Application of a methodological approach to compare ontologies

Descripción del Articulo

The research has received funding from FONDO NACIONAL DE DESARROLLO CIENTÍFICO, TECNOLÓGICO Y DE INNOVACIÓN TECNOLÓGICA - FONDECYT as executing entity of CONCYTEC under grant agreement no. 01–2019-FONDECYT-BM-INC.INV in the project RUTAS: Robots for Urban Tourism, Autonomous and Semantic Web-based....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Cardinale Y., Cornejo-Lupa M.A., Pinto-De la Gala A., Ticona-Herrera R.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2021
Institución:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación
Repositorio:CONCYTEC-Institucional
Lenguaje:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/2972
Enlace del recurso:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2972
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-03-2021-0036
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:SLAM
Cultural heritage
Evaluation of ontologies
Ontologies
Semantic web
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.05.01
id CONC_8dcb4a85eb50986782ced3f61455eb7a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/2972
network_acronym_str CONC
network_name_str CONCYTEC-Institucional
repository_id_str 4689
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Application of a methodological approach to compare ontologies
title Application of a methodological approach to compare ontologies
spellingShingle Application of a methodological approach to compare ontologies
Cardinale Y.
SLAM
Cultural heritage
Evaluation of ontologies
Ontologies
Semantic web
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.05.01
title_short Application of a methodological approach to compare ontologies
title_full Application of a methodological approach to compare ontologies
title_fullStr Application of a methodological approach to compare ontologies
title_full_unstemmed Application of a methodological approach to compare ontologies
title_sort Application of a methodological approach to compare ontologies
author Cardinale Y.
author_facet Cardinale Y.
Cornejo-Lupa M.A.
Pinto-De la Gala A.
Ticona-Herrera R.
author_role author
author2 Cornejo-Lupa M.A.
Pinto-De la Gala A.
Ticona-Herrera R.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cardinale Y.
Cornejo-Lupa M.A.
Pinto-De la Gala A.
Ticona-Herrera R.
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv SLAM
topic SLAM
Cultural heritage
Evaluation of ontologies
Ontologies
Semantic web
https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.05.01
dc.subject.es_PE.fl_str_mv Cultural heritage
Evaluation of ontologies
Ontologies
Semantic web
dc.subject.ocde.none.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.05.01
description The research has received funding from FONDO NACIONAL DE DESARROLLO CIENTÍFICO, TECNOLÓGICO Y DE INNOVACIÓN TECNOLÓGICA - FONDECYT as executing entity of CONCYTEC under grant agreement no. 01–2019-FONDECYT-BM-INC.INV in the project RUTAS: Robots for Urban Tourism, Autonomous and Semantic Web-based.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.accessioned.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05-30T23:13:38Z
dc.date.available.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05-30T23:13:38Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2021
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.uri.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2972
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-03-2021-0036
dc.identifier.scopus.none.fl_str_mv 2-s2.0-85113781459
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2972
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-03-2021-0036
identifier_str_mv 2-s2.0-85113781459
dc.language.iso.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Web Information Systems
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONCYTEC-Institucional
instname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación
instacron:CONCYTEC
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación
instacron_str CONCYTEC
institution CONCYTEC
reponame_str CONCYTEC-Institucional
collection CONCYTEC-Institucional
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional CONCYTEC
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio@concytec.gob.pe
_version_ 1844883032057577472
spelling Publicationrp05703600rp06231600rp08424600rp05702600Cardinale Y.Cornejo-Lupa M.A.Pinto-De la Gala A.Ticona-Herrera R.2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2024-05-30T23:13:38Z2021https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12390/2972https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-03-2021-00362-s2.0-85113781459The research has received funding from FONDO NACIONAL DE DESARROLLO CIENTÍFICO, TECNOLÓGICO Y DE INNOVACIÓN TECNOLÓGICA - FONDECYT as executing entity of CONCYTEC under grant agreement no. 01–2019-FONDECYT-BM-INC.INV in the project RUTAS: Robots for Urban Tourism, Autonomous and Semantic Web-based.Purpose: This study aims to the OQuaRE quality model to the developed methodology. Design/methodology/approach: Ontologies are formal, well-defined and flexible representations of knowledge related to a specific domain. They provide the base to develop efficient and interoperable solutions. Hence, a proliferation of ontologies in many domains is unleashed. Then, it is necessary to define how to compare such ontologies to decide which one is the most suitable for the specific needs of users/developers. As the emerging development of ontologies, several studies have proposed criteria to evaluate them. Findings: In a previous study, the authors propose a methodological process to qualitatively and quantitatively compare ontologies at Lexical, Structural and Domain Knowledge levels, considering correctness and quality perspectives. As the evaluation methods of the proposal are based on a golden-standard, it can be customized to compare ontologies in any domain. Practical implications: To show the suitability of the proposal, the authors apply the methodological approach to conduct comparative studies of ontologies in two different domains, one in the robotic area, in particular for the simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) problem; and the other one, in the cultural heritage domain. With these cases of study, the authors demonstrate that with this methodological comparative process, we are able to identify the strengths and weaknesses of ontologies, as well as the gaps still needed to fill in the target domains. Originality/value: Using these metrics and the quality model from OQuaRE, the authors are incorporating a standard of software engineering at the quality validation into the Semantic Web. © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited.Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica - ConcytecengEmerald Group Holdings Ltd.International Journal of Web Information Systemsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSLAMCultural heritage-1Evaluation of ontologies-1Ontologies-1Semantic web-1https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.05.01-1Application of a methodological approach to compare ontologiesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlereponame:CONCYTEC-Institucionalinstname:Consejo Nacional de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovacióninstacron:CONCYTEC20.500.12390/2972oai:repositorio.concytec.gob.pe:20.500.12390/29722024-05-30 16:12:41.144http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cbinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessmetadata only accesshttps://repositorio.concytec.gob.peRepositorio Institucional CONCYTECrepositorio@concytec.gob.pe#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="ce292727-7f0f-4789-8e6a-15cb30c842b5"> <Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type> <Language>eng</Language> <Title>Application of a methodological approach to compare ontologies</Title> <PublishedIn> <Publication> <Title>International Journal of Web Information Systems</Title> </Publication> </PublishedIn> <PublicationDate>2021</PublicationDate> <DOI>https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-03-2021-0036</DOI> <SCP-Number>2-s2.0-85113781459</SCP-Number> <Authors> <Author> <DisplayName>Cardinale Y.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp05703" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Cornejo-Lupa M.A.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp06231" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Pinto-De la Gala A.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp08424" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> <Author> <DisplayName>Ticona-Herrera R.</DisplayName> <Person id="rp05702" /> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> </Authors> <Editors> </Editors> <Publishers> <Publisher> <DisplayName>Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.</DisplayName> <OrgUnit /> </Publisher> </Publishers> <Keyword>SLAM</Keyword> <Keyword>Cultural heritage</Keyword> <Keyword>Evaluation of ontologies</Keyword> <Keyword>Ontologies</Keyword> <Keyword>Semantic web</Keyword> <Abstract>Purpose: This study aims to the OQuaRE quality model to the developed methodology. Design/methodology/approach: Ontologies are formal, well-defined and flexible representations of knowledge related to a specific domain. They provide the base to develop efficient and interoperable solutions. Hence, a proliferation of ontologies in many domains is unleashed. Then, it is necessary to define how to compare such ontologies to decide which one is the most suitable for the specific needs of users/developers. As the emerging development of ontologies, several studies have proposed criteria to evaluate them. Findings: In a previous study, the authors propose a methodological process to qualitatively and quantitatively compare ontologies at Lexical, Structural and Domain Knowledge levels, considering correctness and quality perspectives. As the evaluation methods of the proposal are based on a golden-standard, it can be customized to compare ontologies in any domain. Practical implications: To show the suitability of the proposal, the authors apply the methodological approach to conduct comparative studies of ontologies in two different domains, one in the robotic area, in particular for the simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) problem; and the other one, in the cultural heritage domain. With these cases of study, the authors demonstrate that with this methodological comparative process, we are able to identify the strengths and weaknesses of ontologies, as well as the gaps still needed to fill in the target domains. Originality/value: Using these metrics and the quality model from OQuaRE, the authors are incorporating a standard of software engineering at the quality validation into the Semantic Web. © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited.</Abstract> <Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" > </Access> </Publication> -1
score 13.465682
Application of a methodological approach to compare ontologies
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).

Ejemplares Similares