From Democratic Erosion to Autocratization: Patterns and Trends in the Twenty-First Century

Descripción del Articulo

Democratic erosion emerges as a complex global phenomenon that demands a critical analysis of its relationship with the rise of autocratic regimes. This article investigates how this democratic decline fosters autocratization, questioning whether immune democracies exist and how institutions can mai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Camilo Junior, Valter Geronimo
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2025
Institución:Universidad de Piura
Repositorio:Revista de Derecho
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.udep.edu.pe:article/4391
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/4391
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Erosión democrática
autocratización
resiliencia institucional
polarización política
Democratic erosión
autocratization
institutional resilience
political polarization
id REVDE_ca34d4d4c13aa8fd96dff76aa320fb94
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.udep.edu.pe:article/4391
network_acronym_str REVDE
network_name_str Revista de Derecho
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv From Democratic Erosion to Autocratization: Patterns and Trends in the Twenty-First Century
De la erosión democrática a la autocratización: Patrones y tendencias en el siglo XXI
title From Democratic Erosion to Autocratization: Patterns and Trends in the Twenty-First Century
spellingShingle From Democratic Erosion to Autocratization: Patterns and Trends in the Twenty-First Century
Camilo Junior, Valter Geronimo
Erosión democrática
autocratización
resiliencia institucional
polarización política
Democratic erosión
autocratization
institutional resilience
political polarization
title_short From Democratic Erosion to Autocratization: Patterns and Trends in the Twenty-First Century
title_full From Democratic Erosion to Autocratization: Patterns and Trends in the Twenty-First Century
title_fullStr From Democratic Erosion to Autocratization: Patterns and Trends in the Twenty-First Century
title_full_unstemmed From Democratic Erosion to Autocratization: Patterns and Trends in the Twenty-First Century
title_sort From Democratic Erosion to Autocratization: Patterns and Trends in the Twenty-First Century
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Camilo Junior, Valter Geronimo
author Camilo Junior, Valter Geronimo
author_facet Camilo Junior, Valter Geronimo
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Erosión democrática
autocratización
resiliencia institucional
polarización política
Democratic erosión
autocratization
institutional resilience
political polarization
topic Erosión democrática
autocratización
resiliencia institucional
polarización política
Democratic erosión
autocratization
institutional resilience
political polarization
description Democratic erosion emerges as a complex global phenomenon that demands a critical analysis of its relationship with the rise of autocratic regimes. This article investigates how this democratic decline fosters autocratization, questioning whether immune democracies exist and how institutions can maintain their resilience in the face of crises. Through a qualitative literature review, contemporary patterns are analyzed, such as the backsliding in Hungary and polarization in the United States, which reveal structural vulnerabilities: institutional weakness, socioeconomic inequalities, and the instrumentalization of the political system. The study is organized into four axes: (1) the scope of erosion, demonstrating that even consolidated democracies are not exempt; (2) its historical and economic roots; (3) the turning point at which erosion becomes a deliberate autocratic project, analyzing the “qualitative leap” that transforms institutional decay into a strategy of power capture; and (4) resistance strategies, where an “architecture of democratic resilience” based on proactive civic vigilance is proposed. It is concluded that erosion arises from interrelated factors, from legacies of exclusion to current dynamics of polarization, and that autocratization represents a contingent risk, not an inevitable one, to the extent that institutional responses and citizen mobilization are effective. Thus, the article systematizes contemporary threats to democracy and articulates a model of active resilience for its sustainability.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-12-11
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/4391
10.26441/RD-4086
url https://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/4391
identifier_str_mv 10.26441/RD-4086
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/4391/3100
https://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/4391/3087
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2025 Revista de Derecho
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2025 Revista de Derecho
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Piura
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Piura
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Derecho; Vol. 25 No. 1 (2025); 182-207
Revista de Derecho; Vol. 25 Núm. 1 (2025); 182-207
2664-3669
1608-1714
reponame:Revista de Derecho
instname:Universidad de Piura
instacron:UDEP
instname_str Universidad de Piura
instacron_str UDEP
institution UDEP
reponame_str Revista de Derecho
collection Revista de Derecho
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1852051806794809344
spelling From Democratic Erosion to Autocratization: Patterns and Trends in the Twenty-First CenturyDe la erosión democrática a la autocratización: Patrones y tendencias en el siglo XXICamilo Junior, Valter Geronimo Erosión democráticaautocratizaciónresiliencia institucionalpolarización políticaDemocratic erosiónautocratizationinstitutional resiliencepolitical polarizationDemocratic erosion emerges as a complex global phenomenon that demands a critical analysis of its relationship with the rise of autocratic regimes. This article investigates how this democratic decline fosters autocratization, questioning whether immune democracies exist and how institutions can maintain their resilience in the face of crises. Through a qualitative literature review, contemporary patterns are analyzed, such as the backsliding in Hungary and polarization in the United States, which reveal structural vulnerabilities: institutional weakness, socioeconomic inequalities, and the instrumentalization of the political system. The study is organized into four axes: (1) the scope of erosion, demonstrating that even consolidated democracies are not exempt; (2) its historical and economic roots; (3) the turning point at which erosion becomes a deliberate autocratic project, analyzing the “qualitative leap” that transforms institutional decay into a strategy of power capture; and (4) resistance strategies, where an “architecture of democratic resilience” based on proactive civic vigilance is proposed. It is concluded that erosion arises from interrelated factors, from legacies of exclusion to current dynamics of polarization, and that autocratization represents a contingent risk, not an inevitable one, to the extent that institutional responses and citizen mobilization are effective. Thus, the article systematizes contemporary threats to democracy and articulates a model of active resilience for its sustainability.La erosión democrática surge como un fenómeno global complejo que exige un análisis crítico sobre su relación con el ascenso de regímenes autocráticos. Este artículo investiga cómo este declive democrático favorece la autocratización, cuestionando si existen democracias inmunes y cómo las instituciones pueden mantener su resiliencia frente a las crisis. A través de una revisión bibliográfica cualitativa, se analizan patrones contemporáneos —como el retroceso en Hungría y la polarización en Estados Unidos— que revelan vulnerabilidades estructurales: debilidad institucional, desigualdades socioeconómicas y la instrumentalización del sistema político. El estudio se organiza en cuatro ejes: (1) el alcance de la erosión, demostrando que incluso democracias consolidadas no están exentas; (2) sus raíces históricas y económicas; (3) el punto de inflexión en que la erosión se convierte en un proyecto autocrático deliberado, analizando el “salto cualitativo” que transforma el deterioro institucional en una estrategia de captura del poder; y (4) las estrategias de resistencia, donde se propone una “arquitectura de la resiliencia democrática” basada en la vigilancia cívica proactiva. Se concluye que la erosión surge de factores interrelacionados, desde legados de exclusión hasta dinámicas actuales de polarización, y que la autocratización representa un riesgo contingente, no inevitable, en la medida en que las respuestas institucionales y la movilización ciudadana resulten efectivas. Así, el artículo sistematiza las amenazas contemporáneas a la democracia y articula un modelo de resiliencia activa para su sostenibilidad.Universidad de Piura2025-12-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/439110.26441/RD-4086Revista de Derecho; Vol. 25 No. 1 (2025); 182-207Revista de Derecho; Vol. 25 Núm. 1 (2025); 182-2072664-36691608-1714reponame:Revista de Derechoinstname:Universidad de Piurainstacron:UDEPspahttps://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/4391/3100https://revistas.udep.edu.pe/derecho/article/view/4391/3087Derechos de autor 2025 Revista de Derechoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.udep.edu.pe:article/43912025-12-11T18:24:52Z
score 13.934021
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).