Deficiencies in the constitutional (re)construction of the habeas data process in Peru

Descripción del Articulo

In this article, the author analyzes the shortcomings in the constitutional reconstruction of the habeas data process in Peru, focusing on the protection of the right of access to public information and informational self-determination.Through a review of the regulatory framework and its evolution,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Loyola Ríos, Néstor
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2025
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/33553
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/33553
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Habeas data
Right of access to information
Informational self-determination
New Constitutional Procedural Code
Derecho de acceso a la información
Autodeterminación informativa
Nuevo Código Procesal Constitucional
Descripción
Sumario:In this article, the author analyzes the shortcomings in the constitutional reconstruction of the habeas data process in Peru, focusing on the protection of the right of access to public information and informational self-determination.Through a review of the regulatory framework and its evolution, the article highlights the challenges in implementing the process established in the New Constitutional Procedural Code. Despite the reforms, the article points out technical and procedural flaws that make it difficult for both citizens and justice officials to understand.Furthermore, regulatory adjustments are proposed that could improve the effectiveness of this constitutional process, especially in relation to the mandatory nature of legal representation, the definitions of personal data banks, and the lack of alignment between administrative and jurisdictional regulations. The author concludes that it is urgent to modify the current legislation to facilitate access to justice and guarantee the protection of citizens’ fundamental rights.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).