Public services and remunicipalization

Descripción del Articulo

It is difficult to define the legal concept of public service. There are two ways to understand it. The first one is objective and tries to determine which activities and services should be guaranteed to all citizens with the aim of social cohesion. The second one is subjective and is based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Tornos Mas, Joaquín
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2016
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistaspuc:article/14848
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/14848
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:municipalization
remunicipalization
return
service of general economic interest
public service
municipalización
remunicipalización
rescate
servicio económico de interés general
servicio público
id REVPUCP_5b131dfa7eaa334f0d07dc6eb1add6ec
oai_identifier_str oai:revistaspuc:article/14848
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling Public services and remunicipalizationServicios públicos y remunicipalizaciónTornos Mas, Joaquínmunicipalizationremunicipalizationreturnservice of general economic interestpublic servicemunicipalizaciónremunicipalizaciónrescateservicio económico de interés generalservicio públicoIt is difficult to define the legal concept of public service. There are two ways to understand it. The first one is objective and tries to determine which activities and services should be guaranteed to all citizens with the aim of social cohesion. The second one is subjective and is based on the idea that public services are activities excluded from the market. This second conception emphasizes the problems arising from the relationship between the public and private sectors rather than the right of the citizenship to receive specific services. Within this general conceptual framework, this work shows the current debate which is not centered on which kinds of public services are to be provided but rather on how they have to be provided. The debate has a strong ideological content and defends the return to public management at the expense of private management, which is considered inefficient. This work analyzes the debate and introduces some objections to remunicipalization.El concepto jurídico de servicio público es de difícil precisión. Existen dos concepciones de servicio público: una objetiva, preocupada por determinar qué actividades prestacionales deben ser garantizadas a todos los ciudadanos con el fin de lograr la cohesión social, y otra de carácter subjetivo, basada en la idea de que el servicio público es la actividad excluida del régimen de mercado, incidiendo sobre todo en los problemas de la relación entre sector público y sector privado más que en los derechos de los ciudadanos a obtener unas determinadas prestaciones. Dentro de este marco general conceptual, el presente trabajo pone de manifiesto como en la actualidad se ha abierto un debate de fuerte contenido ideológico en el que no se debate sobre qué servicios deben prestarse, sino sobre cómo deben prestarse los servicios públicos, defendiendo la recuperación de la gestión pública frente a una gestión privada que se califica de ineficiente. El trabajo analiza este debate y formula algunas objeciones a la tesis de la llamada «remunicipalización».Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2016-05-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/1484810.18800/derechopucp.201601.002Derecho PUCP; Núm. 76 (2016): Derecho Administrativo: Regulación de Servicios Públicos y Competencia; 51-762305-25460251-3420reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/14848/15390Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho PUCPhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistaspuc:article/148482025-01-14T22:12:17Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Public services and remunicipalization
Servicios públicos y remunicipalización
title Public services and remunicipalization
spellingShingle Public services and remunicipalization
Tornos Mas, Joaquín
municipalization
remunicipalization
return
service of general economic interest
public service
municipalización
remunicipalización
rescate
servicio económico de interés general
servicio público
title_short Public services and remunicipalization
title_full Public services and remunicipalization
title_fullStr Public services and remunicipalization
title_full_unstemmed Public services and remunicipalization
title_sort Public services and remunicipalization
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Tornos Mas, Joaquín
author Tornos Mas, Joaquín
author_facet Tornos Mas, Joaquín
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv municipalization
remunicipalization
return
service of general economic interest
public service
municipalización
remunicipalización
rescate
servicio económico de interés general
servicio público
topic municipalization
remunicipalization
return
service of general economic interest
public service
municipalización
remunicipalización
rescate
servicio económico de interés general
servicio público
description It is difficult to define the legal concept of public service. There are two ways to understand it. The first one is objective and tries to determine which activities and services should be guaranteed to all citizens with the aim of social cohesion. The second one is subjective and is based on the idea that public services are activities excluded from the market. This second conception emphasizes the problems arising from the relationship between the public and private sectors rather than the right of the citizenship to receive specific services. Within this general conceptual framework, this work shows the current debate which is not centered on which kinds of public services are to be provided but rather on how they have to be provided. The debate has a strong ideological content and defends the return to public management at the expense of private management, which is considered inefficient. This work analyzes the debate and introduces some objections to remunicipalization.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-05-25
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/14848
10.18800/derechopucp.201601.002
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/14848
identifier_str_mv 10.18800/derechopucp.201601.002
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/14848/15390
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho PUCP
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho PUCP
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Derecho PUCP; Núm. 76 (2016): Derecho Administrativo: Regulación de Servicios Públicos y Competencia; 51-76
2305-2546
0251-3420
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1840900849754177536
score 13.238668
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).