Efficiency in Construction Arbitration Management
Descripción del Articulo
Arbitration is the mechanism most widely used worldwide in resolving construction disputes. Nonetheless, arbitration faces challenges related to its costs and length. This phenomenon has caused the study and the proposal of several recommendations in construction arbitration, which embodies the best...
Autores: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2020 |
Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:revistaspuc:article/23249 |
Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/23249 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Arbitraje de Construcción Eficiencia Tribunal Arbitral Reglas IBA Cámara de Comercio Internacional Arbitraje en el Perú Construction Arbitration Efficiency Arbitral Tribunal IBA Rules, International Chamber of Commerce Arbitration in Peru |
Sumario: | Arbitration is the mechanism most widely used worldwide in resolving construction disputes. Nonetheless, arbitration faces challenges related to its costs and length. This phenomenon has caused the study and the proposal of several recommendations in construction arbitration, which embodies the best practices in the mitigation of the inefficiencies under analysis. Given that two of the main causes of the inefficiencies in international construction arbitration proceedings are direct or indirectly related to the arbitrator’s role, it is argued that an arbitrator’s proactive leadership and a fearless attitude toward the so-called due process paranoia might have a significant impact in increasing efficiency, which finally will benefit both arbitration users and arbitrators. Several measures have been recommended and implemented at international level in this regard. Those measures could be replicated in domestic construction arbitrations, as long as they do not contravene the Arbitration Act or institutional arbitrations rules. |
---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).