Holding the line on human rights accountability: Explaining the unlikely judicial overturn of the pardon and immunity granted to human rights violator Alberto Fujimori

Descripción del Articulo

Alberto Fujimori, Peruvian ex-president and perpetrator of human rights violations, was released from prison due to a presidential pardon in 2017. He was also granted immunity from prosecution. Although the political branches and the majority of the population supported these measures, as shown by p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: de Belaunde de Cárdenas, Javier Alonso
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:revistaspuc:article/22121
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/22121
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Rendición de cuentas
Control de convencionalidad
Fujimori
Derechos humanos
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos
Empoderamiento judicial
Independencia judicial
Judicialización
Cultura jurídica
Justicia transicional
Accountability
Conventionality control
Human rights
Inter-American Court of Human Rights
Judicial empowerment
Judicial independency
Judicialization
Legal education
Transitional justice
Descripción
Sumario:Alberto Fujimori, Peruvian ex-president and perpetrator of human rights violations, was released from prison due to a presidential pardon in 2017. He was also granted immunity from prosecution. Although the political branches and the majority of the population supported these measures, as shown by public opinion polls, within months domestic courts overturned them completely, relying on standards set by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. This is the most unlikely result, comparatively. The article examines what could explain this pro human rights accountability behaviour in the judiciary. It argues that the outcome could be the product of two processes initialised during the Peruvian transition: Judicial empowerment (independence and power gains) and legal culture shift from positivism to neo-constitutionalism. Both are defined and analysed with reference to transitional justice and socio-legal studies scholarship. The article further seeks to identify the conditions under which Inter-American conventionality control doctrine could have a strong domestic impact.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).