Capital structure management differences in Latin American and US firms after 2008 crisis

Descripción del Articulo

Purpose. This paper aims to analyse the capital structure determining factors of Latin American and US corporations after the crisis of 2008, as a means of comparing theoretical assumptions and empirical results in markets of different efficiency levels. Design/methodology/approach. The study sample...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Valcacer Rodrigues, Santiago, José de Moura, Heber, Lopes Santos, David Ferreira, Amorim Sobreiro, Vinicius
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2017
Institución:Universidad ESAN
Repositorio:Revistas - Universidad ESAN
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/131
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/131
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Information asymmetry
Trade-off
Indebtedness
Pecking order
Pooled regression
id REVESAN_09b535c61e7469a03c1a52deddf52212
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/131
network_acronym_str REVESAN
network_name_str Revistas - Universidad ESAN
repository_id_str .
spelling Capital structure management differences in Latin American and US firms after 2008 crisisValcacer Rodrigues, Santiago José de Moura, Heber Lopes Santos, David Ferreira Amorim Sobreiro, Vinicius Information asymmetryTrade-offIndebtednessPecking orderPooled regressionPurpose. This paper aims to analyse the capital structure determining factors of Latin American and US corporations after the crisis of 2008, as a means of comparing theoretical assumptions and empirical results in markets of different efficiency levels. Design/methodology/approach. The study sample comprises 1,091 companies belonging to the six largest economies in Latin America plus the USA, in the years 2009 to 2013. The authors performed a regression with data from a balanced overview, which were obtained by using the criterion of minimum weighted square. Findings. The results demonstrated differences in determining factors of capital structure between companies from Latin America and from the USA. The pecking order theory was mostly observed in Latin American companies and the trade-off theory greater was closely aligned with US firms. Originality/value. This research brings new contributions to the issue, once the differences and determinative of the debt profile in companies from different economic contexts are compared. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-01-2017-0008Universidad ESAN2017-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/131Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science; Vol. 22 No. 42 (2017): January - June; 51-74Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science; Vol. 22 Núm. 42 (2017): January - June; 51-742218-06482077-1886reponame:Revistas - Universidad ESANinstname:Universidad ESANinstacron:ESANenghttps://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/131/103Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciencehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1312021-06-20T00:02:13Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Capital structure management differences in Latin American and US firms after 2008 crisis
title Capital structure management differences in Latin American and US firms after 2008 crisis
spellingShingle Capital structure management differences in Latin American and US firms after 2008 crisis
Valcacer Rodrigues, Santiago
Information asymmetry
Trade-off
Indebtedness
Pecking order
Pooled regression
title_short Capital structure management differences in Latin American and US firms after 2008 crisis
title_full Capital structure management differences in Latin American and US firms after 2008 crisis
title_fullStr Capital structure management differences in Latin American and US firms after 2008 crisis
title_full_unstemmed Capital structure management differences in Latin American and US firms after 2008 crisis
title_sort Capital structure management differences in Latin American and US firms after 2008 crisis
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Valcacer Rodrigues, Santiago
José de Moura, Heber
Lopes Santos, David Ferreira
Amorim Sobreiro, Vinicius
author Valcacer Rodrigues, Santiago
author_facet Valcacer Rodrigues, Santiago
José de Moura, Heber
Lopes Santos, David Ferreira
Amorim Sobreiro, Vinicius
author_role author
author2 José de Moura, Heber
Lopes Santos, David Ferreira
Amorim Sobreiro, Vinicius
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Information asymmetry
Trade-off
Indebtedness
Pecking order
Pooled regression
topic Information asymmetry
Trade-off
Indebtedness
Pecking order
Pooled regression
description Purpose. This paper aims to analyse the capital structure determining factors of Latin American and US corporations after the crisis of 2008, as a means of comparing theoretical assumptions and empirical results in markets of different efficiency levels. Design/methodology/approach. The study sample comprises 1,091 companies belonging to the six largest economies in Latin America plus the USA, in the years 2009 to 2013. The authors performed a regression with data from a balanced overview, which were obtained by using the criterion of minimum weighted square. Findings. The results demonstrated differences in determining factors of capital structure between companies from Latin America and from the USA. The pecking order theory was mostly observed in Latin American companies and the trade-off theory greater was closely aligned with US firms. Originality/value. This research brings new contributions to the issue, once the differences and determinative of the debt profile in companies from different economic contexts are compared. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-01-2017-0008
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/131
url https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/131
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/131/103
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad ESAN
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad ESAN
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science; Vol. 22 No. 42 (2017): January - June; 51-74
Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science; Vol. 22 Núm. 42 (2017): January - June; 51-74
2218-0648
2077-1886
reponame:Revistas - Universidad ESAN
instname:Universidad ESAN
instacron:ESAN
instname_str Universidad ESAN
instacron_str ESAN
institution ESAN
reponame_str Revistas - Universidad ESAN
collection Revistas - Universidad ESAN
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1844975898790461440
score 12.9067135
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).