Comparison of Methodologies: Analytical Hierarchy Process and Grey Clustering with Entropy Weight for the Multicriteria Assessment of the Energy Sources of Perú
Descripción del Articulo
This work was supported by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica (CONCYTEC) y el Fondo Nacional De Desarrollo Científico, Tecnológico Y De Innovación Tecnológica (FONDECYT)
Autor: | |
---|---|
Formato: | objeto de conferencia |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2018 |
Institución: | Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación |
Repositorio: | CONCYTEC-Institucional |
Lenguaje: | inglés |
OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/543 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/543 https://doi.org/10.1109/TDC-LA.2018.8511700 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Weighted method Carbon Fuels Hydrocarbons Uranium Water waves Analytical Hierarchy Process Decision making methodology Energy planning Grey clustering Liquid hydrocarbons Multi-criteria assessment Shannon entropy Decision making https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.04.000 |
id |
CONC_a8a6f5114945da8120583eac70eb16f2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/543 |
network_acronym_str |
CONC |
network_name_str |
CONCYTEC-Institucional |
repository_id_str |
4689 |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of Methodologies: Analytical Hierarchy Process and Grey Clustering with Entropy Weight for the Multicriteria Assessment of the Energy Sources of Perú |
title |
Comparison of Methodologies: Analytical Hierarchy Process and Grey Clustering with Entropy Weight for the Multicriteria Assessment of the Energy Sources of Perú |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of Methodologies: Analytical Hierarchy Process and Grey Clustering with Entropy Weight for the Multicriteria Assessment of the Energy Sources of Perú Sacasqui M. Weighted method Carbon Fuels Hydrocarbons Uranium Water waves Analytical Hierarchy Process Decision making methodology Energy planning Grey clustering Liquid hydrocarbons Multi-criteria assessment Shannon entropy Decision making https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.04.000 |
title_short |
Comparison of Methodologies: Analytical Hierarchy Process and Grey Clustering with Entropy Weight for the Multicriteria Assessment of the Energy Sources of Perú |
title_full |
Comparison of Methodologies: Analytical Hierarchy Process and Grey Clustering with Entropy Weight for the Multicriteria Assessment of the Energy Sources of Perú |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of Methodologies: Analytical Hierarchy Process and Grey Clustering with Entropy Weight for the Multicriteria Assessment of the Energy Sources of Perú |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of Methodologies: Analytical Hierarchy Process and Grey Clustering with Entropy Weight for the Multicriteria Assessment of the Energy Sources of Perú |
title_sort |
Comparison of Methodologies: Analytical Hierarchy Process and Grey Clustering with Entropy Weight for the Multicriteria Assessment of the Energy Sources of Perú |
author |
Sacasqui M. |
author_facet |
Sacasqui M. |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sacasqui M. |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Weighted method |
topic |
Weighted method Carbon Fuels Hydrocarbons Uranium Water waves Analytical Hierarchy Process Decision making methodology Energy planning Grey clustering Liquid hydrocarbons Multi-criteria assessment Shannon entropy Decision making https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.04.000 |
dc.subject.es_PE.fl_str_mv |
Carbon Fuels Hydrocarbons Uranium Water waves Analytical Hierarchy Process Decision making methodology Energy planning Grey clustering Liquid hydrocarbons Multi-criteria assessment Shannon entropy Decision making |
dc.subject.ocde.none.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.04.000 |
description |
This work was supported by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica (CONCYTEC) y el Fondo Nacional De Desarrollo Científico, Tecnológico Y De Innovación Tecnológica (FONDECYT) |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-05-30T23:13:38Z |
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-05-30T23:13:38Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject |
format |
conferenceObject |
dc.identifier.isbn.none.fl_str_mv |
urn:isbn:9781538658444 |
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/543 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1109/TDC-LA.2018.8511700 |
dc.identifier.scopus.none.fl_str_mv |
2-s2.0-85057036717 |
identifier_str_mv |
urn:isbn:9781538658444 2-s2.0-85057036717 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/543 https://doi.org/10.1109/TDC-LA.2018.8511700 |
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv |
Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exhibition - Latin America, T and D-LA 2018 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONCYTEC-Institucional instname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación instacron:CONCYTEC |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación |
instacron_str |
CONCYTEC |
institution |
CONCYTEC |
reponame_str |
CONCYTEC-Institucional |
collection |
CONCYTEC-Institucional |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositorio Institucional CONCYTEC |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@concytec.gob.pe |
_version_ |
1839175660605538304 |
spelling |
Publicationrp00912500Sacasqui M.2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2018urn:isbn:9781538658444https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/543https://doi.org/10.1109/TDC-LA.2018.85117002-s2.0-85057036717This work was supported by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica (CONCYTEC) y el Fondo Nacional De Desarrollo Científico, Tecnológico Y De Innovación Tecnológica (FONDECYT)This article introduces a comparison among decision making methodologies applied to energetic policies. Every country has a challenge that is choice the most suitable energetic source in order to the common welfare, it is the reason for use decision making supported by structured methods that can be Analytical Hierarchic Process, Grey Clustering with Entropy Weight (both used in this research) or another. The result shows the differences and similarities due each methodology and for the same case analyzed also the Peruvian energetic sources were qualified. According both methodologies, the most important sources are: hydraulic, natural gas and fuel (saving order). The important sources are: or solar, geothermic, biomass, eolic or geothermic, solar, biomass, eolic (respectively for each method). The less important are: or liquid hydrocarbons, carbon, bio-fuels, sea-wave, tidal, uranium or liquid hydrocarbons, carbon, bio-fuels, uranium, tidal, sea-wave (respectively for each method). Finally this research could be used for improve the decision making in energetic policy topics trough the new method Grey Clustering with Entropy Weight.Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica - ConcytecengInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exhibition - Latin America, T and D-LA 2018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessWeighted methodCarbon-1Fuels-1Hydrocarbons-1Uranium-1Water waves-1Analytical Hierarchy Process-1Decision making methodology-1Energy planning-1Grey clustering-1Liquid hydrocarbons-1Multi-criteria assessment-1Shannon entropy-1Decision making-1https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.04.000-1Comparison of Methodologies: Analytical Hierarchy Process and Grey Clustering with Entropy Weight for the Multicriteria Assessment of the Energy Sources of Perúinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectreponame:CONCYTEC-Institucionalinstname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovacióninstacron:CONCYTEC#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#20.500.12390/543oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/5432024-05-30 15:44:14.128http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessmetadata only accesshttps://repositorio.concytec.gob.peRepositorio Institucional CONCYTECrepositorio@concytec.gob.pe#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="95cbf872-63ac-4814-bd24-dfa7a532c8f1"> <Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type> <Language>eng</Language> <Title>Comparison of Methodologies: Analytical Hierarchy Process and Grey Clustering with Entropy Weight for the Multicriteria Assessment of the Energy Sources of Perú</Title> <PublishedIn> <Publication> <Title>Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exhibition - Latin America, T and D-LA 2018</Title> </Publication> </PublishedIn> <PublicationDate>2018</PublicationDate> <DOI>https://doi.org/10.1109/TDC-LA.2018.8511700</DOI> <SCP-Number>2-s2.0-85057036717</SCP-Number> <ISBN>urn:isbn:9781538658444</ISBN> <Authors> <Author> <DisplayName>Sacasqui M.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp00912" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> </Authors> <Editors> </Editors> <Publishers> <Publisher> <DisplayName>Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.</DisplayName> <OrgUnit /> </Publisher> </Publishers> <Keyword>Weighted method</Keyword> <Keyword>Carbon</Keyword> <Keyword>Fuels</Keyword> <Keyword>Hydrocarbons</Keyword> <Keyword>Uranium</Keyword> <Keyword>Water waves</Keyword> <Keyword>Analytical Hierarchy Process</Keyword> <Keyword>Decision making methodology</Keyword> <Keyword>Energy planning</Keyword> <Keyword>Grey clustering</Keyword> <Keyword>Liquid hydrocarbons</Keyword> <Keyword>Multi-criteria assessment</Keyword> <Keyword>Shannon entropy</Keyword> <Keyword>Decision making</Keyword> <Abstract>This article introduces a comparison among decision making methodologies applied to energetic policies. Every country has a challenge that is choice the most suitable energetic source in order to the common welfare, it is the reason for use decision making supported by structured methods that can be Analytical Hierarchic Process, Grey Clustering with Entropy Weight (both used in this research) or another. The result shows the differences and similarities due each methodology and for the same case analyzed also the Peruvian energetic sources were qualified. According both methodologies, the most important sources are: hydraulic, natural gas and fuel (saving order). The important sources are: or solar, geothermic, biomass, eolic or geothermic, solar, biomass, eolic (respectively for each method). The less important are: or liquid hydrocarbons, carbon, bio-fuels, sea-wave, tidal, uranium or liquid hydrocarbons, carbon, bio-fuels, uranium, tidal, sea-wave (respectively for each method). Finally this research could be used for improve the decision making in energetic policy topics trough the new method Grey Clustering with Entropy Weight.</Abstract> <Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" > </Access> </Publication> -1 |
score |
13.461024 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).