Expert Opinion in Construction Disputes: Duties and Professional Liability of Experts
Descripción del Articulo
Disputes in the construction industry usually require the participation of a variety of qualified specialists who can assist the tribunal in understanding the high complexity of contract performance. In arbitration, the expert is generally appointed by one of the parties, although his opinion is sol...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2020 |
Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:revistaspuc:article/23491 |
Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/23491 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Expert professional liability impartiality construction arbitration client arbitration tribunal Perito responsabilidad profesional imparcialidad arbitraje de construcción cliente tribunal arbitral |
id |
REVPUCP_5010147c9c61b4955c1b1b31af5239b9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistaspuc:article/23491 |
network_acronym_str |
REVPUCP |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Expert Opinion in Construction Disputes: Duties and Professional Liability of ExpertsOpinión experta en arbitraje de construcción: deberes y responsabilidad profesional de los peritosWaidhofer Ludeña, KatherineExpertprofessional liabilityimpartialityconstruction arbitrationclientarbitration tribunalPeritoresponsabilidad profesionalimparcialidadarbitraje de construcciónclientetribunal arbitralDisputes in the construction industry usually require the participation of a variety of qualified specialists who can assist the tribunal in understanding the high complexity of contract performance. In arbitration, the expert is generally appointed by one of the parties, although his opinion is solely obliged to the tribunal. Naturally, this relationship of perceived ambivalence between the expert, the party who appoints him and the tribunal can raise questions about the impartiality and independence of his opinion.In this article, the author analyzes the international statutes and soft law that regulate the duties and professional responsibilities of experts in construction arbitration. In particular, she evaluates the treatment of the figure under Peruvian law and sheds light on whether the regulation provided by the Civil Code is sufficient. Furthermore, the author remarks the main measures adopted by arbitration tribunals to test the objectivity of expert opinions and the applicable standard of care for determining possible non-compliance by experts in the Peruvian legal system.Las controversias en la industria de la construcción usualmente requieren de la participación de una variedad de especialistas calificados que puedan asistir al tribunal a comprender la alta complejidad de la ejecución del contrato. Generalmente en el arbitraje, el perito es nombrado por una de las partes en la disputa, aunque debe el sentido de su opinión únicamente al tribunal. Por supuesto, esta relación de aparente ambivalencia puede generar dudas sobre la imparcialidad y objetividad de un experto.En el presente artículo, la autora analiza las distintas normas e instrumentos internacionales que regulan los deberes y la responsabilidad profesional de los peritos en los arbitrajes de construcción. En concreto, evalúa el tratamiento de la figura en el derecho peruano y da luces sobre si la regulación que proporciona el Código Civil es suficiente. Asimismo, señala las principales medidas adoptadas por los tribunales arbitrales para confrontar la objetividad de las opiniones expertas, y el estándar de diligencia aplicable para determinar posibles incumplimientos por parte de los peritos en el ordenamiento peruano.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2020-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/2349110.18800/themis.202001.020THEMIS Revista de Derecho; Núm. 77 (2020): Arbitraje; 379-3931810-9934reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/23491/22469http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/23491/22504http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistaspuc:article/234912024-02-08T13:27:33Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Expert Opinion in Construction Disputes: Duties and Professional Liability of Experts Opinión experta en arbitraje de construcción: deberes y responsabilidad profesional de los peritos |
title |
Expert Opinion in Construction Disputes: Duties and Professional Liability of Experts |
spellingShingle |
Expert Opinion in Construction Disputes: Duties and Professional Liability of Experts Waidhofer Ludeña, Katherine Expert professional liability impartiality construction arbitration client arbitration tribunal Perito responsabilidad profesional imparcialidad arbitraje de construcción cliente tribunal arbitral |
title_short |
Expert Opinion in Construction Disputes: Duties and Professional Liability of Experts |
title_full |
Expert Opinion in Construction Disputes: Duties and Professional Liability of Experts |
title_fullStr |
Expert Opinion in Construction Disputes: Duties and Professional Liability of Experts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Expert Opinion in Construction Disputes: Duties and Professional Liability of Experts |
title_sort |
Expert Opinion in Construction Disputes: Duties and Professional Liability of Experts |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Waidhofer Ludeña, Katherine |
author |
Waidhofer Ludeña, Katherine |
author_facet |
Waidhofer Ludeña, Katherine |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Expert professional liability impartiality construction arbitration client arbitration tribunal Perito responsabilidad profesional imparcialidad arbitraje de construcción cliente tribunal arbitral |
topic |
Expert professional liability impartiality construction arbitration client arbitration tribunal Perito responsabilidad profesional imparcialidad arbitraje de construcción cliente tribunal arbitral |
description |
Disputes in the construction industry usually require the participation of a variety of qualified specialists who can assist the tribunal in understanding the high complexity of contract performance. In arbitration, the expert is generally appointed by one of the parties, although his opinion is solely obliged to the tribunal. Naturally, this relationship of perceived ambivalence between the expert, the party who appoints him and the tribunal can raise questions about the impartiality and independence of his opinion.In this article, the author analyzes the international statutes and soft law that regulate the duties and professional responsibilities of experts in construction arbitration. In particular, she evaluates the treatment of the figure under Peruvian law and sheds light on whether the regulation provided by the Civil Code is sufficient. Furthermore, the author remarks the main measures adopted by arbitration tribunals to test the objectivity of expert opinions and the applicable standard of care for determining possible non-compliance by experts in the Peruvian legal system. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-21 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/23491 10.18800/themis.202001.020 |
url |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/23491 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18800/themis.202001.020 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/23491/22469 http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/23491/22504 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
THEMIS Revista de Derecho; Núm. 77 (2020): Arbitraje; 379-393 1810-9934 reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instacron:PUCP |
instname_str |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
instacron_str |
PUCP |
institution |
PUCP |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
collection |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1840901200011067392 |
score |
12.850736 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).