The property formalization procedure and binding precedents of the COFOPRI Administrative Property Court

Descripción del Articulo

Faced with the challenge posed by widespread informality in housing and as part of a public policy aimed at the mass formalization of property ownership, the Commission for the Formalization of Property – COFOPRI – was created in 1996 through Legislative Decree No. 803. This entity was established a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Rojas García, Demetrio
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2026
Institución:Universidad de San Martín de Porres
Repositorio:Revista Gobierno y Gestión Pública
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.usmp.edu.pe:article/3428
Enlace del recurso:https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/RevistaGobiernoyG/article/view/3428
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:housing informality
general administrative procedure
special formalization procedure
Property Administrative Tribunal
mandatory observance precedent
informalidad de la vivienda
procedimiento administrativo
Tribunal administrativo de la propiedad
precedente de observancia abierta
id REVGGP_a0163b39b45eddbe23df19543135210e
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usmp.edu.pe:article/3428
network_acronym_str REVGGP
network_name_str Revista Gobierno y Gestión Pública
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The property formalization procedure and binding precedents of the COFOPRI Administrative Property Court
El procedimiento de formalización de propiedades y los precedentes de observancia obligatoria del Tribunal administrativo de la propiedad de COFOPRI
title The property formalization procedure and binding precedents of the COFOPRI Administrative Property Court
spellingShingle The property formalization procedure and binding precedents of the COFOPRI Administrative Property Court
Rojas García, Demetrio
housing informality
general administrative procedure
special formalization procedure
Property Administrative Tribunal
mandatory observance precedent
informalidad de la vivienda
procedimiento administrativo
Tribunal administrativo de la propiedad
precedente de observancia abierta
title_short The property formalization procedure and binding precedents of the COFOPRI Administrative Property Court
title_full The property formalization procedure and binding precedents of the COFOPRI Administrative Property Court
title_fullStr The property formalization procedure and binding precedents of the COFOPRI Administrative Property Court
title_full_unstemmed The property formalization procedure and binding precedents of the COFOPRI Administrative Property Court
title_sort The property formalization procedure and binding precedents of the COFOPRI Administrative Property Court
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rojas García, Demetrio
author Rojas García, Demetrio
author_facet Rojas García, Demetrio
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv housing informality
general administrative procedure
special formalization procedure
Property Administrative Tribunal
mandatory observance precedent
informalidad de la vivienda
procedimiento administrativo
Tribunal administrativo de la propiedad
precedente de observancia abierta
topic housing informality
general administrative procedure
special formalization procedure
Property Administrative Tribunal
mandatory observance precedent
informalidad de la vivienda
procedimiento administrativo
Tribunal administrativo de la propiedad
precedente de observancia abierta
description Faced with the challenge posed by widespread informality in housing and as part of a public policy aimed at the mass formalization of property ownership, the Commission for the Formalization of Property – COFOPRI – was created in 1996 through Legislative Decree No. 803. This entity was established as a decentralized, autonomous public body specializing in the formalization of informal property ownership, within a context of structural reforms to the public sector that promoted the creation of autonomous agencies with a new administrative function: a quasi-jurisdictional function, with the power to resolve disputes administratively. Over nearly three decades, the regulatory framework designed for the formalization policy has undergone numerous modifications; however, the legal framework still contains deficiencies and gaps. Specifically in the procedural sphere, formalization procedures have been affected and impacted by various regulations, notably Law No. 27444, the General Administrative Procedure Law, and its amendments. In this context of regulatory gaps and due to the inherent dynamics of the administrative tribunals' decision-making function, it is essential to resort to legal integration tools. Among these tools, the binding precedents issued by the Administrative Property Tribunal (TAP) of COFOPRI are fundamental to ensuring the coherence and predictability of the process. Indeed, the TAP plays a fundamental role in the property formalization process in Peru, as it resolves appeals filed against resolutions issued by the Zonal Offices. It is empowered to establish binding precedents that guide the interpretation and application of the regulations related to property formalization procedures. Thus, although it has produced few precedents since its inception, it has published the majority of them in the last three years, thereby offering the possibility of actively filling regulatory gaps and achieving greater efficiency and predictability in property formalization procedures.
publishDate 2026
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2026-03-23
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artículo revisado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/RevistaGobiernoyG/article/view/3428
10.24265/iggp.2026.v13n1.03
url https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/RevistaGobiernoyG/article/view/3428
identifier_str_mv 10.24265/iggp.2026.v13n1.03
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/RevistaGobiernoyG/article/view/3428/4133
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2026 Demetrio Rojas García
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2026 Demetrio Rojas García
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Gobierno y de Gestión Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Gobierno y de Gestión Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Gobierno y Gestión Pública; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2026): Revista Gobierno y Gestión Pública; 14 - 29
2414-4991
reponame:Revista Gobierno y Gestión Pública
instname:Universidad de San Martín de Porres
instacron:USMP
instname_str Universidad de San Martín de Porres
instacron_str USMP
institution USMP
reponame_str Revista Gobierno y Gestión Pública
collection Revista Gobierno y Gestión Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1868359245247807488
spelling The property formalization procedure and binding precedents of the COFOPRI Administrative Property CourtEl procedimiento de formalización de propiedades y los precedentes de observancia obligatoria del Tribunal administrativo de la propiedad de COFOPRIRojas García, Demetriohousing informalitygeneral administrative procedurespecial formalization procedureProperty Administrative Tribunalmandatory observance precedentinformalidad de la viviendaprocedimiento administrativoTribunal administrativo de la propiedadprecedente de observancia abiertaFaced with the challenge posed by widespread informality in housing and as part of a public policy aimed at the mass formalization of property ownership, the Commission for the Formalization of Property – COFOPRI – was created in 1996 through Legislative Decree No. 803. This entity was established as a decentralized, autonomous public body specializing in the formalization of informal property ownership, within a context of structural reforms to the public sector that promoted the creation of autonomous agencies with a new administrative function: a quasi-jurisdictional function, with the power to resolve disputes administratively. Over nearly three decades, the regulatory framework designed for the formalization policy has undergone numerous modifications; however, the legal framework still contains deficiencies and gaps. Specifically in the procedural sphere, formalization procedures have been affected and impacted by various regulations, notably Law No. 27444, the General Administrative Procedure Law, and its amendments. In this context of regulatory gaps and due to the inherent dynamics of the administrative tribunals' decision-making function, it is essential to resort to legal integration tools. Among these tools, the binding precedents issued by the Administrative Property Tribunal (TAP) of COFOPRI are fundamental to ensuring the coherence and predictability of the process. Indeed, the TAP plays a fundamental role in the property formalization process in Peru, as it resolves appeals filed against resolutions issued by the Zonal Offices. It is empowered to establish binding precedents that guide the interpretation and application of the regulations related to property formalization procedures. Thus, although it has produced few precedents since its inception, it has published the majority of them in the last three years, thereby offering the possibility of actively filling regulatory gaps and achieving greater efficiency and predictability in property formalization procedures.Frente al desafío que representa la marcada informalidad de la vivienda y como parte de una política pública orientada a la formalización masiva de la propiedad, en 1996 se crea la Comisión de Formalización de la Propiedad – COFOPRI, mediante el Decreto Legislativo Nº 803. Esta entidad nace como un organismo público descentralizado, autónomo y especializado en la formalización de la propiedad informal, en un contexto de reformas estructurales de la función pública que promovieron la creación de organismos autónomos con una nueva función administrativa: la función cuasi jurisdiccional, con facultades para resolver controversias en sede administrativa. A lo largo de casi tres décadas, el marco normativo diseñado para la política de formalización ha sufrido numerosas modificaciones y, no obstante, el cuerpo legal mantiene deficiencias y vacíos. Específicamente en el ámbito procesal, los procedimientos de formalización se han visto afectados e impactados por diversas normativas, destacando la Ley N° 27444, Ley del Procedimiento Administrativo General, y sus modificatorias. En este contexto de vacíos normativos y debido a la dinámica inherente a la función resolutiva de los tribunales administrativos, resulta indispensable recurrir a herramientas de integración jurídica. Entre estas herramientas, los precedentes de observancia obligatoria emitidos por el Tribunal Administrativo de la Propiedad (TAP) de COFOPRI son fundamentales para asegurar la coherencia y predictibilidad del proceso. En efecto, el TAP cumple un papel fundamental en el proceso de formalización de la propiedad en el Perú, pues resuelve los recursos de apelación interpuestos contra las resoluciones emitidas por las Oficinas Zonales, estando facultado para establecer precedentes de observancia obligatoria que orientan la interpretación y aplicación de las normas vinculadas con los procedimientos de formalización de la propiedad. De este modo, si bien desde su existencia ha tenido una escasa producción de precedentes, en los últimos tres años ha publicado la mayor parte de precedentes, y con ello se vislumbra la posibilidad de integrar activamente los vacíos normativos y lograr una mayor eficacia y predictibilidad de los procedimientos de formalización de la propiedad predial.Instituto de Gobierno y de Gestión Pública2026-03-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtículo revisado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/RevistaGobiernoyG/article/view/342810.24265/iggp.2026.v13n1.03Gobierno y Gestión Pública; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2026): Revista Gobierno y Gestión Pública; 14 - 292414-4991reponame:Revista Gobierno y Gestión Públicainstname:Universidad de San Martín de Porresinstacron:USMPspahttps://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/RevistaGobiernoyG/article/view/3428/4133Derechos de autor 2026 Demetrio Rojas Garcíahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.usmp.edu.pe:article/34282026-03-23T16:55:43Z
score 13.072473
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).