The Law on Earth, or the Importance of the Beginning of the Land Border to Define Maritime Borders. The Case between Peru and Chile

Descripción del Articulo

This paper develops the importance of the delimitation of the point of beginning of the terrestrial border to define the maritime borders; in addition, it determines the location of this point in the case of the border between Peru and Chile, which, in turn, initiates the maritime border of the same...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Novak Talavera, Fabián, García-Corrochano Moyano, Luis
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2008
Institución:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistaspuc:article/3184
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/3184
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Land Border
Maritime Border
International Public Law
Customs
Law of Treaties
Dry Coast
Frontera Terrestre
Frontera Marítima
Derecho Internacional Público
Costumbre
Derecho de los Tratados
Costa Seca
id REVPUCP_061dd5b97a8a1ef7a23009b2bc48e816
oai_identifier_str oai:revistaspuc:article/3184
network_acronym_str REVPUCP
network_name_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Law on Earth, or the Importance of the Beginning of the Land Border to Define Maritime Borders. The Case between Peru and Chile
El derecho en la tierra, o la importancia del inicio de la frontera terrestre para definir fronteras marítimas. El caso entre el Perú y Chile
title The Law on Earth, or the Importance of the Beginning of the Land Border to Define Maritime Borders. The Case between Peru and Chile
spellingShingle The Law on Earth, or the Importance of the Beginning of the Land Border to Define Maritime Borders. The Case between Peru and Chile
Novak Talavera, Fabián
Land Border
Maritime Border
International Public Law
Customs
Law of Treaties
Dry Coast
Frontera Terrestre
Frontera Marítima
Derecho Internacional Público
Costumbre
Derecho de los Tratados
Costa Seca
title_short The Law on Earth, or the Importance of the Beginning of the Land Border to Define Maritime Borders. The Case between Peru and Chile
title_full The Law on Earth, or the Importance of the Beginning of the Land Border to Define Maritime Borders. The Case between Peru and Chile
title_fullStr The Law on Earth, or the Importance of the Beginning of the Land Border to Define Maritime Borders. The Case between Peru and Chile
title_full_unstemmed The Law on Earth, or the Importance of the Beginning of the Land Border to Define Maritime Borders. The Case between Peru and Chile
title_sort The Law on Earth, or the Importance of the Beginning of the Land Border to Define Maritime Borders. The Case between Peru and Chile
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Novak Talavera, Fabián
García-Corrochano Moyano, Luis
author Novak Talavera, Fabián
author_facet Novak Talavera, Fabián
García-Corrochano Moyano, Luis
author_role author
author2 García-Corrochano Moyano, Luis
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Land Border
Maritime Border
International Public Law
Customs
Law of Treaties
Dry Coast
Frontera Terrestre
Frontera Marítima
Derecho Internacional Público
Costumbre
Derecho de los Tratados
Costa Seca
topic Land Border
Maritime Border
International Public Law
Customs
Law of Treaties
Dry Coast
Frontera Terrestre
Frontera Marítima
Derecho Internacional Público
Costumbre
Derecho de los Tratados
Costa Seca
description This paper develops the importance of the delimitation of the point of beginning of the terrestrial border to define the maritime borders; in addition, it determines the location of this point in the case of the border between Peru and Chile, which, in turn, initiates the maritime border of the same. In this sense, the author develops, first, the analysis of the Treaty and Supplementary Protocol to resolve the issue of Tacna and Arica of 1929 and the demarcation made by the Mixed Boundary Commission between Peru and Chile in 1930. two ideas conclude: i) in the face of disagreements between the delegates of both countries during the demarcation, it is the governments of both States that directly solve these discrepancies and ii) according to the treaty of 1929 and the demarcation made in 1930, it is the Concordia which starts the land border. Secondly, it analyzes the Chilean position with respect to the Treaty and Complementary Protocol to resolve the issue of Tacna and Arica, specifically, the position it adopts since 2001 regarding the beginning of the land border. Indeed, Chile, since 2001, claims that the beginning of the land boundary is Milestone No. 1. It is necessary to mention that this new position contradicts the principles of international law, such as the principle pacta sunt servanda, the principle of good faith, among others. In the third place, the author establishes the consequences of the Chilean thesis, since this generates legal as well as geographical absurdities, such as the formation of a "dry coast". Finally, the starting point of the land border between Peru and Chile is established, which is followed by the Treaty to resolve the issue of Tacna and Arica, and what is its relevance in the delimitation of the maritime border of those countries.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-12-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/3184
10.18800/derechopucp.200801.008
url http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/3184
identifier_str_mv 10.18800/derechopucp.200801.008
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/3184/3002
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho PUCP
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho PUCP
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Derecho PUCP; Núm. 61 (2008): Violencia y Derecho; 193-206
2305-2546
0251-3420
reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron:PUCP
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
instacron_str PUCP
institution PUCP
reponame_str Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
collection Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1840900762860781568
spelling The Law on Earth, or the Importance of the Beginning of the Land Border to Define Maritime Borders. The Case between Peru and ChileEl derecho en la tierra, o la importancia del inicio de la frontera terrestre para definir fronteras marítimas. El caso entre el Perú y ChileNovak Talavera, FabiánGarcía-Corrochano Moyano, LuisLand BorderMaritime BorderInternational Public LawCustomsLaw of TreatiesDry CoastFrontera TerrestreFrontera MarítimaDerecho Internacional PúblicoCostumbreDerecho de los TratadosCosta SecaThis paper develops the importance of the delimitation of the point of beginning of the terrestrial border to define the maritime borders; in addition, it determines the location of this point in the case of the border between Peru and Chile, which, in turn, initiates the maritime border of the same. In this sense, the author develops, first, the analysis of the Treaty and Supplementary Protocol to resolve the issue of Tacna and Arica of 1929 and the demarcation made by the Mixed Boundary Commission between Peru and Chile in 1930. two ideas conclude: i) in the face of disagreements between the delegates of both countries during the demarcation, it is the governments of both States that directly solve these discrepancies and ii) according to the treaty of 1929 and the demarcation made in 1930, it is the Concordia which starts the land border. Secondly, it analyzes the Chilean position with respect to the Treaty and Complementary Protocol to resolve the issue of Tacna and Arica, specifically, the position it adopts since 2001 regarding the beginning of the land border. Indeed, Chile, since 2001, claims that the beginning of the land boundary is Milestone No. 1. It is necessary to mention that this new position contradicts the principles of international law, such as the principle pacta sunt servanda, the principle of good faith, among others. In the third place, the author establishes the consequences of the Chilean thesis, since this generates legal as well as geographical absurdities, such as the formation of a "dry coast". Finally, the starting point of the land border between Peru and Chile is established, which is followed by the Treaty to resolve the issue of Tacna and Arica, and what is its relevance in the delimitation of the maritime border of those countries.El presente trabajo desarrolla la importancia de la delimitación del punto de inicio de la frontera terrestre para la definir las fronteras marítimas; además, determina la ubicación de este punto en el caso de la frontera entre Perú y Chile, el cual, a su vez, da inicio a la frontera marítima de los mismos. En tal sentido, el autor desarrolla, en primer lugar, el análisis del Tratado y Protocolo Complementario para resolver la cuestión de Tacna y Arica de 1929 y el de la demarcación realizada por la Comisión Mixta de Límites entre el Perú y Chile en 1930. Se concluyen dos ideas: i) ante los desacuerdos entre los delegados de ambos países durante la demarcación, son los gobiernos de ambos Estados quienes solucionan de manera directa estas discrepancias y ii) según el tratado de 1929 y la demarcación realizada en 1930, es el punto Concordia el que da inicio a la frontera terrestre. En segundo lugar, analiza la postura chilena con respeto al Tratado y Protocolo Complementario para resolver la cuestión de Tacna y Arica, en específico, la posición que adopta desde el 2001 respecto al inicio de la frontera terrestre. En efecto, Chile, desde 2001, alega que el inicio de la frontera terrestre es el Hito N° 1. Es necesario mencionar que esta nueva postura contradice los principios del derecho internacional, tales como, el principio pacta sunt servanda, el principio de la buena fe, entre otros. En tercer lugar, el autor establece cuales son las consecuencias de la tesis chilena, pues esta genera absurdos tanto jurídicos, como geográficos, como es el caso de la formación de una «costa seca». Finalmente, se establece el punto de inicio de la frontera terrestre entre Perú y Chile, el cual se sigue del Tratado para resolver la cuestión de Tacna y Arica, y cuál es su relevancia en la delimitación de la frontera marítima de dichos países.Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú2008-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/318410.18800/derechopucp.200801.008Derecho PUCP; Núm. 61 (2008): Violencia y Derecho; 193-2062305-25460251-3420reponame:Revistas - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perúinstacron:PUCPspahttp://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/3184/3002Derechos de autor 2016 Derecho PUCPhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistaspuc:article/31842025-01-14T23:05:30Z
score 12.8608675
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).