The The illicitness in the process of extinguishment of ownership
Descripción del Articulo
The article seeks to examine the interpretative scope of the unlawfulness as a sine qua non for the proceeding of the forfeiture of ownership in Peru, based on the current regulation and application that has been taking place in this matter. The unlawfulness is not limited to a criminal unlawfulness...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2024 |
| Institución: | Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| Repositorio: | CAL-Chornancap |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/85 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/85 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Ilicitud Extinción de dominio Derecho Penal Interpretación constitucional Taxatividad Unlawfulness Extinction of ownership Criminal Law Constitutional interpretation Taxativity |
| Sumario: | The article seeks to examine the interpretative scope of the unlawfulness as a sine qua non for the proceeding of the forfeiture of ownership in Peru, based on the current regulation and application that has been taking place in this matter. The unlawfulness is not limited to a criminal unlawfulness, but to any type of unlawfulness: criminal, civil, administrative, tax, etc., which entails an extremely broad unlawfulness. The objective is to determine the viability of this practice and to propose some solutions, considering the constitutional framework and the unrestricted respect for fundamental rights, particularly in the interpretation of the norm for the restriction of rights. A study is carried out focused on the procedural regulation of the extinguishment of ownership and doctrine related to unlawfulness. It is established that the interpretative scope given to unlawfulness is broad, not taking into consideration the restrictive interpretation of fundamental rights, but deliberately broadening it to extinguish the domain of those required, highlighting the constitutional interpretation as a control mechanism against the violation of rights and guaranteeing an adequate application of the norm in the process. |
|---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).