The positioning of the theory of mediated authorship by organization in Peruvian jurisprudence. Analysis of the dogmatic legal theory of the Supreme Court's decision against Alberto Fujimori

Descripción del Articulo

In a historical ruling, unprecedented in national law, and one of the most relevant sentences in international case law, the National Criminal Division of the Supreme Court of Peru convicted the former president Alberto Fujimori Fujimori as the indirect perpetrator of crimes against humanity, essent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Pariona Arana, Raúl
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2011
Institución:Poder Judicial del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/205
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/205
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:indirect perpetratorship
organized power structures
power over the organization
commanding power
fungibility
willingness to comply with the wishes of the executor
crimes against humanity
autoría mediata
aparatos de poder organizados
dominio sobre la organización
poder de mando
fungibilidad
elevada disposición al hecho del ejecutor
crímenes contra la humanidad
id REVPJ_2511528b1ad58c7c4d55db98b8fc9f0d
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/205
network_acronym_str REVPJ
network_name_str Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling The positioning of the theory of mediated authorship by organization in Peruvian jurisprudence. Analysis of the dogmatic legal theory of the Supreme Court's decision against Alberto FujimoriEl posicionamiento de la teoría de la autoría mediata por organización en la jurisprudencia peruana. Análisis de la fundamentación dogmática de la Sentencia de la Corte Suprema contra Alberto FujimoriPariona Arana, Raúlindirect perpetratorshiporganized power structurespower over the organizationcommanding powerfungibilitywillingness to comply with the wishes of the executorcrimes against humanityautoría mediataaparatos de poder organizadosdominio sobre la organizaciónpoder de mandofungibilidadelevada disposición al hecho del ejecutorcrímenes contra la humanidadIn a historical ruling, unprecedented in national law, and one of the most relevant sentences in international case law, the National Criminal Division of the Supreme Court of Peru convicted the former president Alberto Fujimori Fujimori as the indirect perpetrator of crimes against humanity, essentially on the grounds of the theory of the indirect perpetrator by organization, to judge those crimes perpetrated through organized power structures. The study recalls the origin and background of the theory, analyzing and providing critical opinions on the grounds of the sentence in relation to the criminal participation of the former Peruvian head of state, which sets the bases for national case law and consolidates the indirect perpetratorship in our midst.En histórica sentencia, sin precedentes en la jurisprudencia nacional, y una de las más relevantes de la jurisprudencia internacional, la Sala Penal Nacional de la Corte Suprema de la República condenó al expresidente Alberto Fujimori Fujimori como autor mediato de crímenes contra la humanidad, basándose esencialmente dicho fallo en la teoría de la autoría mediata por organización para el enjuiciamiento de los crímenes cometidos desde aparatos organizados de poder. El estudio realiza un recuento del origen y los antecedentes de la teoría. Se analizan y formulan apreciaciones críticas a la amplia fundamentación de la sentencia respecto a la participación criminal que desplegó el ex mandatario peruano, la misma que sienta ya las bases de una doctrina jurisprudencial nacional y consolida la autoría mediata en nuestro medio.Poder Judicial del Perú2011-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/20510.35292/ropj.v6i6/7.205Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 6 Núm. 6/7 (2010); 291-3022663-91301997-668210.35292/ropj.v6i6/7reponame:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perúinstname:Poder Judicial del Perúinstacron:PJspahttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/205/260info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/2052021-07-16T04:51:01Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The positioning of the theory of mediated authorship by organization in Peruvian jurisprudence. Analysis of the dogmatic legal theory of the Supreme Court's decision against Alberto Fujimori
El posicionamiento de la teoría de la autoría mediata por organización en la jurisprudencia peruana. Análisis de la fundamentación dogmática de la Sentencia de la Corte Suprema contra Alberto Fujimori
title The positioning of the theory of mediated authorship by organization in Peruvian jurisprudence. Analysis of the dogmatic legal theory of the Supreme Court's decision against Alberto Fujimori
spellingShingle The positioning of the theory of mediated authorship by organization in Peruvian jurisprudence. Analysis of the dogmatic legal theory of the Supreme Court's decision against Alberto Fujimori
Pariona Arana, Raúl
indirect perpetratorship
organized power structures
power over the organization
commanding power
fungibility
willingness to comply with the wishes of the executor
crimes against humanity
autoría mediata
aparatos de poder organizados
dominio sobre la organización
poder de mando
fungibilidad
elevada disposición al hecho del ejecutor
crímenes contra la humanidad
title_short The positioning of the theory of mediated authorship by organization in Peruvian jurisprudence. Analysis of the dogmatic legal theory of the Supreme Court's decision against Alberto Fujimori
title_full The positioning of the theory of mediated authorship by organization in Peruvian jurisprudence. Analysis of the dogmatic legal theory of the Supreme Court's decision against Alberto Fujimori
title_fullStr The positioning of the theory of mediated authorship by organization in Peruvian jurisprudence. Analysis of the dogmatic legal theory of the Supreme Court's decision against Alberto Fujimori
title_full_unstemmed The positioning of the theory of mediated authorship by organization in Peruvian jurisprudence. Analysis of the dogmatic legal theory of the Supreme Court's decision against Alberto Fujimori
title_sort The positioning of the theory of mediated authorship by organization in Peruvian jurisprudence. Analysis of the dogmatic legal theory of the Supreme Court's decision against Alberto Fujimori
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Pariona Arana, Raúl
author Pariona Arana, Raúl
author_facet Pariona Arana, Raúl
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv indirect perpetratorship
organized power structures
power over the organization
commanding power
fungibility
willingness to comply with the wishes of the executor
crimes against humanity
autoría mediata
aparatos de poder organizados
dominio sobre la organización
poder de mando
fungibilidad
elevada disposición al hecho del ejecutor
crímenes contra la humanidad
topic indirect perpetratorship
organized power structures
power over the organization
commanding power
fungibility
willingness to comply with the wishes of the executor
crimes against humanity
autoría mediata
aparatos de poder organizados
dominio sobre la organización
poder de mando
fungibilidad
elevada disposición al hecho del ejecutor
crímenes contra la humanidad
description In a historical ruling, unprecedented in national law, and one of the most relevant sentences in international case law, the National Criminal Division of the Supreme Court of Peru convicted the former president Alberto Fujimori Fujimori as the indirect perpetrator of crimes against humanity, essentially on the grounds of the theory of the indirect perpetrator by organization, to judge those crimes perpetrated through organized power structures. The study recalls the origin and background of the theory, analyzing and providing critical opinions on the grounds of the sentence in relation to the criminal participation of the former Peruvian head of state, which sets the bases for national case law and consolidates the indirect perpetratorship in our midst.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-06-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/205
10.35292/ropj.v6i6/7.205
url https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/205
identifier_str_mv 10.35292/ropj.v6i6/7.205
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/205/260
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Poder Judicial del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Poder Judicial del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 6 Núm. 6/7 (2010); 291-302
2663-9130
1997-6682
10.35292/ropj.v6i6/7
reponame:Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
instname:Poder Judicial del Perú
instacron:PJ
instname_str Poder Judicial del Perú
instacron_str PJ
institution PJ
reponame_str Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
collection Revistas - Poder Judicial del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1844260839449690112
score 12.786251
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).