¿Constitutional jurisdiction in Cuba? : A necessary approach

Descripción del Articulo

This article analyses the existence of a constitutional jurisdiction in Cuba, based on the 2019 Constitution of the Republic of Cuba and its implementing regulations. It aims to identify the main characteristics of this constitutional jurisdiction, focusing on the regulation of the Cuban constitutio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Mondelo Tamayo, Jorge Olver, Mustelier Giro, Adriano
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2025
Institución:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
Repositorio:CAL-Chornancap
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/168
Enlace del recurso:https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/168
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Jurisdicción constitucional
Jurisdicción ordinaria
Cuba
Amparo
Tribunales de justicia
Constitutional jurisdiction
ordinary jurisdiction
courts of justice
id CAL-RChorn_1427d9efdc8f9a8f45ee732a108f822f
oai_identifier_str oai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/168
network_acronym_str CAL-RChorn
network_name_str CAL-Chornancap
repository_id_str
spelling ¿Constitutional jurisdiction in Cuba? : A necessary approach¿Jurisdicción constitucional en Cuba? Una aproximación necesariaMondelo Tamayo, Jorge OlverMustelier Giro, AdrianoJurisdicción constitucionalJurisdicción ordinariaCubaAmparoTribunales de justiciaConstitutional jurisdictionordinary jurisdictionCubaAmparocourts of justiceThis article analyses the existence of a constitutional jurisdiction in Cuba, based on the 2019 Constitution of the Republic of Cuba and its implementing regulations. It aims to identify the main characteristics of this constitutional jurisdiction, focusing on the regulation of the Cuban constitutional amparo, and to assess its conception as a guarantee for the protection of constitutional rights. This is a qualitative investigation that employed the theoretical methods of analysis-synthesis, inductive-deductive, and the historical method. Specific methods for legal research, such as the comparative legal and legal exegetical methods, were applied. The most up-to-date literature on the subject was reviewed. The main results include the systematization of the features of the constitutional jurisdiction in Cuba, which facilitated the analysis of its potentialities and shortcomings. It is concluded that, although Cuba has a constitutional jurisdiction with a special process for the protection of constitutional rights in ordinary courts, which constitutes its main potential, it presents serious limitations for citizens' access due to the requirements established for the admission of cases.El presente artículo analiza la existencia de una jurisdicción constitucional en Cuba, tomando como base la Constitución de la República de Cuba de 2019 y sus normas de desarrollo. Tiene como objetivo identificar los principales rasgos característicos de la jurisdicción constitucional sobre la base de la regulación del amparo constitucional cubano, así como valorar su concepción como garantía para la protección de los derechos constitucionales en Cuba. Es una investigación cualitativa, en la que se emplearon los métodos teóricos de análisis-síntesis, inductivo-deductivo y el histórico. Como métodos propios para las investigaciones jurídicas se aplicó el método jurídico comparado y exegético jurídico. Se revisó la literatura más actualizada sobre la materia. Como principales resultados, se logró la sistematización de los rasgos característicos de la jurisdicción constitucional en Cuba, lo que favoreció el análisis de las potencialidades e insuficiencias en su concepción. Se concluye que, si bien existe en Cuba una jurisdicción constitucional con un proceso especial para la protección de los derechos constitucionales en sede ordinaria, lo que constituye la principal potencialidad, presenta serias limitaciones para el acceso de los ciudadanos debido a los requisitos establecidos para la admisión de los procesos.Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque2025-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/16810.61542/rjch.168Chornancap Law Review; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Comparative Constitutional Justice; 109–118Chornancap Revista Jurídica; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2025): Justicia Constitucional Comparada; 109–1182961-29342961-292610.61542/rjch.v3i2reponame:CAL-Chornancapinstname:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayequeinstacron:CALspahttps://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/168/156https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:www.icallambayeque.org.pe/rjchornancap:article/1682025-12-30T21:04:19Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ¿Constitutional jurisdiction in Cuba? : A necessary approach
¿Jurisdicción constitucional en Cuba? Una aproximación necesaria
title ¿Constitutional jurisdiction in Cuba? : A necessary approach
spellingShingle ¿Constitutional jurisdiction in Cuba? : A necessary approach
Mondelo Tamayo, Jorge Olver
Jurisdicción constitucional
Jurisdicción ordinaria
Cuba
Amparo
Tribunales de justicia
Constitutional jurisdiction
ordinary jurisdiction
Cuba
Amparo
courts of justice
title_short ¿Constitutional jurisdiction in Cuba? : A necessary approach
title_full ¿Constitutional jurisdiction in Cuba? : A necessary approach
title_fullStr ¿Constitutional jurisdiction in Cuba? : A necessary approach
title_full_unstemmed ¿Constitutional jurisdiction in Cuba? : A necessary approach
title_sort ¿Constitutional jurisdiction in Cuba? : A necessary approach
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Mondelo Tamayo, Jorge Olver
Mustelier Giro, Adriano
author Mondelo Tamayo, Jorge Olver
author_facet Mondelo Tamayo, Jorge Olver
Mustelier Giro, Adriano
author_role author
author2 Mustelier Giro, Adriano
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Jurisdicción constitucional
Jurisdicción ordinaria
Cuba
Amparo
Tribunales de justicia
Constitutional jurisdiction
ordinary jurisdiction
Cuba
Amparo
courts of justice
topic Jurisdicción constitucional
Jurisdicción ordinaria
Cuba
Amparo
Tribunales de justicia
Constitutional jurisdiction
ordinary jurisdiction
Cuba
Amparo
courts of justice
description This article analyses the existence of a constitutional jurisdiction in Cuba, based on the 2019 Constitution of the Republic of Cuba and its implementing regulations. It aims to identify the main characteristics of this constitutional jurisdiction, focusing on the regulation of the Cuban constitutional amparo, and to assess its conception as a guarantee for the protection of constitutional rights. This is a qualitative investigation that employed the theoretical methods of analysis-synthesis, inductive-deductive, and the historical method. Specific methods for legal research, such as the comparative legal and legal exegetical methods, were applied. The most up-to-date literature on the subject was reviewed. The main results include the systematization of the features of the constitutional jurisdiction in Cuba, which facilitated the analysis of its potentialities and shortcomings. It is concluded that, although Cuba has a constitutional jurisdiction with a special process for the protection of constitutional rights in ordinary courts, which constitutes its main potential, it presents serious limitations for citizens' access due to the requirements established for the admission of cases.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-12-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/168
10.61542/rjch.168
url https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/168
identifier_str_mv 10.61542/rjch.168
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistajuridicachornancap.icallambayeque.org.pe/index.php/oficial/article/view/168/156
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Chornancap Law Review; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Comparative Constitutional Justice; 109–118
Chornancap Revista Jurídica; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2025): Justicia Constitucional Comparada; 109–118
2961-2934
2961-2926
10.61542/rjch.v3i2
reponame:CAL-Chornancap
instname:Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
instacron:CAL
instname_str Colegio de Abogados de Lambayeque
instacron_str CAL
institution CAL
reponame_str CAL-Chornancap
collection CAL-Chornancap
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1870083421984784384
score 13.924476
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).