Constructivism in the pedagogical and epistemological conceptions of teachers

Descripción del Articulo

In recent years, pedagogical constructivism has enjoyed great popularity, so that many people recognize themselves as constructivists. In the literature it was found that many teachers reported having conceptions aligned to this paradigm, however, the results are contradictory in this regard. In thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Vargas, Kenia, Acuña, John
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Instituto Universitario de Innovación Ciencia y Tecnología Inudi Perú
Repositorio:Revista Innova Educación
Lenguaje:español
inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs2.revistainnovaeducacion.com:article/119
Enlace del recurso:https://revistainnovaeducacion.com/index.php/rie/article/view/119
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Constructivismo
Concepciones docentes
revisión sistemática
Constructivism
teaching conceptions
systematic review
id REVIE_6e05521736dd735e49081b4e63071ce7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.revistainnovaeducacion.com:article/119
network_acronym_str REVIE
network_name_str Revista Innova Educación
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Constructivism in the pedagogical and epistemological conceptions of teachers
El constructivismo en las concepciones pedagógicas y epistemológicas de los profesores
title Constructivism in the pedagogical and epistemological conceptions of teachers
spellingShingle Constructivism in the pedagogical and epistemological conceptions of teachers
Vargas, Kenia
Constructivismo
Concepciones docentes
revisión sistemática
Constructivism
teaching conceptions
systematic review
title_short Constructivism in the pedagogical and epistemological conceptions of teachers
title_full Constructivism in the pedagogical and epistemological conceptions of teachers
title_fullStr Constructivism in the pedagogical and epistemological conceptions of teachers
title_full_unstemmed Constructivism in the pedagogical and epistemological conceptions of teachers
title_sort Constructivism in the pedagogical and epistemological conceptions of teachers
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Vargas, Kenia
Acuña, John
author Vargas, Kenia
author_facet Vargas, Kenia
Acuña, John
author_role author
author2 Acuña, John
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Constructivismo
Concepciones docentes
revisión sistemática
Constructivism
teaching conceptions
systematic review
topic Constructivismo
Concepciones docentes
revisión sistemática
Constructivism
teaching conceptions
systematic review
description In recent years, pedagogical constructivism has enjoyed great popularity, so that many people recognize themselves as constructivists. In the literature it was found that many teachers reported having conceptions aligned to this paradigm, however, the results are contradictory in this regard. In this sense, the purpose of this work was to deepen the results of such research on teaching conceptions, specifically tracing a constructivist view of their practice, as well as the recommendations that the experts have made with regard to these results. A systematic review of the literature was carried out. Documents were searched in the Dialnet database. After applying different filters and assessing the relevance of the articles, 13 works were admitted for qualitative and quantitative analysis. Among the main results, it is emphasized that teachers maintain epistemological and pedagogical conceptions formed by different paradigms, which are not always coherent with each other, but present diffuse limits. For this reason, interventions are recommended that: 1) review paradigmatic differences at the theoretical level, 2) allow teachers to reflect on their conceptions and help them to externalize them, and 3) implement practical models in accordance with institutionally desirable scientific or pedagogical paradigms. It presents theoretical material organized with respect to constructivism to guide the first two phases.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-14
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistainnovaeducacion.com/index.php/rie/article/view/119
10.35622/j.rie.2020.04.004
url https://revistainnovaeducacion.com/index.php/rie/article/view/119
identifier_str_mv 10.35622/j.rie.2020.04.004
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
eng
language spa
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistainnovaeducacion.com/index.php/rie/article/view/119/184
https://revistainnovaeducacion.com/index.php/rie/article/view/119/186
https://revistainnovaeducacion.com/index.php/rie/article/view/119/501
https://revistainnovaeducacion.com/index.php/rie/article/view/119/502
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2020 Kenia Vargas, John Acuña
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2020 Kenia Vargas, John Acuña
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
audio/mpeg
audio/mpeg
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Universitario de Innovación Ciencia y Tecnología Inudi Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto Universitario de Innovación Ciencia y Tecnología Inudi Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Innova Educación; Vol. 2 Núm. 4 (2020); 555-575
2664-1496
2664-1488
reponame:Revista Innova Educación
instname:Instituto Universitario de Innovación Ciencia y Tecnología Inudi Perú
instacron:INUDI
instname_str Instituto Universitario de Innovación Ciencia y Tecnología Inudi Perú
instacron_str INUDI
institution INUDI
reponame_str Revista Innova Educación
collection Revista Innova Educación
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1844079258132021248
spelling Constructivism in the pedagogical and epistemological conceptions of teachersEl constructivismo en las concepciones pedagógicas y epistemológicas de los profesoresVargas, KeniaAcuña, JohnConstructivismoConcepciones docentesrevisión sistemáticaConstructivismteaching conceptionssystematic reviewIn recent years, pedagogical constructivism has enjoyed great popularity, so that many people recognize themselves as constructivists. In the literature it was found that many teachers reported having conceptions aligned to this paradigm, however, the results are contradictory in this regard. In this sense, the purpose of this work was to deepen the results of such research on teaching conceptions, specifically tracing a constructivist view of their practice, as well as the recommendations that the experts have made with regard to these results. A systematic review of the literature was carried out. Documents were searched in the Dialnet database. After applying different filters and assessing the relevance of the articles, 13 works were admitted for qualitative and quantitative analysis. Among the main results, it is emphasized that teachers maintain epistemological and pedagogical conceptions formed by different paradigms, which are not always coherent with each other, but present diffuse limits. For this reason, interventions are recommended that: 1) review paradigmatic differences at the theoretical level, 2) allow teachers to reflect on their conceptions and help them to externalize them, and 3) implement practical models in accordance with institutionally desirable scientific or pedagogical paradigms. It presents theoretical material organized with respect to constructivism to guide the first two phases.En los últimos años, el constructivismo pedagógico ha gozado de gran popularidad, de tal forma que muchas personas se reconocen como constructivistas. En la literatura se encontró que muchos docentes señalaron tener concepciones alineadas a este paradigma, sin embargo, los resultados son contradictorios al respecto. En este sentido, el propósito de este trabajo fue profundizar en los resultados de tales investigaciones sobre las concepciones docentes, rastreando específicamente una visión constructivista de su práctica, así como las recomendaciones que los expertos han realizado con relación a estos resultados. Para ello, se llevó a cabo una revisión sistemática de la literatura. La búsqueda de documentos se realizó en la base de datos Dialnet. Luego de aplicar diferentes filtros y de valorar la pertinencia de los artículos, se admitieron 13 trabajos para el análisis cualitativo y cuantitativo. Entre los resultados principales se destaca que los profesores mantienen concepciones epistemológicas y pedagógicas conformadas por distintos paradigmas, que no siempre son coherentes entre sí, sino que presentan limites difusos. Por tal motivo, se recomiendan efectuar intervenciones que: 1) revisen las diferencias paradigmáticas a nivel teórico, 2) permitan reflexionar a los profesores sobre sus concepciones y le ayuden a externarlas y 3) se implementen modelos prácticos acordes con los paradigmas científicos o pedagógicos institucionalmente deseables. Se presenta material teórico organizado respecto al constructivismo para orientar las dos primeras fases.Instituto Universitario de Innovación Ciencia y Tecnología Inudi Perú2020-10-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfaudio/mpegaudio/mpeghttps://revistainnovaeducacion.com/index.php/rie/article/view/11910.35622/j.rie.2020.04.004Revista Innova Educación; Vol. 2 Núm. 4 (2020); 555-5752664-14962664-1488reponame:Revista Innova Educacióninstname:Instituto Universitario de Innovación Ciencia y Tecnología Inudi Perúinstacron:INUDIspaenghttps://revistainnovaeducacion.com/index.php/rie/article/view/119/184https://revistainnovaeducacion.com/index.php/rie/article/view/119/186https://revistainnovaeducacion.com/index.php/rie/article/view/119/501https://revistainnovaeducacion.com/index.php/rie/article/view/119/502Derechos de autor 2020 Kenia Vargas, John Acuñahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs2.revistainnovaeducacion.com:article/1192024-10-05T13:56:45Z
score 13.062494
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).