Institutionalist versus distortionist views of labor market reforms: An investigation into the post-liberalized manufacturing sector in India

Descripción del Articulo

Labor regulation and employment relation has been investigated in India in light of the seminal work of Besley and Burgess (2004), considering formal sector manufacturing employment as the explained variable. Empirical findings support, although not very strongly, the institutionalist view, i.e., pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Kumar Bhandari, Anup, Sudarsan, Arun
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2016
Institución:Universidad ESAN
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad ESAN
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/139
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/139
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Labor regulation
Formal sector
Manufacturing employment
Liberalization
id REVESAN_932eb114e77b45387b73e4f088ad026e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/139
network_acronym_str REVESAN
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad ESAN
repository_id_str .
spelling Institutionalist versus distortionist views of labor market reforms: An investigation into the post-liberalized manufacturing sector in IndiaKumar Bhandari, Anup Sudarsan, Arun Labor regulationFormal sectorManufacturing employmentLiberalizationLabor regulation and employment relation has been investigated in India in light of the seminal work of Besley and Burgess (2004), considering formal sector manufacturing employment as the explained variable. Empirical findings support, although not very strongly, the institutionalist view, i.e., pro-worker amendment in labour laws induces employment. Among the other factors, real wage rate has significant negative effect on employment, whereas that for real per capita developmental capital expenditure, per capita electricity generation capacity and real per capita net state domestic productis significant positive. However, effect of per capita real developmental revenue expenditure is inconclusive. In other words, although itimproves employability of workers through their human capital improvement, which is probablymetupatthe cost of worsening overallinfrastructuraldevelopment,throughreducing corresponding capital expenditure! Supporting evidence has also been provided favoring this conjecture. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jefas.2016.06.​002Universidad ESAN2016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/139Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science; Vol. 21 No. 41 (2016): July - December; 63-72Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science; Vol. 21 Núm. 41 (2016): July - December; 63-722218-06482077-1886reponame:Revistas - Universidad ESANinstname:Universidad ESANinstacron:ESANenghttps://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/139/109Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciencehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1392021-08-17T23:25:53Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Institutionalist versus distortionist views of labor market reforms: An investigation into the post-liberalized manufacturing sector in India
title Institutionalist versus distortionist views of labor market reforms: An investigation into the post-liberalized manufacturing sector in India
spellingShingle Institutionalist versus distortionist views of labor market reforms: An investigation into the post-liberalized manufacturing sector in India
Kumar Bhandari, Anup
Labor regulation
Formal sector
Manufacturing employment
Liberalization
title_short Institutionalist versus distortionist views of labor market reforms: An investigation into the post-liberalized manufacturing sector in India
title_full Institutionalist versus distortionist views of labor market reforms: An investigation into the post-liberalized manufacturing sector in India
title_fullStr Institutionalist versus distortionist views of labor market reforms: An investigation into the post-liberalized manufacturing sector in India
title_full_unstemmed Institutionalist versus distortionist views of labor market reforms: An investigation into the post-liberalized manufacturing sector in India
title_sort Institutionalist versus distortionist views of labor market reforms: An investigation into the post-liberalized manufacturing sector in India
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Kumar Bhandari, Anup
Sudarsan, Arun
author Kumar Bhandari, Anup
author_facet Kumar Bhandari, Anup
Sudarsan, Arun
author_role author
author2 Sudarsan, Arun
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Labor regulation
Formal sector
Manufacturing employment
Liberalization
topic Labor regulation
Formal sector
Manufacturing employment
Liberalization
description Labor regulation and employment relation has been investigated in India in light of the seminal work of Besley and Burgess (2004), considering formal sector manufacturing employment as the explained variable. Empirical findings support, although not very strongly, the institutionalist view, i.e., pro-worker amendment in labour laws induces employment. Among the other factors, real wage rate has significant negative effect on employment, whereas that for real per capita developmental capital expenditure, per capita electricity generation capacity and real per capita net state domestic productis significant positive. However, effect of per capita real developmental revenue expenditure is inconclusive. In other words, although itimproves employability of workers through their human capital improvement, which is probablymetupatthe cost of worsening overallinfrastructuraldevelopment,throughreducing corresponding capital expenditure! Supporting evidence has also been provided favoring this conjecture. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jefas.2016.06.​002
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/139
url https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/139
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/139/109
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad ESAN
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad ESAN
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science; Vol. 21 No. 41 (2016): July - December; 63-72
Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science; Vol. 21 Núm. 41 (2016): July - December; 63-72
2218-0648
2077-1886
reponame:Revistas - Universidad ESAN
instname:Universidad ESAN
instacron:ESAN
instname_str Universidad ESAN
instacron_str ESAN
institution ESAN
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad ESAN
collection Revistas - Universidad ESAN
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1846878341010817024
score 12.605999
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).