Access to the administrative contentious jurisdiction

Descripción del Articulo

In classical terms, the administrative-adversary jurisdiction is aimed at hearing all claims filed by claimants against acts of the government administration subject to Administrative Law. However, this traditional concept has been superseded in favor of conceiving it as a channel for a true and sui...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Ledesma Narvaez, Marianella
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
Repositorio:Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/186
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/186
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Administrative-adversary jurisdiction
Effective jurisdictional protection
Administrative silence
Jurisdicción contencioso administrativa
Tutela jurisdiccional efectiva
Silencio administrativo
id REVCSJ_7de464ef76f54cc657c9760b7fba768a
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/186
network_acronym_str REVCSJ
network_name_str Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
repository_id_str
spelling Access to the administrative contentious jurisdictionAcceso a la jurisdicción contencioso administrativa Ledesma Narvaez, MarianellaAdministrative-adversary jurisdictionEffective jurisdictional protectionAdministrative silenceJurisdicción contencioso administrativaTutela jurisdiccional efectivaSilencio administrativoIn classical terms, the administrative-adversary jurisdiction is aimed at hearing all claims filed by claimants against acts of the government administration subject to Administrative Law. However, this traditional concept has been superseded in favor of conceiving it as a channel for a true and suitable effective jurisdictional protection of the legitimate rights and interests of citizens facing any unlawful act committed by the government administration. This fact has produced an increase in the transfer of discussion from the administrative venue to the judicial venue, since adversary proceedings do not refer to administrative acts nor are they conditioned to the contents of said acts and consequently, the center of gravity in the administrative adversary dispute is no longer the administrative act itself but the subjective interests of the citizens that confront the government administrationDesde una visión clásica de la jurisdicción contencioso administrativa, esta se halla orientada a conocer todas aquellas pretensiones deducidas por los administrados contra los actos de la administración pública sujetos al derecho administrativo; sin embargo, esta tradicional concepción se ha venido superando a favor de concebirla como vía para una verdadera y adecuada tutela jurisdiccional efectiva de los derechos e intereses legítimos de los ciudadanos frente a cualquier acto ilícito de la administración pública, lo que ha generado el incremento del traslado de la discusión de sede administrativa a sede judicial, en atención a que las pretensiones contenciosas no están en función del acto administrativo ni tampoco están condicionadas al contenido de dicho acto, y por tanto, el centro de gravedad en el contencioso administrativo ya no es el acto administrativo en sí, sino los intereses subjetivos de los ciudadanos que se enfrentan a la administración públicaPoder Judicial del Perú2020-10-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/18610.35292/ropj.v5i5.186Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 5 Núm. 5 (2009); 163-1782663-91301997-668210.35292/ropj.v5i5reponame:Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perúinstname:Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perúinstacron:CSJspahttps://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/186/246info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/1862021-07-16T04:52:20Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Access to the administrative contentious jurisdiction
Acceso a la jurisdicción contencioso administrativa
title Access to the administrative contentious jurisdiction
spellingShingle Access to the administrative contentious jurisdiction
Ledesma Narvaez, Marianella
Administrative-adversary jurisdiction
Effective jurisdictional protection
Administrative silence
Jurisdicción contencioso administrativa
Tutela jurisdiccional efectiva
Silencio administrativo
title_short Access to the administrative contentious jurisdiction
title_full Access to the administrative contentious jurisdiction
title_fullStr Access to the administrative contentious jurisdiction
title_full_unstemmed Access to the administrative contentious jurisdiction
title_sort Access to the administrative contentious jurisdiction
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ledesma Narvaez, Marianella
author Ledesma Narvaez, Marianella
author_facet Ledesma Narvaez, Marianella
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Administrative-adversary jurisdiction
Effective jurisdictional protection
Administrative silence
Jurisdicción contencioso administrativa
Tutela jurisdiccional efectiva
Silencio administrativo
topic Administrative-adversary jurisdiction
Effective jurisdictional protection
Administrative silence
Jurisdicción contencioso administrativa
Tutela jurisdiccional efectiva
Silencio administrativo
description In classical terms, the administrative-adversary jurisdiction is aimed at hearing all claims filed by claimants against acts of the government administration subject to Administrative Law. However, this traditional concept has been superseded in favor of conceiving it as a channel for a true and suitable effective jurisdictional protection of the legitimate rights and interests of citizens facing any unlawful act committed by the government administration. This fact has produced an increase in the transfer of discussion from the administrative venue to the judicial venue, since adversary proceedings do not refer to administrative acts nor are they conditioned to the contents of said acts and consequently, the center of gravity in the administrative adversary dispute is no longer the administrative act itself but the subjective interests of the citizens that confront the government administration
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/186
10.35292/ropj.v5i5.186
url https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/186
identifier_str_mv 10.35292/ropj.v5i5.186
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/186/246
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Poder Judicial del Perú
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Poder Judicial del Perú
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Oficial del Poder Judicial; Vol. 5 Núm. 5 (2009); 163-178
2663-9130
1997-6682
10.35292/ropj.v5i5
reponame:Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
instname:Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
instacron:CSJ
instname_str Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
instacron_str CSJ
institution CSJ
reponame_str Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
collection Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1843353299326074880
score 13.243791
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).