Discourse and Ideology. The Relation Mexico-US regarding the Border Wall
Descripción del Articulo
Latin America´s historical migration to North America has es- tablished a deep cultural, economic and political bond between Mexico and US, by means of institutional discursive process in each new North-American government. The candidate Donald Trump proposed the construction of a border wall during...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2019 |
| Institución: | Universidad de San Martín de Porres |
| Repositorio: | Correspondencias & Análisis |
| Lenguaje: | inglés español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs2.ojs.correspondenciasyanalisis.com:article/342 |
| Enlace del recurso: | http://ojs.correspondenciasyanalisis.com/index.php/Journalcya/article/view/342 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Discurso Ideología Multimodalidad Campaña electoral Política internacional |
| id |
REVCOA_a0aa28881b7cfe168c7609964c7c0f0b |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.ojs.correspondenciasyanalisis.com:article/342 |
| network_acronym_str |
REVCOA |
| network_name_str |
Correspondencias & Análisis |
| repository_id_str |
|
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Discourse and Ideology. The Relation Mexico-US regarding the Border Wall Discourse and Ideology. The Relation Mexico-US regarding the Border Wall |
| title |
Discourse and Ideology. The Relation Mexico-US regarding the Border Wall |
| spellingShingle |
Discourse and Ideology. The Relation Mexico-US regarding the Border Wall Ahuactzin Martinez, Carlos Discurso Ideología Multimodalidad Campaña electoral Política internacional |
| title_short |
Discourse and Ideology. The Relation Mexico-US regarding the Border Wall |
| title_full |
Discourse and Ideology. The Relation Mexico-US regarding the Border Wall |
| title_fullStr |
Discourse and Ideology. The Relation Mexico-US regarding the Border Wall |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Discourse and Ideology. The Relation Mexico-US regarding the Border Wall |
| title_sort |
Discourse and Ideology. The Relation Mexico-US regarding the Border Wall |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Ahuactzin Martinez, Carlos Torres Rodríguez, Ignacio |
| author |
Ahuactzin Martinez, Carlos |
| author_facet |
Ahuactzin Martinez, Carlos Torres Rodríguez, Ignacio |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Torres Rodríguez, Ignacio |
| author2_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Discurso Ideología Multimodalidad Campaña electoral Política internacional |
| topic |
Discurso Ideología Multimodalidad Campaña electoral Política internacional |
| description |
Latin America´s historical migration to North America has es- tablished a deep cultural, economic and political bond between Mexico and US, by means of institutional discursive process in each new North-American government. The candidate Donald Trump proposed the construction of a border wall during his electoral campaign, with the purpose of stopping Mexican migration, drug trafficking and transboundary criminals. In this context, the study analyses the discourse and communicative framework of the border wall, on the basis of Critical Discourse Analysis and the Ideo- logical Studies of Right-Wing Populism. The corpus of the work developed in the Political Communication Laboratory of the Government Sciences and Strategic Development Institute considers two discursive processes: a) Trump´s statements and electoral advertising on TV, and b) Enrique Peña Nieto´s statements on TV. The analysis incorporates the perspective of the multimodal discourse; therefore, audiovisual language is explored in its dimensions. The research questions are the following: how does foreign policy has been conceived with regard to the bilateral relation US-Mexico? And in which way the Mexican citizens are represented in the border wall´s discourse? This qualitative perspective organizes the multi- modal categories in: a) sound, b) visual and c) linguistic levels. Two political dimensions articulate the study: a) the legitimacy of foreign policy and b) citizens´ representation within the discourse. The labeling pro- cess of the corpus incorporates the use of ELAN software, which allows the integration of the analysis levels, conceived in the multimodal discourse com- position. The analysis outcomes establish the ideological discursive lines of both, Mexican and American institutional leaders, and allow an under- standing of the discursive strategies that have established foreign policy in this region of North America. |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-11-25 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://ojs.correspondenciasyanalisis.com/index.php/Journalcya/article/view/342 10.24265/cian.2019.n10.01 |
| url |
http://ojs.correspondenciasyanalisis.com/index.php/Journalcya/article/view/342 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.24265/cian.2019.n10.01 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng spa |
| language |
eng spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://ojs.correspondenciasyanalisis.com/index.php/Journalcya/article/view/342/409 http://ojs.correspondenciasyanalisis.com/index.php/Journalcya/article/view/342/424 http://ojs.correspondenciasyanalisis.com/index.php/Journalcya/article/view/342/725 http://ojs.correspondenciasyanalisis.com/index.php/Journalcya/article/view/342/468 /*ref*/Ahuactzin, C. (2017). Electoral television advertising and persuasion in Puebla 2010. An approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Comuni- cación y Sociedad, 29, 41-68. /*ref*/Baldry, A. & Thibault, P. (2006). Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis. A multimedia toolkit and coursebook. Londres: Equinox. /*ref*/Benoit, W. & Glatz, M. (2017). Persuasive Attacks on Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Primary. Nueva York: Lexington Books. /*ref*/Brower, J. (2010). El estatus semiótico-discursivo de la ideología: aportes para la re-lectura del discurso político. Boletín de Lingüística 22(33), 114-130. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.ve/scielo.php?script=sci-_arttextpid=S0798-97092010000100006&lang=pt /*ref*/Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and Practice. Londres: Routledge. /*ref*/Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. Nueva York: Longman. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Nueva York: Longman. /*ref*/Fairclough, N. (2006). Semiosis, ideology and mediation: A dialectical view. En I. Lassen, J. Strunck & T. Vestergaard (Eds.), Mediating Ideology in Text and Image. Ten Critical Studies. Ámsterdan: John Benjamins Publishing. /*ref*/Fairclough, N. (2018). CDA as dialectical reasoning. En J. Flowerdew & J. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. Nueva York: Routledge. /*ref*/Fairclough, I. & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political Discourse Analysis. Lon- dres: Routledge. /*ref*/Fuchsman, K. (2017). The Presidential Campaign That Astounded the World: A Psychohistory of Donald Trump and the 2016 American Election. The Journal of Psychohistory, 44(4), 292-309. /*ref*/Gantt, J. (2017). Donald Trump’s “Political Incorrectness”: Neoliberalism as Frontstage Racism on Social Media. Social Media + Society, 1-10. doi: 10.1177/2056305117733226 /*ref*/Halliday, M. (2001). El lenguaje como semiótica social. La interpretación social del lenguaje y del significado. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica. /*ref*/Heyer, K. (2018). Internalized Borders: Immigration Ethics in the Age of Trump. Theological Studies, 79(1), 146-164. /*ref*/Jewitt, C. (2014a). An introduction to multimodality. En C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis (pp. 14-27). Nueva York: Routledge. /*ref*/Jewitt, C. (2014b). Different approaches to multimodality. En C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis (pp. 28-39). Nueva York: Routledge. /*ref*/Korostelina, K. (2017). Trump Effect. Nueva York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis. /*ref*/Kress, G. (2012). Multimodal Discourse Analysis. En J. Gee, & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 35-50). Londres: Routledge. /*ref*/Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse. The modes and media of contemporary communication. Londres: Hodder Arnold. /*ref*/Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images. The Grammar of Visu- al Design. Londres: Routledge. /*ref*/Martin, P. (2017). Election of Donald Trump and migration. Migration Let- ters, 14(1), 161-171. /*ref*/Mayr, A. (2008). Introduction: Power, discourse and institutions. En A. Mayr (Ed.), Language and Power. An Introduction to Institutional Dis- course (pp. 1-25). Londres: Continuum. /*ref*/Mohammadi, M. & Javadi, J. (2017). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Donald Trump´s Language Use in US Presidential Campaign, 2016. Interna- tional Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(5). /*ref*/Rastier, F. (2005). Semántica interpretativa. México, DF: Siglo XXI Editores. /*ref*/Schubert, C. (2017). Constructing Mexican Stereotypes: Telecinematic Dis- course and Donald Trump´s Campaign Rhetoric. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 8(2), 37-57. /*ref*/Standford University (2016). Campaign 2016 - Presidential General Election Ads. Recuperado de https://pcl.stanford.edu/campaigns/2016 /*ref*/Trump, D. (2018a). Remarks Announcing Candidacy for President in New York City (16 de junio de 2015. En J. Woolley & G. Peters, The Amer- ican Presidency Project. Recuperado de http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/index.php /*ref*/Trump, D. (2018b). Press Release - Donald J. Trump: Compelling Mexico to Pay for the Wall (5 de abril de 2016). En J. Woolley & G. Peters, The American Presidency Project. Recuperado de http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/index.php /*ref*/Trump, D. (2018c). Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, Ohio (21 de julio de 2016). En J. Woolley & G. Peters, The American Presidency Project. Recuperado de http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/index.php /*ref*/Van Dijk, T. (1998). Ideology. Londres: Sage Publications. /*ref*/Van Dijk, T. (2005a). Ideología y análisis del discurso. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, 10(29), 9-36. /*ref*/Van Dijk, T. (2005b). Política, ideología y discurso. Quórum Académico, 2(2), 15-47. /*ref*/Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing Social Semiotics. Nueva York: Routledge. Van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication, 1(1), 91-112. /*ref*/Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Nueva York: Oxford University Press. /*ref*/Van Leeuwen, T. (2009). Discourse as the recontextualization of social prac- tice: a guide. En R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 162-186). Londres: Sage. /*ref*/Wodak, R. (2015). The Politics of Fear. What Right-Wing Populist Dis- courses Mean. Londres: Sage. /*ref*/Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: history, agenda, theory and methodology. En R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 1-33). Londres: Sage. /*ref*/Woolley, J. & Peters, G. (2018). The American Presidency Project. Recuperado de http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/index.php |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2019 Carlos Ahuactzin Martinez, Ignacio Torres Rodríguez http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2019 Carlos Ahuactzin Martinez, Ignacio Torres Rodríguez http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html application/xml application/zip |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad San Martín de Porres. Escuela Profesional de Ciencias de la Comunicación. Instituto de Investigación |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad San Martín de Porres. Escuela Profesional de Ciencias de la Comunicación. Instituto de Investigación |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Correspondences & Analysis; No 10 (2019): Correspondences & analysis N°10 2019 (july - december) Correspondencias & análisis; Núm. 10 (2019): Correspondencias & análisis N°10 2019 (julio - diciembre) 2304-2265 2224-235X reponame:Correspondencias & Análisis instname:Universidad de San Martín de Porres instacron:USMP |
| instname_str |
Universidad de San Martín de Porres |
| instacron_str |
USMP |
| institution |
USMP |
| reponame_str |
Correspondencias & Análisis |
| collection |
Correspondencias & Análisis |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1804948307738361856 |
| spelling |
Discourse and Ideology. The Relation Mexico-US regarding the Border WallDiscourse and Ideology. The Relation Mexico-US regarding the Border WallAhuactzin Martinez, CarlosTorres Rodríguez, IgnacioDiscursoIdeologíaMultimodalidadCampaña electoralPolítica internacionalLatin America´s historical migration to North America has es- tablished a deep cultural, economic and political bond between Mexico and US, by means of institutional discursive process in each new North-American government. The candidate Donald Trump proposed the construction of a border wall during his electoral campaign, with the purpose of stopping Mexican migration, drug trafficking and transboundary criminals. In this context, the study analyses the discourse and communicative framework of the border wall, on the basis of Critical Discourse Analysis and the Ideo- logical Studies of Right-Wing Populism. The corpus of the work developed in the Political Communication Laboratory of the Government Sciences and Strategic Development Institute considers two discursive processes: a) Trump´s statements and electoral advertising on TV, and b) Enrique Peña Nieto´s statements on TV. The analysis incorporates the perspective of the multimodal discourse; therefore, audiovisual language is explored in its dimensions. The research questions are the following: how does foreign policy has been conceived with regard to the bilateral relation US-Mexico? And in which way the Mexican citizens are represented in the border wall´s discourse? This qualitative perspective organizes the multi- modal categories in: a) sound, b) visual and c) linguistic levels. Two political dimensions articulate the study: a) the legitimacy of foreign policy and b) citizens´ representation within the discourse. The labeling pro- cess of the corpus incorporates the use of ELAN software, which allows the integration of the analysis levels, conceived in the multimodal discourse com- position. The analysis outcomes establish the ideological discursive lines of both, Mexican and American institutional leaders, and allow an under- standing of the discursive strategies that have established foreign policy in this region of North America.La migración histórica de Latinoamérica hacia Norteamérica ha establecido un profundo vínculo cultural, económico y político entre México y los Estados Unidos, mediante un proceso discursivo institucional de cada nuevo gobierno norteamericano. El entonces candidato Donald Trump propu- so la construcción de un muro fronterizo durante su campaña electoral, con el propósito de detener la migración mexicana, el narcotráfico y los criminales transfronterizos. En este contexto, el estudio analiza el discurso y el marco comunicativo del muro fronterizo, sobre la base del análisis crítico del discur- so y los estudios ideológicos del populismo de derecha. El corpus del trabajo desarrollado en el Laboratorio de Comunicación Política del Instituto de Ciencias de Gobierno y Desarrollo Estratégico considera dos procesos discursivos: a) las declaraciones de Trump y la publicidad electoral en la televisión, y b) las declaraciones de Enrique Peña Nieto en la televisión. El análisis incorpora la perspectiva del discurso multimodal; por lo tanto, el lenguaje audiovisual se explora en sus dimensiones. Las preguntas de inves- tigación son las siguientes: ¿cómo se ha concebido la política exterior con respecto a la relación bilateral entre los Estados Unidos y México? y ¿de qué manera los ciudadanos mexicanos están representados en el discurso del muro fronterizo? Esta perspectiva cualitativa organiza las categorías multimodales en tres niveles: a) sonoros, b) visuales y c) lingüísticos. Dos dimensiones políticas articulan el estudio: a) la legitimidad de la políti- ca exterior y b) la representación de los ciudadanos dentro del discurso. El proceso de etiquetado del corpus incorpora el uso del software ELAN, que permite la integración de los niveles de análisis, concebidos en la composi- ción del discurso multimodal. Los resultados del análisis establecen las líneas ideológicas discursivas de ambos líderes institucionales (mexicano y estadou- nidense) y permiten una comprensión de las estrategias discursivas que han configurado la política exterior en América del Norte.Universidad San Martín de Porres. Escuela Profesional de Ciencias de la Comunicación. Instituto de Investigación2019-11-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/xmlapplication/ziphttp://ojs.correspondenciasyanalisis.com/index.php/Journalcya/article/view/34210.24265/cian.2019.n10.01Correspondences & Analysis; No 10 (2019): Correspondences & analysis N°10 2019 (july - december)Correspondencias & análisis; Núm. 10 (2019): Correspondencias & análisis N°10 2019 (julio - diciembre)2304-22652224-235Xreponame:Correspondencias & Análisisinstname:Universidad de San Martín de Porresinstacron:USMPengspahttp://ojs.correspondenciasyanalisis.com/index.php/Journalcya/article/view/342/409http://ojs.correspondenciasyanalisis.com/index.php/Journalcya/article/view/342/424http://ojs.correspondenciasyanalisis.com/index.php/Journalcya/article/view/342/725http://ojs.correspondenciasyanalisis.com/index.php/Journalcya/article/view/342/468/*ref*/Ahuactzin, C. (2017). Electoral television advertising and persuasion in Puebla 2010. An approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Comuni- cación y Sociedad, 29, 41-68./*ref*/Baldry, A. & Thibault, P. (2006). Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis. A multimedia toolkit and coursebook. Londres: Equinox./*ref*/Benoit, W. & Glatz, M. (2017). Persuasive Attacks on Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Primary. Nueva York: Lexington Books./*ref*/Brower, J. (2010). El estatus semiótico-discursivo de la ideología: aportes para la re-lectura del discurso político. Boletín de Lingüística 22(33), 114-130. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.ve/scielo.php?script=sci-_arttextpid=S0798-97092010000100006&lang=pt/*ref*/Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and Practice. Londres: Routledge./*ref*/Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. Nueva York: Longman. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Nueva York: Longman./*ref*/Fairclough, N. (2006). Semiosis, ideology and mediation: A dialectical view. En I. Lassen, J. Strunck & T. Vestergaard (Eds.), Mediating Ideology in Text and Image. Ten Critical Studies. Ámsterdan: John Benjamins Publishing./*ref*/Fairclough, N. (2018). CDA as dialectical reasoning. En J. Flowerdew & J. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. Nueva York: Routledge./*ref*/Fairclough, I. & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political Discourse Analysis. Lon- dres: Routledge./*ref*/Fuchsman, K. (2017). The Presidential Campaign That Astounded the World: A Psychohistory of Donald Trump and the 2016 American Election. The Journal of Psychohistory, 44(4), 292-309./*ref*/Gantt, J. (2017). Donald Trump’s “Political Incorrectness”: Neoliberalism as Frontstage Racism on Social Media. Social Media + Society, 1-10. doi: 10.1177/2056305117733226/*ref*/Halliday, M. (2001). El lenguaje como semiótica social. La interpretación social del lenguaje y del significado. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica./*ref*/Heyer, K. (2018). Internalized Borders: Immigration Ethics in the Age of Trump. Theological Studies, 79(1), 146-164./*ref*/Jewitt, C. (2014a). An introduction to multimodality. En C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis (pp. 14-27). Nueva York: Routledge./*ref*/Jewitt, C. (2014b). Different approaches to multimodality. En C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis (pp. 28-39). Nueva York: Routledge./*ref*/Korostelina, K. (2017). Trump Effect. Nueva York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis./*ref*/Kress, G. (2012). Multimodal Discourse Analysis. En J. Gee, & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 35-50). Londres: Routledge./*ref*/Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse. The modes and media of contemporary communication. Londres: Hodder Arnold./*ref*/Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images. The Grammar of Visu- al Design. Londres: Routledge./*ref*/Martin, P. (2017). Election of Donald Trump and migration. Migration Let- ters, 14(1), 161-171./*ref*/Mayr, A. (2008). Introduction: Power, discourse and institutions. En A. Mayr (Ed.), Language and Power. An Introduction to Institutional Dis- course (pp. 1-25). Londres: Continuum./*ref*/Mohammadi, M. & Javadi, J. (2017). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Donald Trump´s Language Use in US Presidential Campaign, 2016. Interna- tional Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6(5)./*ref*/Rastier, F. (2005). Semántica interpretativa. México, DF: Siglo XXI Editores./*ref*/Schubert, C. (2017). Constructing Mexican Stereotypes: Telecinematic Dis- course and Donald Trump´s Campaign Rhetoric. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines, 8(2), 37-57./*ref*/Standford University (2016). Campaign 2016 - Presidential General Election Ads. Recuperado de https://pcl.stanford.edu/campaigns/2016/*ref*/Trump, D. (2018a). Remarks Announcing Candidacy for President in New York City (16 de junio de 2015. En J. Woolley & G. Peters, The Amer- ican Presidency Project. Recuperado de http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/index.php/*ref*/Trump, D. (2018b). Press Release - Donald J. Trump: Compelling Mexico to Pay for the Wall (5 de abril de 2016). En J. Woolley & G. Peters, The American Presidency Project. Recuperado de http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/index.php/*ref*/Trump, D. (2018c). Address Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, Ohio (21 de julio de 2016). En J. Woolley & G. Peters, The American Presidency Project. Recuperado de http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/index.php/*ref*/Van Dijk, T. (1998). Ideology. Londres: Sage Publications./*ref*/Van Dijk, T. (2005a). Ideología y análisis del discurso. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, 10(29), 9-36./*ref*/Van Dijk, T. (2005b). Política, ideología y discurso. Quórum Académico, 2(2), 15-47./*ref*/Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing Social Semiotics. Nueva York: Routledge. Van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication, 1(1), 91-112./*ref*/Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Nueva York: Oxford University Press./*ref*/Van Leeuwen, T. (2009). Discourse as the recontextualization of social prac- tice: a guide. En R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 162-186). Londres: Sage./*ref*/Wodak, R. (2015). The Politics of Fear. What Right-Wing Populist Dis- courses Mean. Londres: Sage./*ref*/Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: history, agenda, theory and methodology. En R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 1-33). Londres: Sage./*ref*/Woolley, J. & Peters, G. (2018). The American Presidency Project. Recuperado de http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/index.phpDerechos de autor 2019 Carlos Ahuactzin Martinez, Ignacio Torres Rodríguezhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ojs2.ojs.correspondenciasyanalisis.com:article/3422023-05-05T20:57:04Z |
| score |
13.990953 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
