The personal effectiveness of the collective agreement: Comings and goings on the unilateral extension of the collective agreement

Descripción del Articulo

The unilateral extension of the collective agreement has been widely discussed by Peruvian doctrine and jurisprudence for more than a decade. Aside from this, it maintains its validity to the extent that there is still a contrast in positions between two decision-making bodies of the Peruvian labor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Boza Pró, Guillermo, Briones Zegarra, Joaquín
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2024
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistaspuc:article/30768
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/30768
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Extensión unilateral del convenio colectivo
Libertad sindical
Principio de igualdad
Representación sindical
Corte Suprema
Tribunal de Fiscalización Laboral de la SUNAFIL
Unilateral extension of collective agreement
Freedom of association
Principle of equal treatment
Union representation
Supreme Court
Labour Inspection Court of the National Superintendence of Labour Inspection
Descripción
Sumario:The unilateral extension of the collective agreement has been widely discussed by Peruvian doctrine and jurisprudence for more than a decade. Aside from this, it maintains its validity to the extent that there is still a contrast in positions between two decision-making bodies of the Peruvian labor legal system. This article addresses the topic with the purpose of establishing a position on the debate, developing its analysis in three sections. Firstly, basic issues relating to the collective agreement as a bargaining product, its legal effectiveness and its personal effectiveness related to the criterion of greater representativeness are reviewed. Secondly, the jurisprudential evolution that the topic has had in the decisions of the Supreme Court, such as those of the Labour Inspection Court of the National Superintendence of Labour Inspection, is detailed; in such a way that the authors mark their position on the arguments outlined in each case. Next, a rarely touched upon aspect of the theme is developed; that is, the possibility for non-unionized workers to retain the benefits unilaterally extended by the employer. The article ends with some brief conclusions on what has been reflected.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).