A Methodological Approach to Compare Ontologies: Proposal and Application for SLAM Ontologies

Descripción del Articulo

Representation of the knowledge related to any domain with flexible and well-defined models, such as ontologies, provides the base to develop efficient and interoperable solutions. Hence, a proliferation of ontologies in many domains is unleashed. It is necessary to define how to compare such ontolo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Cardinale Y., Cornejo-Lupa M.A., Ticona-Herrera R., Barrios-Aranibar D.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación
Repositorio:CONCYTEC-Institucional
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/2459
Enlace del recurso:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2459
https://doi.org/10.1145/3428757.3429091
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:SLAM
Autonomous and Mobile Robots
Ontologies Evaluation
Ontology
http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.12
id CONC_e1798350b1b9f2e819784429ce1b0744
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/2459
network_acronym_str CONC
network_name_str CONCYTEC-Institucional
repository_id_str 4689
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A Methodological Approach to Compare Ontologies: Proposal and Application for SLAM Ontologies
title A Methodological Approach to Compare Ontologies: Proposal and Application for SLAM Ontologies
spellingShingle A Methodological Approach to Compare Ontologies: Proposal and Application for SLAM Ontologies
Cardinale Y.
SLAM
Autonomous and Mobile Robots
Ontologies Evaluation
Ontology
http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.12
title_short A Methodological Approach to Compare Ontologies: Proposal and Application for SLAM Ontologies
title_full A Methodological Approach to Compare Ontologies: Proposal and Application for SLAM Ontologies
title_fullStr A Methodological Approach to Compare Ontologies: Proposal and Application for SLAM Ontologies
title_full_unstemmed A Methodological Approach to Compare Ontologies: Proposal and Application for SLAM Ontologies
title_sort A Methodological Approach to Compare Ontologies: Proposal and Application for SLAM Ontologies
author Cardinale Y.
author_facet Cardinale Y.
Cornejo-Lupa M.A.
Ticona-Herrera R.
Barrios-Aranibar D.
author_role author
author2 Cornejo-Lupa M.A.
Ticona-Herrera R.
Barrios-Aranibar D.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cardinale Y.
Cornejo-Lupa M.A.
Ticona-Herrera R.
Barrios-Aranibar D.
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv SLAM
topic SLAM
Autonomous and Mobile Robots
Ontologies Evaluation
Ontology
http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.12
dc.subject.es_PE.fl_str_mv Autonomous and Mobile Robots
Ontologies Evaluation
Ontology
dc.subject.ocde.none.fl_str_mv http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.12
description Representation of the knowledge related to any domain with flexible and well-defined models, such as ontologies, provides the base to develop efficient and interoperable solutions. Hence, a proliferation of ontologies in many domains is unleashed. It is necessary to define how to compare such ontologies to decide which one is the most suitable for specific needs of users/developers. Since the emerging developing of ontologies, several studies have proposed criteria to evaluate them. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of practical and reproducible guidelines to drive a comparative evaluation of ontologies as a systematic process. In this paper, we propose a methodological process to qualitatively and quantitatively compare ontologies at Lexical, Structural, and Domain Knowledge levels, considering Correctness and Quality perspectives. Since the evaluation methods of our proposal are based in a golden-standard, it can be customized to compare ontologies in any domain. To show the suitability of our proposal, we apply our methodological approach to conduct a comparative study of ontologies in the robotic domain, in particularly for the Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) problem. With this study case, we demonstrate that with this methodological comparative process, we are able to identify the strengths and weaknesses of ontologies, as well as the gaps still needed to fill in the target domain (SLAM for our study case). © 2020 ACM.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05-30T23:13:38Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05-30T23:13:38Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2020
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2459
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1145/3428757.3429091
dc.identifier.scopus.none.fl_str_mv 2-s2.0-85100343315
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2459
https://doi.org/10.1145/3428757.3429091
identifier_str_mv 2-s2.0-85100343315
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv ACM International Conference Proceeding Series
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Association for Computing Machinery
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Association for Computing Machinery
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONCYTEC-Institucional
instname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación
instacron:CONCYTEC
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación
instacron_str CONCYTEC
institution CONCYTEC
reponame_str CONCYTEC-Institucional
collection CONCYTEC-Institucional
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional CONCYTEC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@concytec.gob.pe
_version_ 1839175522995666944
spelling Publicationrp05703600rp06231600rp05702600rp00572600Cardinale Y.Cornejo-Lupa M.A.Ticona-Herrera R.Barrios-Aranibar D.2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2020https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2459https://doi.org/10.1145/3428757.34290912-s2.0-85100343315Representation of the knowledge related to any domain with flexible and well-defined models, such as ontologies, provides the base to develop efficient and interoperable solutions. Hence, a proliferation of ontologies in many domains is unleashed. It is necessary to define how to compare such ontologies to decide which one is the most suitable for specific needs of users/developers. Since the emerging developing of ontologies, several studies have proposed criteria to evaluate them. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of practical and reproducible guidelines to drive a comparative evaluation of ontologies as a systematic process. In this paper, we propose a methodological process to qualitatively and quantitatively compare ontologies at Lexical, Structural, and Domain Knowledge levels, considering Correctness and Quality perspectives. Since the evaluation methods of our proposal are based in a golden-standard, it can be customized to compare ontologies in any domain. To show the suitability of our proposal, we apply our methodological approach to conduct a comparative study of ontologies in the robotic domain, in particularly for the Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) problem. With this study case, we demonstrate that with this methodological comparative process, we are able to identify the strengths and weaknesses of ontologies, as well as the gaps still needed to fill in the target domain (SLAM for our study case). © 2020 ACM.Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica - ConcytecengAssociation for Computing MachineryACM International Conference Proceeding Seriesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSLAMAutonomous and Mobile Robots-1Ontologies Evaluation-1Ontology-1http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.12-1A Methodological Approach to Compare Ontologies: Proposal and Application for SLAM Ontologiesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlereponame:CONCYTEC-Institucionalinstname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovacióninstacron:CONCYTEC20.500.12390/2459oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/24592024-05-30 16:08:24.721http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessmetadata only accesshttps://repositorio.concytec.gob.peRepositorio Institucional CONCYTECrepositorio@concytec.gob.pe#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="483161bc-c1c4-47b7-a582-95d853660077"> <Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type> <Language>eng</Language> <Title>A Methodological Approach to Compare Ontologies: Proposal and Application for SLAM Ontologies</Title> <PublishedIn> <Publication> <Title>ACM International Conference Proceeding Series</Title> </Publication> </PublishedIn> <PublicationDate>2020</PublicationDate> <DOI>https://doi.org/10.1145/3428757.3429091</DOI> <SCP-Number>2-s2.0-85100343315</SCP-Number> <Authors> <Author> <DisplayName>Cardinale Y.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp05703" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Cornejo-Lupa M.A.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp06231" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Ticona-Herrera R.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp05702" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Barrios-Aranibar D.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp00572" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> </Authors> <Editors> </Editors> <Publishers> <Publisher> <DisplayName>Association for Computing Machinery</DisplayName> <OrgUnit /> </Publisher> </Publishers> <Keyword>SLAM</Keyword> <Keyword>Autonomous and Mobile Robots</Keyword> <Keyword>Ontologies Evaluation</Keyword> <Keyword>Ontology</Keyword> <Abstract>Representation of the knowledge related to any domain with flexible and well-defined models, such as ontologies, provides the base to develop efficient and interoperable solutions. Hence, a proliferation of ontologies in many domains is unleashed. It is necessary to define how to compare such ontologies to decide which one is the most suitable for specific needs of users/developers. Since the emerging developing of ontologies, several studies have proposed criteria to evaluate them. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of practical and reproducible guidelines to drive a comparative evaluation of ontologies as a systematic process. In this paper, we propose a methodological process to qualitatively and quantitatively compare ontologies at Lexical, Structural, and Domain Knowledge levels, considering Correctness and Quality perspectives. Since the evaluation methods of our proposal are based in a golden-standard, it can be customized to compare ontologies in any domain. To show the suitability of our proposal, we apply our methodological approach to conduct a comparative study of ontologies in the robotic domain, in particularly for the Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) problem. With this study case, we demonstrate that with this methodological comparative process, we are able to identify the strengths and weaknesses of ontologies, as well as the gaps still needed to fill in the target domain (SLAM for our study case). © 2020 ACM.</Abstract> <Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" > </Access> </Publication> -1
score 13.451642
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).