Ultraviolet Concentration Factor of a Truncated Compound Parabolic Concentrator under Different Weather Conditions

Descripción del Articulo

Abstract—: This study presents the results of ultraviolet radiation measurement in a truncated compound parabolic concentrator. The measurements were performed by using of a portable ultraviolet sensor both inside and outside the concentrator without the presence of receiver, under direct and diffus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Saettone E., Paredes F., Quino J., Ponce S., Eyzaguirre R.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2020
Institución:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación
Repositorio:CONCYTEC-Institucional
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/2569
Enlace del recurso:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2569
https://doi.org/10.3103/S0003701X20020103
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:ultraviolet radiation
photocatalytic reactor
solar concentrators
solar energy
truncated compound parabolic concentrator
http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.02.04
Descripción
Sumario:Abstract—: This study presents the results of ultraviolet radiation measurement in a truncated compound parabolic concentrator. The measurements were performed by using of a portable ultraviolet sensor both inside and outside the concentrator without the presence of receiver, under direct and diffuse solar radiation, to calculate the real value of the concentration factor of ultraviolet radiation. The truncated compound parabolic concentrator was designed in Solid Works and built via 3D printing, with a theoretical concentration factor of 4.6. This study showed the differences in the form of the ultraviolet radiation when measurements were made under direct radiation and diffuse solar radiation. These differences are important when measurements were made along the concentrator profile, at different heights within the concentrator and, also, along it. Finally, a concentration factor of 3.3 and 1.4 were calculated on a sunny and a cloudy days, respectively. These values correspond to a concentration efficiency of 71.7 and 31.3%, respectively, against the theoretical value of 4.6 proposed in the design. © 2020, Allerton Press, Inc.
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).