RETURN TO LITERATURE A MANIFESTO IN FAVOR OF THEORY AND AGAINST METHODOLOGICALLY REACTIONARY STUDIES

Descripción del Articulo

What is literature for us today? And what will become of it in the nextfew years? Our era only seems willing to recognize the complexity of the field ofscience; whereas as far as literature is concerned, it is still thought that a rigorous training is not necessary and many deceive themselves into t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Bottiroli, Giovanni
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2019
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs2.www.metaforarevista.com:article/151
Enlace del recurso:https://www.metaforarevista.com/index.php/meta/article/view/151
id REVAPR_2700112e8c0ba8f8c12c20c316687e0c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.www.metaforarevista.com:article/151
network_acronym_str REVAPR
network_name_str Metáfora
repository_id_str
spelling RETURN TO LITERATURE A MANIFESTO IN FAVOR OF THEORY AND AGAINST METHODOLOGICALLY REACTIONARY STUDIESRETORNO A LA LITERATURA: UN MANIFIESTO A FAVOR DE LA TEORÍA Y CONTRA LOS ESTUDIOS METODOLÓGICAMENTE REACCIONARIOS (CULTURAL STUDIES, ETC.)Bottiroli, GiovanniWhat is literature for us today? And what will become of it in the nextfew years? Our era only seems willing to recognize the complexity of the field ofscience; whereas as far as literature is concerned, it is still thought that a rigorous training is not necessary and many deceive themselves into thinking that it is possible to do without the analytical tools created in the twentieth century and more recently thanks to theory.The refusal of theory is justified by the most tenacious prejudices, or simply by badfaith. It is believed (or some pretend to believe) that literary theory coincides with the years of structuralism, with the primacy of linguistics, and with the thesis of theintransitivity of language.Reality is quite different. Literary theory is a hybrid space where linguistics, rhetoric,philosophy and the theories of desire merge and interweave. In this space, whichundergoes constant renewal, literature is understood to be an intellectual andemotive experience, and an irreplaceable source of knowledge. Literary texts arestudied as dynamic objects that are able to cross the borders of the era in which theywere produced and enter the g”reat time (as Bakhtin called it).¿Qué es para nosotros hoy la literatura? ¿Y qué podrá ser en los próximos años? Nuestra época parece dispuesta a reconocerle la complejidad solo al campo de la ciencia; y, sin embargo, en lo que concierne a la literatura, se sigue pensando que no es necesaria una formación rigurosa y se cae en el error de creer que se puede prescindir de los instrumentos de análisis creados gracias a la teoría en el siglo XX y, más recientemente, en los primeros dos decenios del siglo XXI. El rechazo de la teoría se justifica mediante los más obstinados prejuicios o simplemente por la mala fe. Se cree (o se finge creer) que la teoría de la literatura coincide con los años del estructuralismo, con el liderazgo de la lingüística y la tesis de la intransitividad del lenguaje. La realidad es sumamente diversa. La teoría de la literatura es un espacio híbrido, donde confluyen y se entrelazan la lingüística y la retórica, la filosofía y las teorías del deseo. En este espacio, que se renueva continuamente, la literatura se considera una experiencia intelectual y emotiva, y una fuente insustituible de conocimiento. Los textos literarios tienen que ser estudiados como objetos dinámicos, capaces de ir más allá de los límites de la época en la que se produjeron, y de entrar en el “tiempo grande” (como lo llamó Bajtín).Asociación Peruana de Retórica2019-02-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.metaforarevista.com/index.php/meta/article/view/15110.36286/mrlad.v1i2.17METÁFORA REVISTA DE LITERATURA Y ANÁLISIS DEL DISCURSO; Vol. 1 Núm. 2 (2019)2617-4839spahttps://www.metaforarevista.com/index.php/meta/article/view/151/128Derechos de autor 2019 Giovanni Bottirolihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0oai:ojs2.www.metaforarevista.com:article/1512022-03-26T04:39:54Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv RETURN TO LITERATURE A MANIFESTO IN FAVOR OF THEORY AND AGAINST METHODOLOGICALLY REACTIONARY STUDIES
RETORNO A LA LITERATURA: UN MANIFIESTO A FAVOR DE LA TEORÍA Y CONTRA LOS ESTUDIOS METODOLÓGICAMENTE REACCIONARIOS (CULTURAL STUDIES, ETC.)
title RETURN TO LITERATURE A MANIFESTO IN FAVOR OF THEORY AND AGAINST METHODOLOGICALLY REACTIONARY STUDIES
spellingShingle RETURN TO LITERATURE A MANIFESTO IN FAVOR OF THEORY AND AGAINST METHODOLOGICALLY REACTIONARY STUDIES
Bottiroli, Giovanni
title_short RETURN TO LITERATURE A MANIFESTO IN FAVOR OF THEORY AND AGAINST METHODOLOGICALLY REACTIONARY STUDIES
title_full RETURN TO LITERATURE A MANIFESTO IN FAVOR OF THEORY AND AGAINST METHODOLOGICALLY REACTIONARY STUDIES
title_fullStr RETURN TO LITERATURE A MANIFESTO IN FAVOR OF THEORY AND AGAINST METHODOLOGICALLY REACTIONARY STUDIES
title_full_unstemmed RETURN TO LITERATURE A MANIFESTO IN FAVOR OF THEORY AND AGAINST METHODOLOGICALLY REACTIONARY STUDIES
title_sort RETURN TO LITERATURE A MANIFESTO IN FAVOR OF THEORY AND AGAINST METHODOLOGICALLY REACTIONARY STUDIES
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Bottiroli, Giovanni
author Bottiroli, Giovanni
author_facet Bottiroli, Giovanni
author_role author
description What is literature for us today? And what will become of it in the nextfew years? Our era only seems willing to recognize the complexity of the field ofscience; whereas as far as literature is concerned, it is still thought that a rigorous training is not necessary and many deceive themselves into thinking that it is possible to do without the analytical tools created in the twentieth century and more recently thanks to theory.The refusal of theory is justified by the most tenacious prejudices, or simply by badfaith. It is believed (or some pretend to believe) that literary theory coincides with the years of structuralism, with the primacy of linguistics, and with the thesis of theintransitivity of language.Reality is quite different. Literary theory is a hybrid space where linguistics, rhetoric,philosophy and the theories of desire merge and interweave. In this space, whichundergoes constant renewal, literature is understood to be an intellectual andemotive experience, and an irreplaceable source of knowledge. Literary texts arestudied as dynamic objects that are able to cross the borders of the era in which theywere produced and enter the g”reat time (as Bakhtin called it).
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-02-20
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://www.metaforarevista.com/index.php/meta/article/view/151
10.36286/mrlad.v1i2.17
url https://www.metaforarevista.com/index.php/meta/article/view/151
identifier_str_mv 10.36286/mrlad.v1i2.17
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.metaforarevista.com/index.php/meta/article/view/151/128
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2019 Giovanni Bottiroli
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2019 Giovanni Bottiroli
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Asociación Peruana de Retórica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Asociación Peruana de Retórica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv METÁFORA REVISTA DE LITERATURA Y ANÁLISIS DEL DISCURSO; Vol. 1 Núm. 2 (2019)
2617-4839
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1741978177967751168
score 13.95948
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).