Psychometric properties of Colquitt’s Organizational Justice Scale in Argentine workers

Descripción del Articulo

Organizational justice refers to workers’ perceptions of what is fair and unfair in their workplaces. The aim of the present study was to provide evidence of the factorial validity and psychometric properties of the Argentine version of Colquitt’s Organizational Justice Scale. To achieve this object...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Omar, Alicia, Salessi, Solana, Vaamonde, Juan Diego, Urteaga, Florencia
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2018
Institución:Universidad de San Martín de Porres
Repositorio:Liberabit
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs2.ojs3.revistaliberabit.com:article/114
Enlace del recurso:http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/114
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:justice
organizations
confirmatory factor analysis
validity
Argentine workers
Descripción
Sumario:Organizational justice refers to workers’ perceptions of what is fair and unfair in their workplaces. The aim of the present study was to provide evidence of the factorial validity and psychometric properties of the Argentine version of Colquitt’s Organizational Justice Scale. To achieve this objective, an empirical, quantitative, instrumental study with a cross-sectional design was conducted. Data were obtained from a convenience sample of 406 employees (212 men and 194 women) of different Argentine organizations. Confirmatory factor analysis results supported the four-factor structure of the scale (distributive, procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice). The instrument showed good reliability indices (ordinal alpha and composite reliability values greater than .80) and adequate discriminant and convergent validity (average variance extracted indices greater than .60). These psychometric characteristics make the validated scale a useful tool to measure justice perceptions within Argentine organizations.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).