Meaning in the perspective of Luhmann: between its formal definition and its taking form
Descripción del Articulo
This article analyzes the theoretical and epistemological elaborations of Luhmann about the problem of meaning. Its aim is to trace the key tension that crosses the different inflections of his proposal: between a formal definition of meaning, with the distinction of selective actuality and the hori...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2016 |
Institución: | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:revistaspuc:article/16035 |
Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/16035 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | contemporary sociological theory epistemology meaning Luhmann conceptual construction teoría sociológica contemporánea epistemología sentido construcción conceptual |
id |
REVPUCP_1e97ae079fd471db7ca41ab3ba146b4b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistaspuc:article/16035 |
network_acronym_str |
REVPUCP |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Meaning in the perspective of Luhmann: between its formal definition and its taking formEl sentido en la perspectiva de Luhmann: entre una definición formal y su puesta en formaBialakowsky, Alejandrocontemporary sociological theoryepistemologymeaningLuhmannconceptual constructionteoría sociológica contemporáneaepistemologíasentidoLuhmannconstrucción conceptualThis article analyzes the theoretical and epistemological elaborations of Luhmann about the problem of meaning. Its aim is to trace the key tension that crosses the different inflections of his proposal: between a formal definition of meaning, with the distinction of selective actuality and the horizon of potentialities, and its taking form, parting from the operations of systems. In order to do this, three decisive moments of his perspective are studied. First, the article focuses on his claim to formally conceptualize and to «desubjectivize» meaning, within a series of theoretical inheritances and ruptures.Second, it analyzes the consequences of his autopoietical proposal, either by pointing out meaning as the coevolutionary achievement of psychic and social systems, or in its analysis of the linguistic generalization of meaning. Third, in his later works, with the intensification of his theory of the observer, the article examines his approach to meaning from the distinction between medium and form. Finally, the previous considerations are combined with his theory of evolution and differentiation of society, from which the article reflects on the particularities of the conceptual construction of Luhmann about meaning.Este artículo analiza las elaboraciones teóricas y epistemológicas de Luhmann acerca del problema del sentido. El objetivo es rastrear la tensión clave que atraviesa las distintas inflexiones de su mirada entre una definición formal del sentido, con la distinción de la actualidad selectiva y el horizonte de potencialidades, y su puesta en forma, a partir de las operaciones de los sistemas. Para ello, se recorren tres momentos decisivos de su mirada. En primer lugar, se focaliza en su pretensión de conceptualizar al sentido de modo formal y «des-subjetivado», en un juego de herencias y rupturas teóricas. En segundo lugar, se da cuenta de las consecuencias de su propuesta autopoiética, ya sea al señalar al sentido como logro coevolutivo de los sistemas psíquicos y sociales, ya sea en su análisis de la generalización lingüística del sentido. En tercer lugar, en sus últimas obras, con la intensificación de su teoría del observador, se interroga su abordaje del sentido desde la distinción entre medio y forma. Por último, se aúnan las anteriores consideraciones con su teoría de la evolución y diferenciación de la sociedad, a partir de lo cual se reflexiona sobre las particularidades de la construcción conceptual de Luhmann respecto del sentido.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2016-12-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/1603510.18800/debatesensociologia.201601.001Debates en Sociología; Núm. 42 (2016); 5-292304-42840254-9220reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/16035/16459Derechos de autor 2016 Debates en Sociologíahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistaspuc:article/160352020-08-28T18:58:32Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Meaning in the perspective of Luhmann: between its formal definition and its taking form El sentido en la perspectiva de Luhmann: entre una definición formal y su puesta en forma |
title |
Meaning in the perspective of Luhmann: between its formal definition and its taking form |
spellingShingle |
Meaning in the perspective of Luhmann: between its formal definition and its taking form Bialakowsky, Alejandro contemporary sociological theory epistemology meaning Luhmann conceptual construction teoría sociológica contemporánea epistemología sentido Luhmann construcción conceptual |
title_short |
Meaning in the perspective of Luhmann: between its formal definition and its taking form |
title_full |
Meaning in the perspective of Luhmann: between its formal definition and its taking form |
title_fullStr |
Meaning in the perspective of Luhmann: between its formal definition and its taking form |
title_full_unstemmed |
Meaning in the perspective of Luhmann: between its formal definition and its taking form |
title_sort |
Meaning in the perspective of Luhmann: between its formal definition and its taking form |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Bialakowsky, Alejandro |
author |
Bialakowsky, Alejandro |
author_facet |
Bialakowsky, Alejandro |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
contemporary sociological theory epistemology meaning Luhmann conceptual construction teoría sociológica contemporánea epistemología sentido Luhmann construcción conceptual |
topic |
contemporary sociological theory epistemology meaning Luhmann conceptual construction teoría sociológica contemporánea epistemología sentido Luhmann construcción conceptual |
description |
This article analyzes the theoretical and epistemological elaborations of Luhmann about the problem of meaning. Its aim is to trace the key tension that crosses the different inflections of his proposal: between a formal definition of meaning, with the distinction of selective actuality and the horizon of potentialities, and its taking form, parting from the operations of systems. In order to do this, three decisive moments of his perspective are studied. First, the article focuses on his claim to formally conceptualize and to «desubjectivize» meaning, within a series of theoretical inheritances and ruptures.Second, it analyzes the consequences of his autopoietical proposal, either by pointing out meaning as the coevolutionary achievement of psychic and social systems, or in its analysis of the linguistic generalization of meaning. Third, in his later works, with the intensification of his theory of the observer, the article examines his approach to meaning from the distinction between medium and form. Finally, the previous considerations are combined with his theory of evolution and differentiation of society, from which the article reflects on the particularities of the conceptual construction of Luhmann about meaning. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-12-12 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/16035 10.18800/debatesensociologia.201601.001 |
url |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/16035 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18800/debatesensociologia.201601.001 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/debatesensociologia/article/view/16035/16459 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2016 Debates en Sociología http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2016 Debates en Sociología http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Debates en Sociología; Núm. 42 (2016); 5-29 2304-4284 0254-9220 reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú instacron:PUCP |
instname_str |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
instacron_str |
PUCP |
institution |
PUCP |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
collection |
Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1836736773916459008 |
score |
13.7211075 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).