Judicial function and the commons: the contribution of legal deontology
Descripción del Articulo
The article attempts to provide an in-depth study of the concept of profesional deontology with the aim of updating it and allowing it to break free from a crisis of ethics and sense of justice that seems overwhelming. At present, a number of perspectives have been disseminated that strip the work o...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2012 |
Institución: | Poder Judicial del Perú |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/289 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/289 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Jurist Work Professional deontology Justice, common good Jurista Trabajo Deontología profesional Justicia Bien común |
id |
REVPJ_5d6515188caab0b475e7b0cfbc55b8c2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/289 |
network_acronym_str |
REVPJ |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Judicial function and the commons: the contribution of legal deontologyFunción judicial y bien común: la aportación de la Deontología JurídicaSartea, ClaudiaJuristWorkProfessional deontologyJustice, common goodJuristaTrabajoDeontología profesionalJusticiaBien comúnThe article attempts to provide an in-depth study of the concept of profesional deontology with the aim of updating it and allowing it to break free from a crisis of ethics and sense of justice that seems overwhelming. At present, a number of perspectives have been disseminated that strip the work of professionals (the work of legal professionals and particularly of judges as well) from any reference to a common good, reducing it, according to each case, to a simple relationship between persons (more or less economically relevant), whereby everything is subject to negotiation or to the manifestation of a public power that controls and regulates all things, paradoxically ending up by removing the professional liability. The very concept of profesional work must be studied in depth, particularly with respect to the idea and specific function of the professions involved in the administration of justice until we achieve a professional work model, in which the person who exercises it, will know and perceive that it is their personal identity which is at stake: only then rules will make sense and achieve their purpose, which is to encourage everyone to conscientiously develop their social role and participate in the attainment of the common goodEl artículo intenta profundizar en el concepto de deontología profesional para ponerlo al día y permitirle salir de una crisis de eticidad y sentido de la justicia que parece arrolladora. En la actualidad, se han difundido perspectivas que quitan al trabajo profesional (también al trabajo de los profesionales del derecho, especialmente de los jueces) toda referencia al bien común, reduciéndolo según los casos a simple relación entre sujetos (más o menos económicamente relevante), en la que todo es objeto de negociación, o también a manifestación de un poder público que todo lo controla y reglamenta, acabando paradójicamente por desresponsabilizar a los profesionales. Hay que profundizar en el concepto mismo de trabajo profesional, especialmente, por lo que nos interesa aquí, en la idea y función específica de las profesiones de administración de la justicia, hasta llegar a un modelo de trabajo profesional en el que quien lo ejerce sepa y perciba que está en juego su misma identidad personal: solamente así las reglas cobrarán su sentido y lograrán su fin, que es el de empujar a cada uno a desarrollar acabadamente su papel social y de esta forma a participar por lo que le toca a la realización del bien comúnPoder Judicial del Perú2012-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/28910.35292/ropj.v7i8/9.289Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol 7 No 8/9 (2012); 347-361Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 7 Núm. 8/9 (2012); 347-361Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; v. 7 n. 8/9 (2012); 347-3612663-91301997-668210.35292/ropj.v7i8/9reponame:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perúinstname:Poder Judicial del Perúinstacron:PJspahttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/289/338Derechos de autor 2012 Claudia Sarteahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/2892021-12-12T16:50:50Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Judicial function and the commons: the contribution of legal deontology Función judicial y bien común: la aportación de la Deontología Jurídica |
title |
Judicial function and the commons: the contribution of legal deontology |
spellingShingle |
Judicial function and the commons: the contribution of legal deontology Sartea, Claudia Jurist Work Professional deontology Justice, common good Jurista Trabajo Deontología profesional Justicia Bien común |
title_short |
Judicial function and the commons: the contribution of legal deontology |
title_full |
Judicial function and the commons: the contribution of legal deontology |
title_fullStr |
Judicial function and the commons: the contribution of legal deontology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Judicial function and the commons: the contribution of legal deontology |
title_sort |
Judicial function and the commons: the contribution of legal deontology |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Sartea, Claudia |
author |
Sartea, Claudia |
author_facet |
Sartea, Claudia |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Jurist Work Professional deontology Justice, common good Jurista Trabajo Deontología profesional Justicia Bien común |
topic |
Jurist Work Professional deontology Justice, common good Jurista Trabajo Deontología profesional Justicia Bien común |
description |
The article attempts to provide an in-depth study of the concept of profesional deontology with the aim of updating it and allowing it to break free from a crisis of ethics and sense of justice that seems overwhelming. At present, a number of perspectives have been disseminated that strip the work of professionals (the work of legal professionals and particularly of judges as well) from any reference to a common good, reducing it, according to each case, to a simple relationship between persons (more or less economically relevant), whereby everything is subject to negotiation or to the manifestation of a public power that controls and regulates all things, paradoxically ending up by removing the professional liability. The very concept of profesional work must be studied in depth, particularly with respect to the idea and specific function of the professions involved in the administration of justice until we achieve a professional work model, in which the person who exercises it, will know and perceive that it is their personal identity which is at stake: only then rules will make sense and achieve their purpose, which is to encourage everyone to conscientiously develop their social role and participate in the attainment of the common good |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-12-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/289 10.35292/ropj.v7i8/9.289 |
url |
https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/289 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.35292/ropj.v7i8/9.289 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/289/338 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2012 Claudia Sartea https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2012 Claudia Sartea https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Poder Judicial del Perú |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Poder Judicial del Perú |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol 7 No 8/9 (2012); 347-361 Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 7 Núm. 8/9 (2012); 347-361 Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; v. 7 n. 8/9 (2012); 347-361 2663-9130 1997-6682 10.35292/ropj.v7i8/9 reponame:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú instname:Poder Judicial del Perú instacron:PJ |
instname_str |
Poder Judicial del Perú |
instacron_str |
PJ |
institution |
PJ |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
collection |
Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1842360643216211968 |
score |
12.87381 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).