Clinical characteristics and care times in a chest pain unit of the emergency department of an argentine center

Descripción del Articulo

Objectives. To report the frequency of precordial pain, describe clinical characteristics, and care times. Methods. Retrospective descriptive study that  included consultations in the Chest Pain  Unit in 2021 in the emergency department of a private hospital in Argentina. Results. There were 1469 ad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Grande Ratti, María Florencia, Bluro, Ignacio Martín, Castillo, Fiorella, Zapiola, María Elena, Pedretti, Ana Soledad, Martínez, Bernardo
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2023
Institución:Instituto Nacional Cardiovascular
Repositorio:Archivos peruanos de cardiología y cirugía cardiovascular
Lenguaje:español
inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.apcyccv.org.pe:article/293
Enlace del recurso:https://apcyccv.org.pe/index.php/apccc/article/view/293
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Urgencias Médicas
Atención de Enfermería
Manejo de Atención al Paciente
Dolor en el Pecho
Cardiología
Emergencies, Hospital
Nursing Care
Patient Care Management
Chest Pain
Cardiology
Descripción
Sumario:Objectives. To report the frequency of precordial pain, describe clinical characteristics, and care times. Methods. Retrospective descriptive study that  included consultations in the Chest Pain  Unit in 2021 in the emergency department of a private hospital in Argentina. Results. There were 1469 admissions for chest pain, yielding a frequency of 1.09% (95%CI 1.04-1.15). They were 52% men, mean age 62 years (SD ±15); 48% had hypertension and 32% dyslipidemia. The median time to initial ECG was 4.3 min (ICR 2.5-7.5); and 26 min (ICR 14-46) to medical evaluation. A total of 206 (14%) were hospitalized with a median of 3 days, 76% were admitted to a closed unit, 9% required non-invasive ventilation/mechanical ventilaction and in-hospital mortality was 2.9%. Those hospitalized presented shorter delay time to medical attention (p<0.01), and greater performance of complementary studies (p<0.01), with no differences in time to ECG (p=0.22). Conclusions. Care times were within the stipulated standards, being an important indicator of quality. Nursing was crucial, taking care of the correct triage, ECG on admission, and guaranteeing care until medical evaluation.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).