The violation of the principle of minimum intervention of criminal law in relation to the minimum possession of two or more types of drugs
Descripción del Articulo
This article addresses an issue of great relevance regarding the regulation contained in the second paragraph of Article 299 of the Penal Code. This legal provision raises concerns due to its exclusion from the exemption of criminal liability in situations where possession involves two or more types...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2023 |
| Institución: | Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| Repositorio: | CAL-Chornancap |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/17 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/vulneracion_al_principio_de_minima_intervencion |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Materia: | Drogas Garantismo Microcomercialización de drogas Represión penal Drugs Guarantees Micromarketing of drugs Penal repression |
| id |
CAL-RChorn_1707b114ac5aacad6d8adf62c0a90e81 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/17 |
| network_acronym_str |
CAL-RChorn |
| network_name_str |
CAL-Chornancap |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
The violation of the principle of minimum intervention of criminal law in relation to the minimum possession of two or more types of drugsLa vulneración al principio de mínima intervención del Derecho Penal en relación a la posesión mínima de dos o más tipos de drogasTorres Campos, Jhordy MichelDrogasGarantismoMicrocomercialización de drogasRepresión penalDrugsGuaranteesMicromarketing of drugsPenal repressionThis article addresses an issue of great relevance regarding the regulation contained in the second paragraph of Article 299 of the Penal Code. This legal provision raises concerns due to its exclusion from the exemption of criminal liability in situations where possession involves two or more types of drugs. This regulation is problematic in terms of compatibility with the principle of minimal intervention of Criminal Law. In this context, the need to modify the mentioned article is raised, in order to encompass within its notion of non-punishable possession the possession of drugs intended for one's own immediate consumption, regardless of whether it involves one or several types of substances, as long as the stipulated minimum quantities are respected. It is important to emphasize that this modification would not apply in cases where possession serves purposes other than personal consumption. Consequently, this proposal seeks to offer a more coherent and in line with the principle of minimal intervention, while addressing a relevant issue in the penal domain.Este artículo aborda una cuestión de gran relevancia en relación con la regulación contenida en el segundo párrafo del artículo 299 del Código Penal. Esta disposición legal suscita preocupación debido a su exclusión de la exención de responsabilidad penal en situaciones donde la posesión involucra dos o más tipos de drogas. Esta normativa resulta problemática en términos de compatibilidad con el principio de mínima intervención del Derecho Penal. En este contexto, se plantea la necesidad de modificar el artículo mencionado, con el propósito de que abarque en su noción de posesión no punible la tenencia de droga destinada al propio e inmediato consumo, independientemente de si se trata de uno o varios tipos de sustancias, siempre y cuando se respeten las cantidades mínimas estipuladas. Es importante subrayar que esta modificación no sería aplicable en casos donde la posesión tenga propósitos diferentes al consumo personal. En consecuencia, esta propuesta busca ofrecer un marco normativo más coherente y acorde con el principio de mínima intervención, al tiempo que se aborda una problemática relevante en el ámbito penal. Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque2023-10-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/vulneracion_al_principio_de_minima_intervencion10.61542/rjch.17Chornancap Law Review; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Criminal justice, fundamental rights and democratic state; 17-32Chornancap Revista Jurídica; Vol. 1 Núm. 1 (2023): Justicia penal, derechos fundamentales y Estado democrático; 17-322961-29342961-292610.61542/rjch.v1i1reponame:CAL-Chornancapinstname:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayequeinstacron:CALspahttps://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/vulneracion_al_principio_de_minima_intervencion/26https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/172024-08-04T21:33:39Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The violation of the principle of minimum intervention of criminal law in relation to the minimum possession of two or more types of drugs La vulneración al principio de mínima intervención del Derecho Penal en relación a la posesión mínima de dos o más tipos de drogas |
| title |
The violation of the principle of minimum intervention of criminal law in relation to the minimum possession of two or more types of drugs |
| spellingShingle |
The violation of the principle of minimum intervention of criminal law in relation to the minimum possession of two or more types of drugs Torres Campos, Jhordy Michel Drogas Garantismo Microcomercialización de drogas Represión penal Drugs Guarantees Micromarketing of drugs Penal repression |
| title_short |
The violation of the principle of minimum intervention of criminal law in relation to the minimum possession of two or more types of drugs |
| title_full |
The violation of the principle of minimum intervention of criminal law in relation to the minimum possession of two or more types of drugs |
| title_fullStr |
The violation of the principle of minimum intervention of criminal law in relation to the minimum possession of two or more types of drugs |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The violation of the principle of minimum intervention of criminal law in relation to the minimum possession of two or more types of drugs |
| title_sort |
The violation of the principle of minimum intervention of criminal law in relation to the minimum possession of two or more types of drugs |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Torres Campos, Jhordy Michel |
| author |
Torres Campos, Jhordy Michel |
| author_facet |
Torres Campos, Jhordy Michel |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Drogas Garantismo Microcomercialización de drogas Represión penal Drugs Guarantees Micromarketing of drugs Penal repression |
| topic |
Drogas Garantismo Microcomercialización de drogas Represión penal Drugs Guarantees Micromarketing of drugs Penal repression |
| description |
This article addresses an issue of great relevance regarding the regulation contained in the second paragraph of Article 299 of the Penal Code. This legal provision raises concerns due to its exclusion from the exemption of criminal liability in situations where possession involves two or more types of drugs. This regulation is problematic in terms of compatibility with the principle of minimal intervention of Criminal Law. In this context, the need to modify the mentioned article is raised, in order to encompass within its notion of non-punishable possession the possession of drugs intended for one's own immediate consumption, regardless of whether it involves one or several types of substances, as long as the stipulated minimum quantities are respected. It is important to emphasize that this modification would not apply in cases where possession serves purposes other than personal consumption. Consequently, this proposal seeks to offer a more coherent and in line with the principle of minimal intervention, while addressing a relevant issue in the penal domain. |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10-17 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/vulneracion_al_principio_de_minima_intervencion 10.61542/rjch.17 |
| url |
https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/vulneracion_al_principio_de_minima_intervencion |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.61542/rjch.17 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/vulneracion_al_principio_de_minima_intervencion/26 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Chornancap Law Review; Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Criminal justice, fundamental rights and democratic state; 17-32 Chornancap Revista Jurídica; Vol. 1 Núm. 1 (2023): Justicia penal, derechos fundamentales y Estado democrático; 17-32 2961-2934 2961-2926 10.61542/rjch.v1i1 reponame:CAL-Chornancap instname:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque instacron:CAL |
| instname_str |
Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque |
| instacron_str |
CAL |
| institution |
CAL |
| reponame_str |
CAL-Chornancap |
| collection |
CAL-Chornancap |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1870083420775776256 |
| score |
13.922664 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).