A Methodological Approach to Compare Ontologies: Proposal and Application for SLAM Ontologies
Descripción del Articulo
Representation of the knowledge related to any domain with flexible and well-defined models, such as ontologies, provides the base to develop efficient and interoperable solutions. Hence, a proliferation of ontologies in many domains is unleashed. It is necessary to define how to compare such ontolo...
Autores: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2020 |
Institución: | Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación |
Repositorio: | CONCYTEC-Institucional |
Lenguaje: | inglés |
OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/2459 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2459 https://doi.org/10.1145/3428757.3429091 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | SLAM Autonomous and Mobile Robots Ontologies Evaluation Ontology http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.12 |
id |
CONC_e1798350b1b9f2e819784429ce1b0744 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/2459 |
network_acronym_str |
CONC |
network_name_str |
CONCYTEC-Institucional |
repository_id_str |
4689 |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A Methodological Approach to Compare Ontologies: Proposal and Application for SLAM Ontologies |
title |
A Methodological Approach to Compare Ontologies: Proposal and Application for SLAM Ontologies |
spellingShingle |
A Methodological Approach to Compare Ontologies: Proposal and Application for SLAM Ontologies Cardinale Y. SLAM Autonomous and Mobile Robots Ontologies Evaluation Ontology http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.12 |
title_short |
A Methodological Approach to Compare Ontologies: Proposal and Application for SLAM Ontologies |
title_full |
A Methodological Approach to Compare Ontologies: Proposal and Application for SLAM Ontologies |
title_fullStr |
A Methodological Approach to Compare Ontologies: Proposal and Application for SLAM Ontologies |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Methodological Approach to Compare Ontologies: Proposal and Application for SLAM Ontologies |
title_sort |
A Methodological Approach to Compare Ontologies: Proposal and Application for SLAM Ontologies |
author |
Cardinale Y. |
author_facet |
Cardinale Y. Cornejo-Lupa M.A. Ticona-Herrera R. Barrios-Aranibar D. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cornejo-Lupa M.A. Ticona-Herrera R. Barrios-Aranibar D. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cardinale Y. Cornejo-Lupa M.A. Ticona-Herrera R. Barrios-Aranibar D. |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
SLAM |
topic |
SLAM Autonomous and Mobile Robots Ontologies Evaluation Ontology http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.12 |
dc.subject.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Autonomous and Mobile Robots Ontologies Evaluation Ontology |
dc.subject.ocde.none.fl_str_mv |
http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.12 |
description |
Representation of the knowledge related to any domain with flexible and well-defined models, such as ontologies, provides the base to develop efficient and interoperable solutions. Hence, a proliferation of ontologies in many domains is unleashed. It is necessary to define how to compare such ontologies to decide which one is the most suitable for specific needs of users/developers. Since the emerging developing of ontologies, several studies have proposed criteria to evaluate them. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of practical and reproducible guidelines to drive a comparative evaluation of ontologies as a systematic process. In this paper, we propose a methodological process to qualitatively and quantitatively compare ontologies at Lexical, Structural, and Domain Knowledge levels, considering Correctness and Quality perspectives. Since the evaluation methods of our proposal are based in a golden-standard, it can be customized to compare ontologies in any domain. To show the suitability of our proposal, we apply our methodological approach to conduct a comparative study of ontologies in the robotic domain, in particularly for the Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) problem. With this study case, we demonstrate that with this methodological comparative process, we are able to identify the strengths and weaknesses of ontologies, as well as the gaps still needed to fill in the target domain (SLAM for our study case). © 2020 ACM. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-05-30T23:13:38Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-05-30T23:13:38Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2020 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2459 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1145/3428757.3429091 |
dc.identifier.scopus.none.fl_str_mv |
2-s2.0-85100343315 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2459 https://doi.org/10.1145/3428757.3429091 |
identifier_str_mv |
2-s2.0-85100343315 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv |
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Association for Computing Machinery |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Association for Computing Machinery |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONCYTEC-Institucional instname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación instacron:CONCYTEC |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación |
instacron_str |
CONCYTEC |
institution |
CONCYTEC |
reponame_str |
CONCYTEC-Institucional |
collection |
CONCYTEC-Institucional |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional CONCYTEC |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@concytec.gob.pe |
_version_ |
1839175522995666944 |
spelling |
Publicationrp05703600rp06231600rp05702600rp00572600Cardinale Y.Cornejo-Lupa M.A.Ticona-Herrera R.Barrios-Aranibar D.2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2020https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2459https://doi.org/10.1145/3428757.34290912-s2.0-85100343315Representation of the knowledge related to any domain with flexible and well-defined models, such as ontologies, provides the base to develop efficient and interoperable solutions. Hence, a proliferation of ontologies in many domains is unleashed. It is necessary to define how to compare such ontologies to decide which one is the most suitable for specific needs of users/developers. Since the emerging developing of ontologies, several studies have proposed criteria to evaluate them. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of practical and reproducible guidelines to drive a comparative evaluation of ontologies as a systematic process. In this paper, we propose a methodological process to qualitatively and quantitatively compare ontologies at Lexical, Structural, and Domain Knowledge levels, considering Correctness and Quality perspectives. Since the evaluation methods of our proposal are based in a golden-standard, it can be customized to compare ontologies in any domain. To show the suitability of our proposal, we apply our methodological approach to conduct a comparative study of ontologies in the robotic domain, in particularly for the Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) problem. With this study case, we demonstrate that with this methodological comparative process, we are able to identify the strengths and weaknesses of ontologies, as well as the gaps still needed to fill in the target domain (SLAM for our study case). © 2020 ACM.Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica - ConcytecengAssociation for Computing MachineryACM International Conference Proceeding Seriesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSLAMAutonomous and Mobile Robots-1Ontologies Evaluation-1Ontology-1http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.03.12-1A Methodological Approach to Compare Ontologies: Proposal and Application for SLAM Ontologiesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlereponame:CONCYTEC-Institucionalinstname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovacióninstacron:CONCYTEC20.500.12390/2459oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/24592024-05-30 16:08:24.721http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessmetadata only accesshttps://repositorio.concytec.gob.peRepositorio Institucional CONCYTECrepositorio@concytec.gob.pe#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="483161bc-c1c4-47b7-a582-95d853660077"> <Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type> <Language>eng</Language> <Title>A Methodological Approach to Compare Ontologies: Proposal and Application for SLAM Ontologies</Title> <PublishedIn> <Publication> <Title>ACM International Conference Proceeding Series</Title> </Publication> </PublishedIn> <PublicationDate>2020</PublicationDate> <DOI>https://doi.org/10.1145/3428757.3429091</DOI> <SCP-Number>2-s2.0-85100343315</SCP-Number> <Authors> <Author> <DisplayName>Cardinale Y.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp05703" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Cornejo-Lupa M.A.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp06231" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Ticona-Herrera R.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp05702" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Barrios-Aranibar D.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp00572" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> </Authors> <Editors> </Editors> <Publishers> <Publisher> <DisplayName>Association for Computing Machinery</DisplayName> <OrgUnit /> </Publisher> </Publishers> <Keyword>SLAM</Keyword> <Keyword>Autonomous and Mobile Robots</Keyword> <Keyword>Ontologies Evaluation</Keyword> <Keyword>Ontology</Keyword> <Abstract>Representation of the knowledge related to any domain with flexible and well-defined models, such as ontologies, provides the base to develop efficient and interoperable solutions. Hence, a proliferation of ontologies in many domains is unleashed. It is necessary to define how to compare such ontologies to decide which one is the most suitable for specific needs of users/developers. Since the emerging developing of ontologies, several studies have proposed criteria to evaluate them. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of practical and reproducible guidelines to drive a comparative evaluation of ontologies as a systematic process. In this paper, we propose a methodological process to qualitatively and quantitatively compare ontologies at Lexical, Structural, and Domain Knowledge levels, considering Correctness and Quality perspectives. Since the evaluation methods of our proposal are based in a golden-standard, it can be customized to compare ontologies in any domain. To show the suitability of our proposal, we apply our methodological approach to conduct a comparative study of ontologies in the robotic domain, in particularly for the Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) problem. With this study case, we demonstrate that with this methodological comparative process, we are able to identify the strengths and weaknesses of ontologies, as well as the gaps still needed to fill in the target domain (SLAM for our study case). © 2020 ACM.</Abstract> <Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" > </Access> </Publication> -1 |
score |
13.451642 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).