Intention and Pedagogical Competence: Use of Collaborative Learning in the Subject of Mathematics in Secondary School

Descripción del Articulo

This review analyzes the experience reported by teachers of mathematics in public junior high schools in Jalisco, México, about the collaborative work of students to learn mathematical content and processes. Weekly logs of 30 teachers were analyzed during one school year to identify modalities of co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Gómez, Luis F.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2016
Institución:Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
Repositorio:Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representaciones
Lenguaje:español
inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.revistas.usil.edu.pe:article/121
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/121
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Collaborative learning; Mathematics education; unior high school
Aprendizaje colaborativo; Enseñanza de las matemáticas; Educación secundaria
id 2310-4635_a351303e216bd2d602368381861bbcff
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.usil.edu.pe:article/121
network_acronym_str 2310-4635
network_name_str Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representaciones
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Intention and Pedagogical Competence: Use of Collaborative Learning in the Subject of Mathematics in Secondary School
Intención y competencia pedagógica: el uso del aprendizaje colaborativo en la asignatura de matemáticas en secundaria
title Intention and Pedagogical Competence: Use of Collaborative Learning in the Subject of Mathematics in Secondary School
spellingShingle Intention and Pedagogical Competence: Use of Collaborative Learning in the Subject of Mathematics in Secondary School
Gómez, Luis F.
Collaborative learning; Mathematics education; unior high school
Aprendizaje colaborativo; Enseñanza de las matemáticas; Educación secundaria
title_short Intention and Pedagogical Competence: Use of Collaborative Learning in the Subject of Mathematics in Secondary School
title_full Intention and Pedagogical Competence: Use of Collaborative Learning in the Subject of Mathematics in Secondary School
title_fullStr Intention and Pedagogical Competence: Use of Collaborative Learning in the Subject of Mathematics in Secondary School
title_full_unstemmed Intention and Pedagogical Competence: Use of Collaborative Learning in the Subject of Mathematics in Secondary School
title_sort Intention and Pedagogical Competence: Use of Collaborative Learning in the Subject of Mathematics in Secondary School
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gómez, Luis F.
author Gómez, Luis F.
author_facet Gómez, Luis F.
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Collaborative learning; Mathematics education; unior high school
Aprendizaje colaborativo; Enseñanza de las matemáticas; Educación secundaria
topic Collaborative learning; Mathematics education; unior high school
Aprendizaje colaborativo; Enseñanza de las matemáticas; Educación secundaria
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This review analyzes the experience reported by teachers of mathematics in public junior high schools in Jalisco, México, about the collaborative work of students to learn mathematical content and processes. Weekly logs of 30 teachers were analyzed during one school year to identify modalities of collaborative work, contents or processes taught in this way, evaluative comments about this modality of work to achieve learning and the decisions made by teachers after evaluating its efficacy. It was found that all teachers promoted collaborative work but with varied frequency and in different ways, mainly to solve problems, for discovery activities, to generate hypotheses and to extract information from given information. Drawing from their experience, teachers made different evaluations about collaborative learning and consequently they took the decision to continue promoting it or decrease it and in the latter case increase the direct teaching and individual work of students. It is concluded that teachers try to promote learning through collaboration, but lacked the pedagogical competence required to do it, so not all of them had the results they expect, so some of them return to teach through direct teaching, giving explanations and writing demonstrations on the blackboard.
En este artículo se analiza la experiencia reportada por profesores de matemáticas de secundarias públicas en Jalisco acerca del trabajo colaborativo de los estudiantes para aprender contenidos y procesos matemáticos. Para ello se revisaron las bitácoras semanales de 30 profesores durante un ciclo escolar y se identificaron las modalidades del trabajo colaborativo, los contenidos o procesos en los que lo utilizaron, los comentarios evaluativos acerca de esta modalidad de trabajo para lograr aprendizajes, así como las decisiones que toman a partir de la reflexión que hacen sobre su eficacia. Se encontró que todos los profesores promovieron el trabajo colaborativo con muy variada frecuencia y en diversas modalidades, principalmente para la resolución de problemas, actividades de descubrimiento, generación de hipótesis, y para extraer información a partir de información dada. Los profesores mostraron comentarios evaluativos diferentes según su experiencia y, a partir de ellos, tomaron la decisión de continuar fomentándolo o de disminuirlo y, por tanto, incrementar la enseñanza directa y el trabajo individual de los alumnos. Se concluye que los profesores intentan promover el aprendizaje mediante la colaboración, pero que carecen de la competencia pedagógica requerida para hacerlo, por lo que no necesariamente tienen los resultados que esperan y algunos regresan a enseñar a través de explicaciones y demostraciones en el pizarrón.
description This review analyzes the experience reported by teachers of mathematics in public junior high schools in Jalisco, México, about the collaborative work of students to learn mathematical content and processes. Weekly logs of 30 teachers were analyzed during one school year to identify modalities of collaborative work, contents or processes taught in this way, evaluative comments about this modality of work to achieve learning and the decisions made by teachers after evaluating its efficacy. It was found that all teachers promoted collaborative work but with varied frequency and in different ways, mainly to solve problems, for discovery activities, to generate hypotheses and to extract information from given information. Drawing from their experience, teachers made different evaluations about collaborative learning and consequently they took the decision to continue promoting it or decrease it and in the latter case increase the direct teaching and individual work of students. It is concluded that teachers try to promote learning through collaboration, but lacked the pedagogical competence required to do it, so not all of them had the results they expect, so some of them return to teach through direct teaching, giving explanations and writing demonstrations on the blackboard.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-21
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion



info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/121
10.20511/pyr2016.v4n2.121
url http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/121
identifier_str_mv 10.20511/pyr2016.v4n2.121
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
eng
language spa
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/121/223
http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/121/224
http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/121/388
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Propósitos y Representaciones
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Propósitos y Representaciones
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola S.A.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola S.A.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Propósitos y Representaciones. Journal of Educational Psychology; Vol. 4, Núm. 2 (2016): Julio - Diciembre; 133-179
Propósitos y Representaciones; Vol. 4, Núm. 2 (2016): Julio - Diciembre; 133-179
Propósitos y Representaciones; Vol. 4, Núm. 2 (2016): Julio - Diciembre; 133-179
2310-4635
2307-7999
10.20511/pyr2016.v4n2
reponame:Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representaciones
instname:Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
instacron:USIL
reponame_str Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representaciones
collection Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representaciones
instname_str Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
instacron_str USIL
institution USIL
repository.name.fl_str_mv -
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mail@mail.com
_version_ 1684465319334117376
spelling Intention and Pedagogical Competence: Use of Collaborative Learning in the Subject of Mathematics in Secondary SchoolIntención y competencia pedagógica: el uso del aprendizaje colaborativo en la asignatura de matemáticas en secundariaGómez, Luis F.Collaborative learning; Mathematics education; unior high schoolAprendizaje colaborativo; Enseñanza de las matemáticas; Educación secundariaThis review analyzes the experience reported by teachers of mathematics in public junior high schools in Jalisco, México, about the collaborative work of students to learn mathematical content and processes. Weekly logs of 30 teachers were analyzed during one school year to identify modalities of collaborative work, contents or processes taught in this way, evaluative comments about this modality of work to achieve learning and the decisions made by teachers after evaluating its efficacy. It was found that all teachers promoted collaborative work but with varied frequency and in different ways, mainly to solve problems, for discovery activities, to generate hypotheses and to extract information from given information. Drawing from their experience, teachers made different evaluations about collaborative learning and consequently they took the decision to continue promoting it or decrease it and in the latter case increase the direct teaching and individual work of students. It is concluded that teachers try to promote learning through collaboration, but lacked the pedagogical competence required to do it, so not all of them had the results they expect, so some of them return to teach through direct teaching, giving explanations and writing demonstrations on the blackboard.En este artículo se analiza la experiencia reportada por profesores de matemáticas de secundarias públicas en Jalisco acerca del trabajo colaborativo de los estudiantes para aprender contenidos y procesos matemáticos. Para ello se revisaron las bitácoras semanales de 30 profesores durante un ciclo escolar y se identificaron las modalidades del trabajo colaborativo, los contenidos o procesos en los que lo utilizaron, los comentarios evaluativos acerca de esta modalidad de trabajo para lograr aprendizajes, así como las decisiones que toman a partir de la reflexión que hacen sobre su eficacia. Se encontró que todos los profesores promovieron el trabajo colaborativo con muy variada frecuencia y en diversas modalidades, principalmente para la resolución de problemas, actividades de descubrimiento, generación de hipótesis, y para extraer información a partir de información dada. Los profesores mostraron comentarios evaluativos diferentes según su experiencia y, a partir de ellos, tomaron la decisión de continuar fomentándolo o de disminuirlo y, por tanto, incrementar la enseñanza directa y el trabajo individual de los alumnos. Se concluye que los profesores intentan promover el aprendizaje mediante la colaboración, pero que carecen de la competencia pedagógica requerida para hacerlo, por lo que no necesariamente tienen los resultados que esperan y algunos regresan a enseñar a través de explicaciones y demostraciones en el pizarrón.Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola S.A.2016-10-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessapplication/pdfapplication/pdftext/htmlhttp://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/12110.20511/pyr2016.v4n2.121Propósitos y Representaciones. Journal of Educational Psychology; Vol. 4, Núm. 2 (2016): Julio - Diciembre; 133-179Propósitos y Representaciones; Vol. 4, Núm. 2 (2016): Julio - Diciembre; 133-179Propósitos y Representaciones; Vol. 4, Núm. 2 (2016): Julio - Diciembre; 133-1792310-46352307-799910.20511/pyr2016.v4n2reponame:Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representacionesinstname:Universidad San Ignacio de Loyolainstacron:USILspaenghttp://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/121/223http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/121/224http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/121/388Copyright (c) 2016 Propósitos y Representacioneshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-09-08T18:35:31Zmail@mail.com -
score 13.955691
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).