The property formalization procedure and binding precedents of the COFOPRI Administrative Property Court
Descripción del Articulo
Faced with the challenge posed by widespread informality in housing and as part of a public policy aimed at the mass formalization of property ownership, the Commission for the Formalization of Property – COFOPRI – was created in 1996 through Legislative Decree No. 803. This entity was established a...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2026 |
| Institución: | Universidad de San Martín de Porres |
| Repositorio: | Revista Gobierno y Gestión Pública |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.usmp.edu.pe:article/3428 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/RevistaGobiernoyG/article/view/3428 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | housing informality general administrative procedure special formalization procedure Property Administrative Tribunal mandatory observance precedent informalidad de la vivienda procedimiento administrativo Tribunal administrativo de la propiedad precedente de observancia abierta |
| id |
REVGGP_a0163b39b45eddbe23df19543135210e |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usmp.edu.pe:article/3428 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVGGP |
| network_name_str |
Revista Gobierno y Gestión Pública |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The property formalization procedure and binding precedents of the COFOPRI Administrative Property Court El procedimiento de formalización de propiedades y los precedentes de observancia obligatoria del Tribunal administrativo de la propiedad de COFOPRI |
| title |
The property formalization procedure and binding precedents of the COFOPRI Administrative Property Court |
| spellingShingle |
The property formalization procedure and binding precedents of the COFOPRI Administrative Property Court Rojas García, Demetrio housing informality general administrative procedure special formalization procedure Property Administrative Tribunal mandatory observance precedent informalidad de la vivienda procedimiento administrativo Tribunal administrativo de la propiedad precedente de observancia abierta |
| title_short |
The property formalization procedure and binding precedents of the COFOPRI Administrative Property Court |
| title_full |
The property formalization procedure and binding precedents of the COFOPRI Administrative Property Court |
| title_fullStr |
The property formalization procedure and binding precedents of the COFOPRI Administrative Property Court |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The property formalization procedure and binding precedents of the COFOPRI Administrative Property Court |
| title_sort |
The property formalization procedure and binding precedents of the COFOPRI Administrative Property Court |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Rojas García, Demetrio |
| author |
Rojas García, Demetrio |
| author_facet |
Rojas García, Demetrio |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
housing informality general administrative procedure special formalization procedure Property Administrative Tribunal mandatory observance precedent informalidad de la vivienda procedimiento administrativo Tribunal administrativo de la propiedad precedente de observancia abierta |
| topic |
housing informality general administrative procedure special formalization procedure Property Administrative Tribunal mandatory observance precedent informalidad de la vivienda procedimiento administrativo Tribunal administrativo de la propiedad precedente de observancia abierta |
| description |
Faced with the challenge posed by widespread informality in housing and as part of a public policy aimed at the mass formalization of property ownership, the Commission for the Formalization of Property – COFOPRI – was created in 1996 through Legislative Decree No. 803. This entity was established as a decentralized, autonomous public body specializing in the formalization of informal property ownership, within a context of structural reforms to the public sector that promoted the creation of autonomous agencies with a new administrative function: a quasi-jurisdictional function, with the power to resolve disputes administratively. Over nearly three decades, the regulatory framework designed for the formalization policy has undergone numerous modifications; however, the legal framework still contains deficiencies and gaps. Specifically in the procedural sphere, formalization procedures have been affected and impacted by various regulations, notably Law No. 27444, the General Administrative Procedure Law, and its amendments. In this context of regulatory gaps and due to the inherent dynamics of the administrative tribunals' decision-making function, it is essential to resort to legal integration tools. Among these tools, the binding precedents issued by the Administrative Property Tribunal (TAP) of COFOPRI are fundamental to ensuring the coherence and predictability of the process. Indeed, the TAP plays a fundamental role in the property formalization process in Peru, as it resolves appeals filed against resolutions issued by the Zonal Offices. It is empowered to establish binding precedents that guide the interpretation and application of the regulations related to property formalization procedures. Thus, although it has produced few precedents since its inception, it has published the majority of them in the last three years, thereby offering the possibility of actively filling regulatory gaps and achieving greater efficiency and predictability in property formalization procedures. |
| publishDate |
2026 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2026-03-23 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/RevistaGobiernoyG/article/view/3428 10.24265/iggp.2026.v13n1.03 |
| url |
https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/RevistaGobiernoyG/article/view/3428 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.24265/iggp.2026.v13n1.03 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/RevistaGobiernoyG/article/view/3428/4133 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2026 Demetrio Rojas García https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2026 Demetrio Rojas García https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Gobierno y de Gestión Pública |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Gobierno y de Gestión Pública |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Gobierno y Gestión Pública; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2026): Revista Gobierno y Gestión Pública; 14 - 29 2414-4991 reponame:Revista Gobierno y Gestión Pública instname:Universidad de San Martín de Porres instacron:USMP |
| instname_str |
Universidad de San Martín de Porres |
| instacron_str |
USMP |
| institution |
USMP |
| reponame_str |
Revista Gobierno y Gestión Pública |
| collection |
Revista Gobierno y Gestión Pública |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1868359245247807488 |
| spelling |
The property formalization procedure and binding precedents of the COFOPRI Administrative Property CourtEl procedimiento de formalización de propiedades y los precedentes de observancia obligatoria del Tribunal administrativo de la propiedad de COFOPRIRojas García, Demetriohousing informalitygeneral administrative procedurespecial formalization procedureProperty Administrative Tribunalmandatory observance precedentinformalidad de la viviendaprocedimiento administrativoTribunal administrativo de la propiedadprecedente de observancia abiertaFaced with the challenge posed by widespread informality in housing and as part of a public policy aimed at the mass formalization of property ownership, the Commission for the Formalization of Property – COFOPRI – was created in 1996 through Legislative Decree No. 803. This entity was established as a decentralized, autonomous public body specializing in the formalization of informal property ownership, within a context of structural reforms to the public sector that promoted the creation of autonomous agencies with a new administrative function: a quasi-jurisdictional function, with the power to resolve disputes administratively. Over nearly three decades, the regulatory framework designed for the formalization policy has undergone numerous modifications; however, the legal framework still contains deficiencies and gaps. Specifically in the procedural sphere, formalization procedures have been affected and impacted by various regulations, notably Law No. 27444, the General Administrative Procedure Law, and its amendments. In this context of regulatory gaps and due to the inherent dynamics of the administrative tribunals' decision-making function, it is essential to resort to legal integration tools. Among these tools, the binding precedents issued by the Administrative Property Tribunal (TAP) of COFOPRI are fundamental to ensuring the coherence and predictability of the process. Indeed, the TAP plays a fundamental role in the property formalization process in Peru, as it resolves appeals filed against resolutions issued by the Zonal Offices. It is empowered to establish binding precedents that guide the interpretation and application of the regulations related to property formalization procedures. Thus, although it has produced few precedents since its inception, it has published the majority of them in the last three years, thereby offering the possibility of actively filling regulatory gaps and achieving greater efficiency and predictability in property formalization procedures.Frente al desafío que representa la marcada informalidad de la vivienda y como parte de una política pública orientada a la formalización masiva de la propiedad, en 1996 se crea la Comisión de Formalización de la Propiedad – COFOPRI, mediante el Decreto Legislativo Nº 803. Esta entidad nace como un organismo público descentralizado, autónomo y especializado en la formalización de la propiedad informal, en un contexto de reformas estructurales de la función pública que promovieron la creación de organismos autónomos con una nueva función administrativa: la función cuasi jurisdiccional, con facultades para resolver controversias en sede administrativa. A lo largo de casi tres décadas, el marco normativo diseñado para la política de formalización ha sufrido numerosas modificaciones y, no obstante, el cuerpo legal mantiene deficiencias y vacíos. Específicamente en el ámbito procesal, los procedimientos de formalización se han visto afectados e impactados por diversas normativas, destacando la Ley N° 27444, Ley del Procedimiento Administrativo General, y sus modificatorias. En este contexto de vacíos normativos y debido a la dinámica inherente a la función resolutiva de los tribunales administrativos, resulta indispensable recurrir a herramientas de integración jurídica. Entre estas herramientas, los precedentes de observancia obligatoria emitidos por el Tribunal Administrativo de la Propiedad (TAP) de COFOPRI son fundamentales para asegurar la coherencia y predictibilidad del proceso. En efecto, el TAP cumple un papel fundamental en el proceso de formalización de la propiedad en el Perú, pues resuelve los recursos de apelación interpuestos contra las resoluciones emitidas por las Oficinas Zonales, estando facultado para establecer precedentes de observancia obligatoria que orientan la interpretación y aplicación de las normas vinculadas con los procedimientos de formalización de la propiedad. De este modo, si bien desde su existencia ha tenido una escasa producción de precedentes, en los últimos tres años ha publicado la mayor parte de precedentes, y con ello se vislumbra la posibilidad de integrar activamente los vacíos normativos y lograr una mayor eficacia y predictibilidad de los procedimientos de formalización de la propiedad predial.Instituto de Gobierno y de Gestión Pública2026-03-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtículo revisado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/RevistaGobiernoyG/article/view/342810.24265/iggp.2026.v13n1.03Gobierno y Gestión Pública; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2026): Revista Gobierno y Gestión Pública; 14 - 292414-4991reponame:Revista Gobierno y Gestión Públicainstname:Universidad de San Martín de Porresinstacron:USMPspahttps://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/RevistaGobiernoyG/article/view/3428/4133Derechos de autor 2026 Demetrio Rojas Garcíahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.usmp.edu.pe:article/34282026-03-23T16:55:43Z |
| score |
13.072473 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).