IFRS adoption and firms’ opacity around the world: what factors affect this relationship?

Descripción del Articulo

Purpose. This paper aims to identify what are the moderating factors affecting the relationship between firms’ adoption of international financial and reporting standards (IFRS) and the firm’s opacity. Design/methodology/approach. This study uses the meta-analysis methodology from Hunter et al. (198...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Mongrut, Samuel, Tello Marín, Manuel, Torres Postigo, Maria del Carmen, Fuenzalida O’Shee, Darcy
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2021
Institución:Universidad ESAN
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad ESAN
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/112
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/112
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Earnings management
Opacity
IFRS
id REVESAN_551932f3e996e2fa28dcdb28487133f8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/112
network_acronym_str REVESAN
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad ESAN
repository_id_str .
spelling IFRS adoption and firms’ opacity around the world: what factors affect this relationship?Mongrut, SamuelTello Marín, Manuel Torres Postigo, Maria del CarmenFuenzalida O’Shee, DarcyEarnings managementOpacityIFRSPurpose. This paper aims to identify what are the moderating factors affecting the relationship between firms’ adoption of international financial and reporting standards (IFRS) and the firm’s opacity. Design/methodology/approach. This study uses the meta-analysis methodology from Hunter et al. (1982) to find if the mere IFRS adoption reduces firm’s opacity and a meta-regression from Stanley and Jarrell (1989) to identify the moderating factors that may influence this relationship. Findings. Contrary to previous studies, this study finds a low, negative and nonsignificant correlation between IFRS adoption and firms’ opacity, but this relationship depends on the geographical region. Using 34 results from 28 studies from different continents published between 2005 and 2018 this study finds that IFRS adoption reduces opacity in countries with common law (COML) and with more authorities’ oversight and power to enforce the rules. Originality/value. This study finds two institutional commonalities between different previous studies that intend to assess the impact of the IFRS adoption upon firms’ opacity: the legal system and the authorities’ oversight power. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-02-2020-0060Universidad ESAN2021-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/112Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science; Vol. 26 No. 51 (2021): January - June; 7-21Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science; Vol. 26 Núm. 51 (2021): January - June; 7-212218-06482077-1886reponame:Revistas - Universidad ESANinstname:Universidad ESANinstacron:ESANenghttps://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/112/121Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciencehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1122021-11-17T03:01:11Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv IFRS adoption and firms’ opacity around the world: what factors affect this relationship?
title IFRS adoption and firms’ opacity around the world: what factors affect this relationship?
spellingShingle IFRS adoption and firms’ opacity around the world: what factors affect this relationship?
Mongrut, Samuel
Earnings management
Opacity
IFRS
title_short IFRS adoption and firms’ opacity around the world: what factors affect this relationship?
title_full IFRS adoption and firms’ opacity around the world: what factors affect this relationship?
title_fullStr IFRS adoption and firms’ opacity around the world: what factors affect this relationship?
title_full_unstemmed IFRS adoption and firms’ opacity around the world: what factors affect this relationship?
title_sort IFRS adoption and firms’ opacity around the world: what factors affect this relationship?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Mongrut, Samuel
Tello Marín, Manuel
Torres Postigo, Maria del Carmen
Fuenzalida O’Shee, Darcy
author Mongrut, Samuel
author_facet Mongrut, Samuel
Tello Marín, Manuel
Torres Postigo, Maria del Carmen
Fuenzalida O’Shee, Darcy
author_role author
author2 Tello Marín, Manuel
Torres Postigo, Maria del Carmen
Fuenzalida O’Shee, Darcy
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Earnings management
Opacity
IFRS
topic Earnings management
Opacity
IFRS
description Purpose. This paper aims to identify what are the moderating factors affecting the relationship between firms’ adoption of international financial and reporting standards (IFRS) and the firm’s opacity. Design/methodology/approach. This study uses the meta-analysis methodology from Hunter et al. (1982) to find if the mere IFRS adoption reduces firm’s opacity and a meta-regression from Stanley and Jarrell (1989) to identify the moderating factors that may influence this relationship. Findings. Contrary to previous studies, this study finds a low, negative and nonsignificant correlation between IFRS adoption and firms’ opacity, but this relationship depends on the geographical region. Using 34 results from 28 studies from different continents published between 2005 and 2018 this study finds that IFRS adoption reduces opacity in countries with common law (COML) and with more authorities’ oversight and power to enforce the rules. Originality/value. This study finds two institutional commonalities between different previous studies that intend to assess the impact of the IFRS adoption upon firms’ opacity: the legal system and the authorities’ oversight power. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-02-2020-0060
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/112
url https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/112
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/112/121
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad ESAN
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad ESAN
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science; Vol. 26 No. 51 (2021): January - June; 7-21
Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science; Vol. 26 Núm. 51 (2021): January - June; 7-21
2218-0648
2077-1886
reponame:Revistas - Universidad ESAN
instname:Universidad ESAN
instacron:ESAN
instname_str Universidad ESAN
instacron_str ESAN
institution ESAN
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad ESAN
collection Revistas - Universidad ESAN
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1844975898736984064
score 12.9067135
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).