Expert assessment of psychological damage in cases of violence against women. Analysis in the Ecuadorian forensic context
Descripción del Articulo
In Ecuador, there is dissatisfaction due to the lack of uniformity of technical and legal criteria when carrying out psychological expertise on psychological damage in cases of violence against women. This article addresses the current expert action in Ecuador regarding the assessment of psychologic...
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2022 |
Institución: | Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú |
Repositorio: | Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/628 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/628 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | expert assessment psychological damage violence against women ; forensic psychological report risk factors valoración pericial daño psicológico violencia contra la mujer informe psicológico forense factores de riesgo |
id |
REVCSJ_f46b3ebc9776eec623a1039ea83374ed |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/628 |
network_acronym_str |
REVCSJ |
network_name_str |
Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Expert assessment of psychological damage in cases of violence against women. Analysis in the Ecuadorian forensic contextValoración pericial del daño psicológico en casos de violencia contra la mujer. Análisis en el contexto forense ecuatorianoFrancis Bone, Monica Alexandraexpert assessmentpsychological damageviolence against women; forensic psychological reportrisk factorsvaloración pericialdaño psicológicoviolencia contra la mujerinforme psicológico forensefactores de riesgoIn Ecuador, there is dissatisfaction due to the lack of uniformity of technical and legal criteria when carrying out psychological expertise on psychological damage in cases of violence against women. This article addresses the current expert action in Ecuador regarding the assessment of psychological damage in cases of violence against women, according to the Protocol for Judicial Management and Expert Action in Cases of Violence Against Women or Family Members. This research will analyze the limitations encountered by psychology experts when assessing psychological damage, and will show the scope (benefits) that this psychological expertise represents for the legal forum (judges, prosecutors, law enforcement actors in general). Finally, as a recommendation, technical guidelines are offered to facilitate both the work of the expert and the understanding of the forensic psychological report by the judicial authorities.En Ecuador existe descontento por la falta de uniformidad de criterios técnico-jurídicos al realizar las pericias psicológicas de daño psicológico en casos de violencia contra la mujer. En este trabajo se aborda el accionar pericial actual en Ecuador respecto a la valoración del daño psicológico en casos de violencia contra la mujer, a la luz del Protocolo para la Gestión Judicial y Actuación Pericial en Casos de Violencia Contra la Mujer o Miembros del Núcleo Familiar. Se analizan las limitaciones que encuentran los peritos en psicología al momento de realizar la valoración del daño psicológico y se muestran también los alcances (beneficios) que representa para el foro jurídico (jueces, fiscales, actores en general) el contar con esta pericia psicológica. Finalmente, a modo de recomendación, se ofrecen pautas técnicas que facilitarán tanto la labor del perito como la comprensión del informe psicológico forense por parte de las autoridades judiciales.Poder Judicial del Perú2022-11-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmltext/htmlhttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/62810.35292/ropj.v14i18.628Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 14 Núm. 18 (2022): Julio - Diciembre; 273-2882663-91301997-668210.35292/ropj.v14i18reponame:Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perúinstname:Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perúinstacron:CSJspahttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/628/864https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/628/892https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/628/978Derechos de autor 2022 Monica Alexandra Francis Bonehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/6282024-07-10T20:59:23Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Expert assessment of psychological damage in cases of violence against women. Analysis in the Ecuadorian forensic context Valoración pericial del daño psicológico en casos de violencia contra la mujer. Análisis en el contexto forense ecuatoriano |
title |
Expert assessment of psychological damage in cases of violence against women. Analysis in the Ecuadorian forensic context |
spellingShingle |
Expert assessment of psychological damage in cases of violence against women. Analysis in the Ecuadorian forensic context Francis Bone, Monica Alexandra expert assessment psychological damage violence against women ; forensic psychological report risk factors valoración pericial daño psicológico violencia contra la mujer informe psicológico forense factores de riesgo |
title_short |
Expert assessment of psychological damage in cases of violence against women. Analysis in the Ecuadorian forensic context |
title_full |
Expert assessment of psychological damage in cases of violence against women. Analysis in the Ecuadorian forensic context |
title_fullStr |
Expert assessment of psychological damage in cases of violence against women. Analysis in the Ecuadorian forensic context |
title_full_unstemmed |
Expert assessment of psychological damage in cases of violence against women. Analysis in the Ecuadorian forensic context |
title_sort |
Expert assessment of psychological damage in cases of violence against women. Analysis in the Ecuadorian forensic context |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Francis Bone, Monica Alexandra |
author |
Francis Bone, Monica Alexandra |
author_facet |
Francis Bone, Monica Alexandra |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
expert assessment psychological damage violence against women ; forensic psychological report risk factors valoración pericial daño psicológico violencia contra la mujer informe psicológico forense factores de riesgo |
topic |
expert assessment psychological damage violence against women ; forensic psychological report risk factors valoración pericial daño psicológico violencia contra la mujer informe psicológico forense factores de riesgo |
description |
In Ecuador, there is dissatisfaction due to the lack of uniformity of technical and legal criteria when carrying out psychological expertise on psychological damage in cases of violence against women. This article addresses the current expert action in Ecuador regarding the assessment of psychological damage in cases of violence against women, according to the Protocol for Judicial Management and Expert Action in Cases of Violence Against Women or Family Members. This research will analyze the limitations encountered by psychology experts when assessing psychological damage, and will show the scope (benefits) that this psychological expertise represents for the legal forum (judges, prosecutors, law enforcement actors in general). Finally, as a recommendation, technical guidelines are offered to facilitate both the work of the expert and the understanding of the forensic psychological report by the judicial authorities. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-22 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/628 10.35292/ropj.v14i18.628 |
url |
https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/628 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.35292/ropj.v14i18.628 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/628/864 https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/628/892 https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/628/978 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2022 Monica Alexandra Francis Bone https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2022 Monica Alexandra Francis Bone https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/xml text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Poder Judicial del Perú |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Poder Judicial del Perú |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 14 Núm. 18 (2022): Julio - Diciembre; 273-288 2663-9130 1997-6682 10.35292/ropj.v14i18 reponame:Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú instname:Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú instacron:CSJ |
instname_str |
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú |
instacron_str |
CSJ |
institution |
CSJ |
reponame_str |
Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú |
collection |
Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1843987481085607936 |
score |
13.023852 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).