimes |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Pérez Manzano, Mercedes |
author |
Pérez Manzano, Mercedes |
author_facet |
Pérez Manzano, Mercedes |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Feminicide femicide hate crime gender violence discrimination instrumental violence Feminicidio femicidio delitos de odio violencia de género discriminación violencia instrumental |
topic |
Feminicide femicide hate crime gender violence discrimination instrumental violence Feminicidio femicidio delitos de odio violencia de género discriminación violencia instrumental |
description |
This article aims to specify a coherent and useful interpretation of feminicide behavior (or as preferred by the author “femicide”), which is included, in a non -uniform manner- in several criminal definitions in Latin American legislations. Indeed, the author asserts the need for an individualized criminal protection of women against gender violence, and confirms the praiseworthy work it is being done in Latin America, yet femicide as a criminal offense in the region is not defined accurately. Thus, the author concludes this is the reflection of a criminal policy that suffers from inaccuracies, duplicities and, in some cases, excessive punitiveness. The author questions the criminal definition of femicide as the death of a “woman because of her condition as such” or other similar definitions that include the murder of a woman because of the mere fact of being a woman. When referring to the death of a woman committed by her partner or former partner, the author characterizes feminicide as a form of violence which constitutes an instrument of discriminatory domination, in other words, violence against women with the purpose of maintaining or re-establishing unequal power relationships or simply to reaffirm the discriminatory sense of his act, denying the victim his right to equality. From this perspective, the author discusses considering partner or former partner femicide as a hate crime, since the characteristic of this criminal definition is its collective dimension (the implicit threat to the collective) and the parallel fungible condition of the victim. In the opinion of the author, in partner or former-partner femicide the woman’s death is related to both the bias that exists towards women, how they should behaved (machismo), and what was expected of the victim (as herself). It is an individual phenomenon, of only one dimension. Under all these considerations the text culminates analyzing the Peruvian criminal type of femicide, acknowledging some successes but also reiterating their mistakes. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-11-28 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/20434 10.18800/derechopucp.201802.006 |
url |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/20434 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18800/derechopucp.201802.006 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/20434/20350 http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/20434/22382 http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/20434/23005 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2018 Derecho PUCP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2018 Derecho PUCP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/epub+zip text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Derecho PUCP; Núm. 81 (2018): Derecho Penal: Aspectos Actuales de la Dogmática y la Política Criminal; 163-196 2305-2546 0251-3420 reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instacron:PUCP |
instname_str |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
instacron_str |
PUCP |
institution |
PUCP |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
collection |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1840900862142054400 |
spelling |
Partner or Former Partner Femicide’s Characterization and Discriminatory Hate CrimesLa caracterización del feminicidio de la pareja o expareja y los delitos de odio discriminatorioPérez Manzano, MercedesFeminicidefemicidehate crimegender violencediscriminationinstrumentalviolenceFeminicidiofemicidiodelitos de odioviolencia de génerodiscriminaciónviolencia instrumentalThis article aims to specify a coherent and useful interpretation of feminicide behavior (or as preferred by the author “femicide”), which is included, in a non -uniform manner- in several criminal definitions in Latin American legislations. Indeed, the author asserts the need for an individualized criminal protection of women against gender violence, and confirms the praiseworthy work it is being done in Latin America, yet femicide as a criminal offense in the region is not defined accurately. Thus, the author concludes this is the reflection of a criminal policy that suffers from inaccuracies, duplicities and, in some cases, excessive punitiveness. The author questions the criminal definition of femicide as the death of a “woman because of her condition as such” or other similar definitions that include the murder of a woman because of the mere fact of being a woman. When referring to the death of a woman committed by her partner or former partner, the author characterizes feminicide as a form of violence which constitutes an instrument of discriminatory domination, in other words, violence against women with the purpose of maintaining or re-establishing unequal power relationships or simply to reaffirm the discriminatory sense of his act, denying the victim his right to equality. From this perspective, the author discusses considering partner or former partner femicide as a hate crime, since the characteristic of this criminal definition is its collective dimension (the implicit threat to the collective) and the parallel fungible condition of the victim. In the opinion of the author, in partner or former-partner femicide the woman’s death is related to both the bias that exists towards women, how they should behaved (machismo), and what was expected of the victim (as herself). It is an individual phenomenon, of only one dimension. Under all these considerations the text culminates analyzing the Peruvian criminal type of femicide, acknowledging some successes but also reiterating their mistakes. El texto pretende ofrecer una interpretación coherente y útil de la conducta feminicida (o femicida, en la expresión preferida por la autora) contenida principalmente, de manera no uniforme, en diversos tipos penales de las legislaciones latinoamericanas. Efectivamente, luego de afirmar la necesidad de una individualización en la protección penal de la mujer frente a la violencia de género y de constatar lo loables que resultan los enunciados penales latinoamericanos (pese a su carácter disperso), concluye que estos no son el reflejo de una buena política criminal. En efecto, sus enunciados adolecen de imprecisiones, duplicidades y, en algunos casos, de exceso de punitivismo. Para tal efecto, la autora cuestiona la definición del feminicidio como la muerte de «una mujer por su condición de tal» u otras expresiones semejantes —es decir, la muerte por el simple hecho de ser mujer—. Refiriéndose en concreto a la muerte de una mujer a manos de su pareja o expareja, la autora caracteriza el feminicidio como una forma de violencia constitutiva de ser instrumento de dominación discriminatoria, es decir, violencia que se ejerce contra la mujer para mantener o restablecer las desiguales relaciones de poder o, simplemente, para reafirmar el sentido discriminatorio de su acto, negándole a la víctima su derecho a la igualdad. Desde esta perspectiva, la autora discute la consideración del feminicidio de la pareja o expareja como delito de odio, pues lo característico de este es su dimensión colectiva (el significado de amenaza implícita al colectivo) y la paralela condición fungible de la víctima. En opinión de la autora, en el feminicidio de la pareja o expareja la muerte de la mujer se relaciona con el comportamiento concreto asignado prejuiciosamente (machismo) y esperado de la mujer concreta. Es un fenómeno de una dimensión, fundamentalmente, individual. Bajo todas estas consideraciones, el texto culmina analizando el tipo penal peruano de feminicidio, reconociéndole algunos aciertos, pero también reiterando sus desaciertos.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2018-11-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/epub+ziptext/htmlhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/2043410.18800/derechopucp.201802.006Derecho PUCP; Núm. 81 (2018): Derecho Penal: Aspectos Actuales de la Dogmática y la Política Criminal; 163-1962305-25460251-3420reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/20434/20350http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/20434/22382http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/20434/23005Derechos de autor 2018 Derecho PUCPhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistaspuc:article/204342025-01-14T22:04:59Z |
score |
12.84232 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).