Equity Judgments: Context Effects in Gains and Losses

Descripción del Articulo

Background: Previous studies have evaluated mathematical models of equity judgments of two hypothetical employees with distinct merits. They found that the model of proportionality adequately described the data based on an algebraic additive rule of information integration. Nevertheless, there is a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Reyes-Contreras, Raul, Santoyo Velasco, Carlos
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2022
Institución:Universidad de San Martín de Porres
Repositorio:Liberabit
Lenguaje:inglés
español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs2.ojs3.revistaliberabit.com:article/534
Enlace del recurso:http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/534
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:teoría de integración de información
juicios de equidad
psicofísica social
ganancias monetarias
pérdidas monetarias
id REVLI_87a7aeb767424cbd9f734739736cf679
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.ojs3.revistaliberabit.com:article/534
network_acronym_str REVLI
network_name_str Liberabit
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Equity Judgments: Context Effects in Gains and Losses
Juicios de equidad: efectos de contexto en ganancias y pérdidas
Julgamentos de equidade: efeitos contextuais no lucro e na perda
title Equity Judgments: Context Effects in Gains and Losses
spellingShingle Equity Judgments: Context Effects in Gains and Losses
Reyes-Contreras, Raul
teoría de integración de información
juicios de equidad
psicofísica social
ganancias monetarias
pérdidas monetarias
title_short Equity Judgments: Context Effects in Gains and Losses
title_full Equity Judgments: Context Effects in Gains and Losses
title_fullStr Equity Judgments: Context Effects in Gains and Losses
title_full_unstemmed Equity Judgments: Context Effects in Gains and Losses
title_sort Equity Judgments: Context Effects in Gains and Losses
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Reyes-Contreras, Raul
Santoyo Velasco, Carlos
author Reyes-Contreras, Raul
author_facet Reyes-Contreras, Raul
Santoyo Velasco, Carlos
author_role author
author2 Santoyo Velasco, Carlos
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv teoría de integración de información
juicios de equidad
psicofísica social
ganancias monetarias
pérdidas monetarias
topic teoría de integración de información
juicios de equidad
psicofísica social
ganancias monetarias
pérdidas monetarias
description Background: Previous studies have evaluated mathematical models of equity judgments of two hypothetical employees with distinct merits. They found that the model of proportionality adequately described the data based on an algebraic additive rule of information integration. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence concerning the effect of a context of monetary losses on the rules of information integration. Objective: To assess the effect of monetary gains and losses on equity judgments, and the effect of the personal context in which the participants are involved in decision-making. Method: A repeated measures design with within-subjects factors was utilized: 7 levels of A’s merit x 5 levels of B’s merit x 2 contexts (gains and losses) x 2 between-subject factors (third-party allocation and self-allocation). Results: Statistically significant differences appeared between thirdparty allocation and self-allocation conditions for gains [F (1,38) = 216.18, p < .001, η2P = .85] and losses [F (1,38) = 110.45, p < .001, η2P = .71]. Conclusions: The additive rules of integration appeared in the gains scenario while the subtractive rules together with an aversion to inequity were observed in the losses context. Authorship Contribution RRC: Conception and design of the study, collection and interpretation of data, discussion, and final revision of the manuscript. CSV: Interpretation of data, discussion, and final revision of the manuscript.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-09-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/534
10.24265/liberabit.2022.v28n2.534
url http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/534
identifier_str_mv 10.24265/liberabit.2022.v28n2.534
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
spa
language eng
spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/534/389
http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/534/428
http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/534/449
http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/534/467
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2022 Raul Reyes-Contreras, Carlos Santoyo Velasco
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2022 Raul Reyes-Contreras, Carlos Santoyo Velasco
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
application/xml
application/epub+zip
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de San Martín de Porres
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de San Martín de Porres
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv LIBERABIT. Revista Peruana de Psicología; Vol. 28 Núm. 2 (2022): julio - diciembre; e534
LIBERABIT. Revista Peruana de Psicología; Vol. 28 Núm. 2 (2022): julio - diciembre; e534
LIBERABIT. Revista Peruana de Psicología; Vol. 28 Núm. 2 (2022): julio - diciembre; e534
2223-7666
1729-4827
reponame:Liberabit
instname:Universidad de San Martín de Porres
instacron:USMP
instname_str Universidad de San Martín de Porres
instacron_str USMP
institution USMP
reponame_str Liberabit
collection Liberabit
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1846887768888705024
spelling Equity Judgments: Context Effects in Gains and LossesJuicios de equidad: efectos de contexto en ganancias y pérdidasJulgamentos de equidade: efeitos contextuais no lucro e na perdaReyes-Contreras, RaulSantoyo Velasco, Carlosteoría de integración de informaciónjuicios de equidadpsicofísica socialganancias monetariaspérdidas monetariasBackground: Previous studies have evaluated mathematical models of equity judgments of two hypothetical employees with distinct merits. They found that the model of proportionality adequately described the data based on an algebraic additive rule of information integration. Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence concerning the effect of a context of monetary losses on the rules of information integration. Objective: To assess the effect of monetary gains and losses on equity judgments, and the effect of the personal context in which the participants are involved in decision-making. Method: A repeated measures design with within-subjects factors was utilized: 7 levels of A’s merit x 5 levels of B’s merit x 2 contexts (gains and losses) x 2 between-subject factors (third-party allocation and self-allocation). Results: Statistically significant differences appeared between thirdparty allocation and self-allocation conditions for gains [F (1,38) = 216.18, p < .001, η2P = .85] and losses [F (1,38) = 110.45, p < .001, η2P = .71]. Conclusions: The additive rules of integration appeared in the gains scenario while the subtractive rules together with an aversion to inequity were observed in the losses context. Authorship Contribution RRC: Conception and design of the study, collection and interpretation of data, discussion, and final revision of the manuscript. CSV: Interpretation of data, discussion, and final revision of the manuscript.Antecedentes: estudios previos evaluaron modelos matemáticos sobre juicios de equidad en dos empleados hipotéticos que diferían en sus niveles de mérito. Estos encontraron que el modelo de proporcionalidad describía adecuadamente los datos basándose en una regla algebraica aditiva de integración de información. Sin embargo, existe una falta de evidencia sobre el efecto del contexto de las pérdidas monetarias sobre las reglas de integración de información. Objetivo: evaluar el efecto del contexto de ganancias y pérdidas monetarias sobre los juicios de equidad, y el efecto del contexto personal en donde el participante se ve involucrado en la toma de decisiones. Método: se empleó un diseño de medidas repetidas con los factores intrasujeto: 7 niveles de mérito de A x 5 niveles de mérito de B x 2 contextos (ganancias y pérdidas) x 2 factores intersujeto (distribución a terceros y distribución propia). Resultados: se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre las condiciones de asignación a terceros y asignación propia en relación con las ganancias[F (1,38) = 216.18, p < .001, η2P = .85] y pérdidas [F (1,38) = 110.45, p < .001, η2P = .71]. Conclusiones: las reglas aditivas de integración aparecieron en el contexto de las ganancias, mientras que las reglas sustractivas, así como aversión a la inequidad, se observaron en el contexto de las pérdidas. Autoría Contribución RRC: Concepción y diseño del estudio, recogida e interpretación de los datos, discusión y revisión final del manuscrito. CSV: Interpretación de los datos, discusión y revisión final del manuscrito.Antecedentes: Estudos anteriores avaliaram modelos matemáticos de julgamentos de justiça em dois funcionários hipotéticos que se diferenciavam em seus níveis de mérito. Eles descobriram que o modelo de proporcionalidade descrevia adequadamente os dados com base em uma regra algébrica aditiva de integração de informações. Entretanto, há uma falta de provas sobre o efeito do contexto de perda monetária nas regras de integração de informações. Objetivo: avaliar o efeito do contexto de ganhos e perdas monetários nos julgamentos de justiça, e o efeito do contexto pessoal no qual o participante está envolvido na tomada de decisões. Método: foi utilizado um desenho de medidas repetidas com os fatores intrasubjetivos: 7 níveis de mérito de A x 5 níveis de mérito de B x 2 contextos (ganhos e perdas) x 2 fatores intersubjetivos (distribuição de terceiros e auto-distribuição). Resultados: foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre a alocação de terceiros e as próprias condições de alocação em relação aos ganhos[F (1,38) = 216.18, p < .001, η2P = .85] e perdas[F (1,38) = 110.45, p < .001, η2P = .71]. Conclusões: Regras aditivas de integração apareceram no contexto dos ganhos, enquanto regras subtrativas, assim como a aversão à desigualdade, foram observadas no contexto das perdas. Contribuição da Autoria RRC: Concepção e desenho do estudo, coleta e interpretação dos dados, discussão, e revisão final do manuscrito. CSV: Interpretação dos dados, discussão, e revisão final do manuscrito.Universidad de San Martín de Porres2022-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/xmlapplication/epub+ziphttp://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/53410.24265/liberabit.2022.v28n2.534LIBERABIT. Revista Peruana de Psicología; Vol. 28 Núm. 2 (2022): julio - diciembre; e534LIBERABIT. Revista Peruana de Psicología; Vol. 28 Núm. 2 (2022): julio - diciembre; e534LIBERABIT. Revista Peruana de Psicología; Vol. 28 Núm. 2 (2022): julio - diciembre; e5342223-76661729-4827reponame:Liberabitinstname:Universidad de San Martín de Porresinstacron:USMPengspahttp://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/534/389http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/534/428http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/534/449http://www.revistaliberabit.com/index.php/Liberabit/article/view/534/467Derechos de autor 2022 Raul Reyes-Contreras, Carlos Santoyo Velascohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs2.ojs3.revistaliberabit.com:article/5342022-08-29T16:25:46Z
score 12.688246
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).