The family processes from the optics of access to justice: towards the consolidation of family procedural law

• Autor: Celis Vásquez, Marco Antonio
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2020
• Institución: Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
• Repositorio: Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/187
• Enlace del recurso: https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/187
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: Family procedural law; Superior interest of children; Dynamic interpretation model; Minimum rights table; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Objectivity, rule of justice; Derecho procesal de familia; Interés superior del niño; Modelo de interpretación dinámica; Catálogo mínimo de derechos; Convención sobre los Derechos del Niño; Objetividad, estado de justicia

Family Procedural Law has been consolidated in the last decade as scholar doctrinary opinions have acknowledged its own characteristics and peculiarities, and the existence of self-governing principles, as well as the requirement to have a judge specialized in this kind of proceedings, with a legal-technical training in family matters, and with a perspective different from the other civil actions. It is important to point out Rogelio Llerena Quevedo’s view as to the role of a judge. He states that: «an unbiased judge interpreting and administering justice could only be taken as one of the best human being. This implies that even if he is the best, he is still human, and therefore, capable of making mistakes. Based on those reasons, there should always be a Code of Ethics as a guide for a good judge».