The positioning of the theory of mediated authorship by organization in Peruvian jurisprudence. Analysis of the dogmatic legal theory of the Supreme Court's decision against Alberto Fujimori

• Autor: Pariona Arana, Raúl
• Formato: artículo
• Fecha de Publicación: 2011
• Institución: Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
• Repositorio: Revistas - Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú
• Lenguaje: español
• OAI Identifier: oai:revistas.pj.gob.pe:article/205
• Enlace del recurso: https://revistas.pj.gob.pe/revista/index.php/ropj/article/view/205
• Nivel de acceso: acceso abierto
• Materia: indirect perpetratorship; organized power structures; power over the organization; commanding power; fungibility; willingness to comply with the wishes of the executor; crimes against humanity; autoría mediata; aparatos de poder organizados; dominio sobre la organización; poder de mando; fungibilidad; elevada disposición al hecho del ejecutor; crímenes contra la humanidad

In a historical ruling, unprecedented in national law, and one of the most relevant sentences in international case law, the National Criminal Division of the Supreme Court of Peru convicted the former president Alberto Fujimori Fujimori as the indirect perpetrator of crimes against humanity, essentially on the grounds of the theory of the indirect perpetrator by organization, to judge those crimes perpetrated through organized power structures. The study recalls the origin and background of the theory, analyzing and providing critical opinions on the grounds of the sentence in relation to the criminal participation of the former Peruvian head of state, which sets the bases for national case law and consolidates the indirect perpetratorship in our midst.