What happens to pretrial detention after the rejection of the initiation of summary proceedings? A reconstruction of the debate
Descripción del Articulo
This article analyzes the legal effects of pretrial detention following the rejection of a request to initiate summary proceedings. To this end, using a Genovese realism approach, we have reconstructed the dogmatic and judicial discourse on the matter. The aim is to show that, despite being a discus...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2025 |
| Institución: | Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| Repositorio: | CAL-Chornancap |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/155 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/155 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Prisión preventiva Proceso inmediato Código interpretativo Reglas de traducción Metareglas Pretrial Detention Expedited Proceedings Interpretive Code Translation Rules Meta-Rules |
| id |
CAL-RChorn_cc67e29e333460499acf2f938a0f4eab |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/155 |
| network_acronym_str |
CAL-RChorn |
| network_name_str |
CAL-Chornancap |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
What happens to pretrial detention after the rejection of the initiation of summary proceedings? A reconstruction of the debate¿Qué ocurre con la prisión preventiva tras el rechazo de la incoación al proceso inmediato? Una reconstrucción del debateMartínez Reaño, Roberto JavierPrisión preventivaProceso inmediatoCódigo interpretativoReglas de traducciónMetareglasPretrial DetentionExpedited ProceedingsInterpretive CodeTranslation RulesMeta-RulesThis article analyzes the legal effects of pretrial detention following the rejection of a request to initiate summary proceedings. To this end, using a Genovese realism approach, we have reconstructed the dogmatic and judicial discourse on the matter. The aim is to show that, despite being a discussion from 2016, the issue remains relevant due to legislative changes and understandings on the matter. The analysis of the discourse of five dogmatic positions on the subject and the analysis of three judicial resolutions and Extraordinary Plenary Agreement 2-2016 were used. The criteria used to select these documents were that they directly address the issue at hand and are relevant to the legal system. Texts that deal exclusively with pretrial detention or summary proceedings were discarded. After the conceptual reconstruction, the dogmatic commitments and interpretive codes used by jurists and legal practitioners were highlighted, as well as the evaluation of the internal coherence and external resistance of the arguments.El presente artículo analiza el tema de los efectos jurídicos sobre el requerimiento de prisión preventiva tras el rechazo del requerimiento de incoación al proceso inmediato. Para ello, empleando un enfoque del realismo genovés, se ha realizado una reconstrucción del discurso dogmático y del discurso judicial que se han pronunciado sobre el asunto. Con esto, se busca evidenciar que, pese a que es una discusión del 2016, el tema sigue siendo relevante por los cambios legislativos y entendimientos sobre la materia. Se empleó el análisis del discurso de cinco posiciones dogmáticas sobre el tema y el análisis de tres resoluciones judiciales y el Acuerdo Plenario Extraordinario 2-2016. Para la selección de estos documentos se ha empleado como criterio que se aborde directamente la cuestión problemática y tengan relevancia en el sistema jurídico. Se descartaron textos que hablen exclusivamente sobre la prisión preventiva o sobre el proceso inmediato. Tras la reconstrucción conceptual, se evidenció los compromisos dogmáticos y los códigos interpretativos empleados por los juristas y operadores del derecho, así como la evaluación de la coherencia interna y resistencia externa de las argumentaciones.Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque2025-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/15510.61542/rjch.155Chornancap Law Review; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Comparative Constitutional Justice; 217–239Chornancap Revista Jurídica; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2025): Justicia Constitucional Comparada; 217–2392961-29342961-292610.61542/rjch.v3i2reponame:CAL-Chornancapinstname:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayequeinstacron:CALspahttps://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/155/163https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/1552025-12-30T21:04:19Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
What happens to pretrial detention after the rejection of the initiation of summary proceedings? A reconstruction of the debate ¿Qué ocurre con la prisión preventiva tras el rechazo de la incoación al proceso inmediato? Una reconstrucción del debate |
| title |
What happens to pretrial detention after the rejection of the initiation of summary proceedings? A reconstruction of the debate |
| spellingShingle |
What happens to pretrial detention after the rejection of the initiation of summary proceedings? A reconstruction of the debate Martínez Reaño, Roberto Javier Prisión preventiva Proceso inmediato Código interpretativo Reglas de traducción Metareglas Pretrial Detention Expedited Proceedings Interpretive Code Translation Rules Meta-Rules |
| title_short |
What happens to pretrial detention after the rejection of the initiation of summary proceedings? A reconstruction of the debate |
| title_full |
What happens to pretrial detention after the rejection of the initiation of summary proceedings? A reconstruction of the debate |
| title_fullStr |
What happens to pretrial detention after the rejection of the initiation of summary proceedings? A reconstruction of the debate |
| title_full_unstemmed |
What happens to pretrial detention after the rejection of the initiation of summary proceedings? A reconstruction of the debate |
| title_sort |
What happens to pretrial detention after the rejection of the initiation of summary proceedings? A reconstruction of the debate |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Martínez Reaño, Roberto Javier |
| author |
Martínez Reaño, Roberto Javier |
| author_facet |
Martínez Reaño, Roberto Javier |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Prisión preventiva Proceso inmediato Código interpretativo Reglas de traducción Metareglas Pretrial Detention Expedited Proceedings Interpretive Code Translation Rules Meta-Rules |
| topic |
Prisión preventiva Proceso inmediato Código interpretativo Reglas de traducción Metareglas Pretrial Detention Expedited Proceedings Interpretive Code Translation Rules Meta-Rules |
| description |
This article analyzes the legal effects of pretrial detention following the rejection of a request to initiate summary proceedings. To this end, using a Genovese realism approach, we have reconstructed the dogmatic and judicial discourse on the matter. The aim is to show that, despite being a discussion from 2016, the issue remains relevant due to legislative changes and understandings on the matter. The analysis of the discourse of five dogmatic positions on the subject and the analysis of three judicial resolutions and Extraordinary Plenary Agreement 2-2016 were used. The criteria used to select these documents were that they directly address the issue at hand and are relevant to the legal system. Texts that deal exclusively with pretrial detention or summary proceedings were discarded. After the conceptual reconstruction, the dogmatic commitments and interpretive codes used by jurists and legal practitioners were highlighted, as well as the evaluation of the internal coherence and external resistance of the arguments. |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-12-30 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/155 10.61542/rjch.155 |
| url |
https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/155 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.61542/rjch.155 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/155/163 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Chornancap Law Review; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Comparative Constitutional Justice; 217–239 Chornancap Revista Jurídica; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2025): Justicia Constitucional Comparada; 217–239 2961-2934 2961-2926 10.61542/rjch.v3i2 reponame:CAL-Chornancap instname:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque instacron:CAL |
| instname_str |
Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| instacron_str |
CAL |
| institution |
CAL |
| reponame_str |
CAL-Chornancap |
| collection |
CAL-Chornancap |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1870083422362271744 |
| score |
13.924476 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
