Impact of COVID-19-induced rural-rural migration on agricultural productivity in Delta State, Nigeria
Descripción del Articulo
This study was embarked on to unveil the impact of COVID-19-induced migration on agricultural productivity in Delta State, Nigeria. This survey study involved rural arable crop farmers. Data were collected from households and community survey of 517 families through structured interview schedule (qu...
Autores: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2021 |
Institución: | Universidad Nacional de Trujillo |
Repositorio: | Revista UNITRU - Scientia Agropecuaria |
Lenguaje: | inglés |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revistas.unitru.edu.pe:article/3297 |
Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/3297 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | COVID-19 rural-rural migration agricultural productivity out-migration immigration |
id |
2411-1783_39922427731f8c7ef7094a90545aabf2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.unitru.edu.pe:article/3297 |
network_acronym_str |
2411-1783 |
repository_id_str |
. |
network_name_str |
Revista UNITRU - Scientia Agropecuaria |
spelling |
Impact of COVID-19-induced rural-rural migration on agricultural productivity in Delta State, NigeriaOfuoku, Albert UkaroPeter Opia, Bonniface OjiAramide Ikpoza, Eguono COVID-19rural-rural migrationagricultural productivityout-migrationimmigrationThis study was embarked on to unveil the impact of COVID-19-induced migration on agricultural productivity in Delta State, Nigeria. This survey study involved rural arable crop farmers. Data were collected from households and community survey of 517 families through structured interview schedule (questionnaire administered by face to face interview). It was found that 41% and 30% of the present and second generations respectively, in receiving communities were immigrants. In receiving communities, 68% of the households were of the largest ethnic group compared to 95% fraction in sending communities. Households in sending communities had smaller farm sizes than those in receiving communities. In sending communities, 41% and 65% of the migrant and indigenous populations, respectively, contacted the disease, while there was no recorded case in receiving communities. The mean yield in receiving communities was higher than that in the sending communities. COVID-19 incidents and other factors influenced immigration to receiving communities. The soil and land factors in receiving communities also contributed to decision on migration. Migration increased agricultural productivity in receiving communities, while productivity was reduced in sending communities. However, other factors such as distance to farm, farm size, age of household head and assets also affected yields in sending and receiving communities. The policy implications are that government ought to have considered the fact that, naturally, farm families work while giving distances to themselves in farms. Communities need to participate in decisions on issues like this in the future to collectively, fathom a way out especially in rural communities.Universidad Nacional de Trujillo2021-02-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/329710.17268/sci.agropecu.2021.006Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2021): Enero-Marzo; 49-55Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2021): Enero-Marzo; 49-552306-67412077-9917reponame:Revista UNITRU - Scientia Agropecuariainstname:Universidad Nacional de Trujilloinstacron:UNITRUenghttp://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/3297/4019http://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/3297/4106Derechos de autor 2021 Raúl Siche, Bonniface Oji Peter Opia, Eguono Aramide Ikpozahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-06-01T15:35:35Zmail@mail.com - |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Impact of COVID-19-induced rural-rural migration on agricultural productivity in Delta State, Nigeria |
title |
Impact of COVID-19-induced rural-rural migration on agricultural productivity in Delta State, Nigeria |
spellingShingle |
Impact of COVID-19-induced rural-rural migration on agricultural productivity in Delta State, Nigeria Ofuoku, Albert Ukaro COVID-19 rural-rural migration agricultural productivity out-migration immigration |
title_short |
Impact of COVID-19-induced rural-rural migration on agricultural productivity in Delta State, Nigeria |
title_full |
Impact of COVID-19-induced rural-rural migration on agricultural productivity in Delta State, Nigeria |
title_fullStr |
Impact of COVID-19-induced rural-rural migration on agricultural productivity in Delta State, Nigeria |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of COVID-19-induced rural-rural migration on agricultural productivity in Delta State, Nigeria |
title_sort |
Impact of COVID-19-induced rural-rural migration on agricultural productivity in Delta State, Nigeria |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Ofuoku, Albert Ukaro Peter Opia, Bonniface Oji Aramide Ikpoza, Eguono |
author |
Ofuoku, Albert Ukaro |
author_facet |
Ofuoku, Albert Ukaro Peter Opia, Bonniface Oji Aramide Ikpoza, Eguono |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Peter Opia, Bonniface Oji Aramide Ikpoza, Eguono |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
COVID-19 rural-rural migration agricultural productivity out-migration immigration |
topic |
COVID-19 rural-rural migration agricultural productivity out-migration immigration |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
This study was embarked on to unveil the impact of COVID-19-induced migration on agricultural productivity in Delta State, Nigeria. This survey study involved rural arable crop farmers. Data were collected from households and community survey of 517 families through structured interview schedule (questionnaire administered by face to face interview). It was found that 41% and 30% of the present and second generations respectively, in receiving communities were immigrants. In receiving communities, 68% of the households were of the largest ethnic group compared to 95% fraction in sending communities. Households in sending communities had smaller farm sizes than those in receiving communities. In sending communities, 41% and 65% of the migrant and indigenous populations, respectively, contacted the disease, while there was no recorded case in receiving communities. The mean yield in receiving communities was higher than that in the sending communities. COVID-19 incidents and other factors influenced immigration to receiving communities. The soil and land factors in receiving communities also contributed to decision on migration. Migration increased agricultural productivity in receiving communities, while productivity was reduced in sending communities. However, other factors such as distance to farm, farm size, age of household head and assets also affected yields in sending and receiving communities. The policy implications are that government ought to have considered the fact that, naturally, farm families work while giving distances to themselves in farms. Communities need to participate in decisions on issues like this in the future to collectively, fathom a way out especially in rural communities. |
description |
This study was embarked on to unveil the impact of COVID-19-induced migration on agricultural productivity in Delta State, Nigeria. This survey study involved rural arable crop farmers. Data were collected from households and community survey of 517 families through structured interview schedule (questionnaire administered by face to face interview). It was found that 41% and 30% of the present and second generations respectively, in receiving communities were immigrants. In receiving communities, 68% of the households were of the largest ethnic group compared to 95% fraction in sending communities. Households in sending communities had smaller farm sizes than those in receiving communities. In sending communities, 41% and 65% of the migrant and indigenous populations, respectively, contacted the disease, while there was no recorded case in receiving communities. The mean yield in receiving communities was higher than that in the sending communities. COVID-19 incidents and other factors influenced immigration to receiving communities. The soil and land factors in receiving communities also contributed to decision on migration. Migration increased agricultural productivity in receiving communities, while productivity was reduced in sending communities. However, other factors such as distance to farm, farm size, age of household head and assets also affected yields in sending and receiving communities. The policy implications are that government ought to have considered the fact that, naturally, farm families work while giving distances to themselves in farms. Communities need to participate in decisions on issues like this in the future to collectively, fathom a way out especially in rural communities. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-02-09 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/3297 10.17268/sci.agropecu.2021.006 |
url |
http://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/3297 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.17268/sci.agropecu.2021.006 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/3297/4019 http://revistas.unitru.edu.pe/index.php/scientiaagrop/article/view/3297/4106 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2021 Raúl Siche, Bonniface Oji Peter Opia, Eguono Aramide Ikpoza https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2021 Raúl Siche, Bonniface Oji Peter Opia, Eguono Aramide Ikpoza https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2021): Enero-Marzo; 49-55 Scientia Agropecuaria; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2021): Enero-Marzo; 49-55 2306-6741 2077-9917 reponame:Revista UNITRU - Scientia Agropecuaria instname:Universidad Nacional de Trujillo instacron:UNITRU |
reponame_str |
Revista UNITRU - Scientia Agropecuaria |
collection |
Revista UNITRU - Scientia Agropecuaria |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo |
instacron_str |
UNITRU |
institution |
UNITRU |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
-
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mail@mail.com |
_version_ |
1701379323813953536 |
score |
13.959421 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).