Preliminary Ruling 242-IP-2015 of the Andean Court of Justice. About the active legitimacy of administrative authorities to request preliminary ruling and the registration requirements applied to tactile marks

Descripción del Articulo

On August 24, 2015, the Andean Court of Justice issued the Preliminary Ruling 242-IP-2015, on the tactile mark consisting in the surface of the whisky bottle Old Parr. This Preliminary Ruling is the first one rendered by an international court about tactile marks. The purpose of this paper is to exp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Indacochea, Juan Manuel
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2018
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20292
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/20292
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Functionality
National Judge
Tactile Mark
Principle of Autonomy
Community Law
Andean Court of Justice
Funcionalidad
Juez Nacional
Marca Táctil
Principio de Autonomía
Derecho Comunitario
Tribunal de Justicia de la Comunidad Andina
id REVPUCP_6b9a8bedaf2dcdd3eabae0da26c69a7c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20292
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling Preliminary Ruling 242-IP-2015 of the Andean Court of Justice. About the active legitimacy of administrative authorities to request preliminary ruling and the registration requirements applied to tactile marksLa interpretación prejudicial 242-IP-2015 del Tribunal Andino. Sobre la legitimidad activa de las autoridades administrativas para solicitar interpretación prejudicial y la aplicación de los requisitos de registrabilidad a las marcas táctiles o de texturaIndacochea, Juan ManuelFunctionalityNational JudgeTactile MarkPrinciple of AutonomyCommunity LawAndean Court of JusticeFuncionalidadJuez NacionalMarca TáctilPrincipio de AutonomíaDerecho ComunitarioTribunal de Justicia de la Comunidad AndinaOn August 24, 2015, the Andean Court of Justice issued the Preliminary Ruling 242-IP-2015, on the tactile mark consisting in the surface of the whisky bottle Old Parr. This Preliminary Ruling is the first one rendered by an international court about tactile marks. The purpose of this paper is to explain the application of the main registration requirements to new types of marks, in the light of the criteria explained in the aforementioned Preliminary Ruling. It also aims to analyze the previous jurisprudential development, concerning the active legitimacy of the Administrative Authorities of the Member Countries to optionally request Preliminary Rulings. That is the first question –or subject– addressed in the above-mentioned Preliminary Ruling since the interpretation was requested by an Administrative Authority of Colombia.El 24 de agosto de 2015, el Tribunal de Justicia de la Comunidad Andina emitió la interpretación prejudicial recaída en el Proceso 242-IP-2015(2), sobre la marca táctil o de textura consistente en la superficie de la botella de whisky Old Parr, la cual constituye el primer pronunciamiento de un tribunal o corte internacional referido a una marca táctil o de textura. El presente estudio analiza la aplicación de los principales requisitos de registrabilidad a este nuevo tipo de marca, a la luz de los alcances expresados en el citado pronunciamiento; así como el desarrollo jurisprudencial previo, relativo a la legitimidad activa de las autoridades administrativas para solicitar interpretaciones prejudiciales facultativas, primer tema o cuestión prejudicial desarrollada en la precitada interpretación prejudicial, en virtud de haber sido solicitada por la Dirección de Signos Distintivos de la Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio de la República de Colombia.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2018-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/20292IUS ET VERITAS; No. 56 (2018); 106-129IUS ET VERITAS; Núm. 56 (2018); 106-129IUS ET VERITAS; No. 56 (2018); 106-129IUS ET VERITAS; N. 56 (2018); 106-129IUS ET VERITAS; n. 56 (2018); 106-1291995-2929reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/20292/20246Derechos de autor 2018 IUS ET VERITAShttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/202922019-05-31T19:06:40Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Preliminary Ruling 242-IP-2015 of the Andean Court of Justice. About the active legitimacy of administrative authorities to request preliminary ruling and the registration requirements applied to tactile marks
La interpretación prejudicial 242-IP-2015 del Tribunal Andino. Sobre la legitimidad activa de las autoridades administrativas para solicitar interpretación prejudicial y la aplicación de los requisitos de registrabilidad a las marcas táctiles o de textura
title Preliminary Ruling 242-IP-2015 of the Andean Court of Justice. About the active legitimacy of administrative authorities to request preliminary ruling and the registration requirements applied to tactile marks
spellingShingle Preliminary Ruling 242-IP-2015 of the Andean Court of Justice. About the active legitimacy of administrative authorities to request preliminary ruling and the registration requirements applied to tactile marks
Indacochea, Juan Manuel
Functionality
National Judge
Tactile Mark
Principle of Autonomy
Community Law
Andean Court of Justice
Funcionalidad
Juez Nacional
Marca Táctil
Principio de Autonomía
Derecho Comunitario
Tribunal de Justicia de la Comunidad Andina
title_short Preliminary Ruling 242-IP-2015 of the Andean Court of Justice. About the active legitimacy of administrative authorities to request preliminary ruling and the registration requirements applied to tactile marks
title_full Preliminary Ruling 242-IP-2015 of the Andean Court of Justice. About the active legitimacy of administrative authorities to request preliminary ruling and the registration requirements applied to tactile marks
title_fullStr Preliminary Ruling 242-IP-2015 of the Andean Court of Justice. About the active legitimacy of administrative authorities to request preliminary ruling and the registration requirements applied to tactile marks
title_full_unstemmed Preliminary Ruling 242-IP-2015 of the Andean Court of Justice. About the active legitimacy of administrative authorities to request preliminary ruling and the registration requirements applied to tactile marks
title_sort Preliminary Ruling 242-IP-2015 of the Andean Court of Justice. About the active legitimacy of administrative authorities to request preliminary ruling and the registration requirements applied to tactile marks
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Indacochea, Juan Manuel
author Indacochea, Juan Manuel
author_facet Indacochea, Juan Manuel
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Functionality
National Judge
Tactile Mark
Principle of Autonomy
Community Law
Andean Court of Justice
Funcionalidad
Juez Nacional
Marca Táctil
Principio de Autonomía
Derecho Comunitario
Tribunal de Justicia de la Comunidad Andina
topic Functionality
National Judge
Tactile Mark
Principle of Autonomy
Community Law
Andean Court of Justice
Funcionalidad
Juez Nacional
Marca Táctil
Principio de Autonomía
Derecho Comunitario
Tribunal de Justicia de la Comunidad Andina
description On August 24, 2015, the Andean Court of Justice issued the Preliminary Ruling 242-IP-2015, on the tactile mark consisting in the surface of the whisky bottle Old Parr. This Preliminary Ruling is the first one rendered by an international court about tactile marks. The purpose of this paper is to explain the application of the main registration requirements to new types of marks, in the light of the criteria explained in the aforementioned Preliminary Ruling. It also aims to analyze the previous jurisprudential development, concerning the active legitimacy of the Administrative Authorities of the Member Countries to optionally request Preliminary Rulings. That is the first question –or subject– addressed in the above-mentioned Preliminary Ruling since the interpretation was requested by an Administrative Authority of Colombia.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/20292
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/20292
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/20292/20246
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2018 IUS ET VERITAS
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2018 IUS ET VERITAS
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv IUS ET VERITAS; No. 56 (2018); 106-129
IUS ET VERITAS; Núm. 56 (2018); 106-129
IUS ET VERITAS; No. 56 (2018); 106-129
IUS ET VERITAS; N. 56 (2018); 106-129
IUS ET VERITAS; n. 56 (2018); 106-129
1995-2929
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1853585539862626304
score 12.8553705
Preliminary Ruling 242-IP-2015 of the Andean Court of Justice. About the active legitimacy of administrative authorities to request preliminary ruling and the registration requirements applied to tactile marks
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).

Ejemplares Similares