“Fool me once, ...”: deception, morality and self-regeneration in decentralized markets

Descripción del Articulo

Purpose - This paper aims to provide an overall review and assessment of the virtues and flaws of decentralized self-regulated markets, discussing in particular the extent to which deceiving attitudes by some market participants might be potentially diluted and contradicted. Design/methodology/appro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Gomes, Orlando, Frade, João
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2019
Institución:Universidad ESAN
Repositorio:ESAN-Institucional
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.esan.edu.pe:20.500.12640/2569
Enlace del recurso:https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/75
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12640/2569
https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-04-2018-0032
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Markets
Deception
Morality
Purchasing decisions
Preferences
Rumour spreading
Mercados
Engaño
Moralidad
Decisiones de compra
Preferencias
Difusión de rumores
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.02.04
id ESAN_af65368a2824adee78acd4a8a11492b8
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.esan.edu.pe:20.500.12640/2569
network_acronym_str ESAN
network_name_str ESAN-Institucional
repository_id_str 4835
dc.title.en_EN.fl_str_mv “Fool me once, ...”: deception, morality and self-regeneration in decentralized markets
title “Fool me once, ...”: deception, morality and self-regeneration in decentralized markets
spellingShingle “Fool me once, ...”: deception, morality and self-regeneration in decentralized markets
Gomes, Orlando
Markets
Deception
Morality
Purchasing decisions
Preferences
Rumour spreading
Mercados
Engaño
Moralidad
Decisiones de compra
Preferencias
Difusión de rumores
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.02.04
title_short “Fool me once, ...”: deception, morality and self-regeneration in decentralized markets
title_full “Fool me once, ...”: deception, morality and self-regeneration in decentralized markets
title_fullStr “Fool me once, ...”: deception, morality and self-regeneration in decentralized markets
title_full_unstemmed “Fool me once, ...”: deception, morality and self-regeneration in decentralized markets
title_sort “Fool me once, ...”: deception, morality and self-regeneration in decentralized markets
author Gomes, Orlando
author_facet Gomes, Orlando
Frade, João
author_role author
author2 Frade, João
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gomes, Orlando
Frade, João
dc.subject.en_EN.fl_str_mv Markets
Deception
Morality
Purchasing decisions
Preferences
Rumour spreading
topic Markets
Deception
Morality
Purchasing decisions
Preferences
Rumour spreading
Mercados
Engaño
Moralidad
Decisiones de compra
Preferencias
Difusión de rumores
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.02.04
dc.subject.es_ES.fl_str_mv Mercados
Engaño
Moralidad
Decisiones de compra
Preferencias
Difusión de rumores
dc.subject.ocde.none.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.02.04
description Purpose - This paper aims to provide an overall review and assessment of the virtues and flaws of decentralized self-regulated markets, discussing in particular the extent to which deceiving attitudes by some market participants might be potentially diluted and contradicted. Design/methodology/approach - To approach deception and morality in markets, the paper follows two paths. First, the relevant recent literature on the theme is reviewed, examined and debated, and second, one constructs a simulation model equipped with the required elements to discuss the immediate and longterm impacts of deceiving behaviour over market outcomes. Findings - The discussion and the model allow for highlighting the main drivers of the purchasing decisions of consumers and for evaluating how they react to manipulating behaviour by firms in the market. Agents pursuing short-run gains through unfair market practices are likely to be punished as fooled agents spread the word about the malpractices they were allegedly subject to. Research limitations/implications - Markets are complex entities, where large numbers of individual agents typically establish local and direct contact with one another. These agents differ in many respects and interact in unpredictable ways. Assembling a concise model capable of addressing such complexity is a difficult task. The framework proposed in this paper points in the intended direction. Originality/value - The debate in this paper contributes to a stronger perception on the mechanisms that attribute robustness and vitality to markets.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-26T19:38:02Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-26T19:38:02Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019-12-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.version.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.other.none.fl_str_mv Artículo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/75
dc.identifier.citation.none.fl_str_mv Gomes, O., & Frade, J. (2019). “Fool me once, ...”: deception, morality and self-regeneration in decentralized markets. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 24(48), 312-326. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-04-2018-0032
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12640/2569
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-04-2018-0032
url https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/75
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12640/2569
https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-04-2018-0032
identifier_str_mv Gomes, O., & Frade, J. (2019). “Fool me once, ...”: deception, morality and self-regeneration in decentralized markets. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 24(48), 312-326. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-04-2018-0032
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv urn:issn:2218-0648
dc.relation.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/75/58
dc.rights.en.fl_str_mv Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.es_ES.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.es_ES.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad ESAN. ESAN Ediciones
dc.publisher.country.none.fl_str_mv PE
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad ESAN. ESAN Ediciones
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:ESAN-Institucional
instname:Universidad ESAN
instacron:ESAN
instname_str Universidad ESAN
instacron_str ESAN
institution ESAN
reponame_str ESAN-Institucional
collection ESAN-Institucional
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.esan.edu.pe/bitstreams/7e7a5306-00aa-47d7-87d6-80e7678eea57/download
https://repositorio.esan.edu.pe/bitstreams/d325acb6-6570-475d-ad92-899e9a52eb76/download
https://repositorio.esan.edu.pe/bitstreams/bd4d9907-7d09-4756-a834-b96abc99d000/download
https://repositorio.esan.edu.pe/bitstreams/32d56683-e332-4a11-98b6-a34b3422b353/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv a51df45b73712f0a9a099afe60afae36
c00a4a5674445e5aa14c1130b4e69aa9
e9386396626984749ca1967eaad3dd5d
9540158af94693892bd2dfd5639596b5
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional ESAN
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@esan.edu.pe
_version_ 1843261871576055808
spelling Gomes, OrlandoFrade, João2021-10-26T19:38:02Z2021-10-26T19:38:02Z2019-12-01https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/75Gomes, O., & Frade, J. (2019). “Fool me once, ...”: deception, morality and self-regeneration in decentralized markets. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 24(48), 312-326. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-04-2018-0032https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12640/2569https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-04-2018-0032Purpose - This paper aims to provide an overall review and assessment of the virtues and flaws of decentralized self-regulated markets, discussing in particular the extent to which deceiving attitudes by some market participants might be potentially diluted and contradicted. Design/methodology/approach - To approach deception and morality in markets, the paper follows two paths. First, the relevant recent literature on the theme is reviewed, examined and debated, and second, one constructs a simulation model equipped with the required elements to discuss the immediate and longterm impacts of deceiving behaviour over market outcomes. Findings - The discussion and the model allow for highlighting the main drivers of the purchasing decisions of consumers and for evaluating how they react to manipulating behaviour by firms in the market. Agents pursuing short-run gains through unfair market practices are likely to be punished as fooled agents spread the word about the malpractices they were allegedly subject to. Research limitations/implications - Markets are complex entities, where large numbers of individual agents typically establish local and direct contact with one another. These agents differ in many respects and interact in unpredictable ways. Assembling a concise model capable of addressing such complexity is a difficult task. The framework proposed in this paper points in the intended direction. Originality/value - The debate in this paper contributes to a stronger perception on the mechanisms that attribute robustness and vitality to markets.Objetivo - Este documento tiene como objetivo proporcionar una revisión y evaluación general de las virtudes y defectos de los mercados autorregulados descentralizados, discutiendo en particular hasta qué punto las actitudes engañosas de algunos participantes del mercado podrían diluirse y contradecirse potencialmente. Diseño / metodología / enfoque - Para abordar el engaño y la moralidad en los mercados, el artículo sigue dos caminos. Primero, se revisa, examina y debate la literatura reciente relevante sobre el tema, y ​​segundo, se construye un modelo de simulación equipado con los elementos necesarios para discutir los impactos inmediatos y a largo plazo del comportamiento engañoso sobre los resultados del mercado. Recomendaciones - La discusión y el modelo permiten destacar los principales impulsores de las decisiones de compra de los consumidores y evaluar cómo reaccionan ante el comportamiento manipulador de las empresas en el mercado. Es probable que los agentes que persiguen ganancias a corto plazo a través de prácticas de mercado desleales sean castigados cuando los agentes engañados hagan correr la voz sobre las malas prácticas a las que supuestamente estaban sujetos. Limitaciones / implicaciones de la investigación - Los mercados son entidades complejas, en las que un gran número de agentes individuales suelen establecer contacto local y directo entre sí. Estos agentes difieren en muchos aspectos e interactúan de formas impredecibles. Montar un modelo conciso capaz de abordar tal complejidad es una tarea difícil. El marco propuesto en este documento apunta en la dirección prevista. Originalidad / valor - El debate en este trabajo contribuye a una mayor percepción de los mecanismos que atribuyen robustez y vitalidad a los mercados.application/pdfInglésengUniversidad ESAN. ESAN EdicionesPEurn:issn:2218-0648https://revistas.esan.edu.pe/index.php/jefas/article/view/75/58Attribution 4.0 Internationalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/MarketsDeceptionMoralityPurchasing decisionsPreferencesRumour spreadingMercadosEngañoMoralidadDecisiones de compraPreferenciasDifusión de rumoreshttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.02.04“Fool me once, ...”: deception, morality and self-regeneration in decentralized marketsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtículoreponame:ESAN-Institucionalinstname:Universidad ESANinstacron:ESANJournal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science3264831224Acceso abiertoTHUMBNAIL48.jpg48.jpgimage/jpeg60687https://repositorio.esan.edu.pe/bitstreams/7e7a5306-00aa-47d7-87d6-80e7678eea57/downloada51df45b73712f0a9a099afe60afae36MD51falseAnonymousREADJEFAS-48-2019-312-326.pdf.jpgJEFAS-48-2019-312-326.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg5747https://repositorio.esan.edu.pe/bitstreams/d325acb6-6570-475d-ad92-899e9a52eb76/downloadc00a4a5674445e5aa14c1130b4e69aa9MD54falseAnonymousREADORIGINALJEFAS-48-2019-312-326.pdfTexto completoapplication/pdf256970https://repositorio.esan.edu.pe/bitstreams/bd4d9907-7d09-4756-a834-b96abc99d000/downloade9386396626984749ca1967eaad3dd5dMD52trueAnonymousREADTEXTJEFAS-48-2019-312-326.pdf.txtJEFAS-48-2019-312-326.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain51876https://repositorio.esan.edu.pe/bitstreams/32d56683-e332-4a11-98b6-a34b3422b353/download9540158af94693892bd2dfd5639596b5MD53falseAnonymousREAD20.500.12640/2569oai:repositorio.esan.edu.pe:20.500.12640/25692025-07-09 09:29:49.46https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Attribution 4.0 Internationalopen.accesshttps://repositorio.esan.edu.peRepositorio Institucional ESANrepositorio@esan.edu.pe
score 13.890096
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).