Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Opinions on Family Diversity
Descripción del Articulo
This article aims to do an analysis based on the opinion of primary school teachers on family models that are different from the traditional nuclear family. We worked with 60 teachers from Montevideo and the metropolitan area. They answered the Questionnaire: Teachers' Opinion on Family Diver...
Autores: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2016 |
Institución: | Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola |
Repositorio: | Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representaciones |
Lenguaje: | español inglés |
OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.revistas.usil.edu.pe:article/119 |
Enlace del recurso: | http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/119 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
Materia: | Family Diversity; Teachers’ opinions; Primary education Diversidad familiar; Ideas docentes; Educación primaria |
id |
2310-4635_8ee0db53b05cff318fc65006b7606776 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.usil.edu.pe:article/119 |
network_acronym_str |
2310-4635 |
network_name_str |
Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representaciones |
spelling |
Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Opinions on Family DiversityAnálisis de ideas de docentes de educación primaria sobre diversidad familiarCapano Bosch, AlvaroMassonnier, NatalieGonzález Tornaría, Maria del L.Family Diversity; Teachers’ opinions; Primary educationDiversidad familiar; Ideas docentes; Educación primariaThis article aims to do an analysis based on the opinion of primary school teachers on family models that are different from the traditional nuclear family. We worked with 60 teachers from Montevideo and the metropolitan area. They answered the Questionnaire: Teachers' Opinion on Family Diversity (CIDF for its Spanish acronym) (Morgado, Jimenez-Lagares & Gonzalez, 2009). The data indicate that teachers do not share a homogeneous point of view regarding the different household types. Adoptive families, divorced parents families, and single-parent families headed by single mothers had a better acceptance among teachers than homoparental families or those headed by single fathers. Items related to homoparental families were answered by fewer people. Teachers with postgraduate education were more tolerant and flexible towards family diversity. These results are discussed in light of the necessary adaptations in primary education with respect to the diversity of families existing there.Este artículo intenta indagar en las ideas de los docentes de educación primaria sobre los modelos familiares que se apartan del tradicional de familia nuclear. Se trabajó con 60 docentes de Montevideo y zona metropolitana respondiendo el Cuestionario de Ideas de los Docentes sobre Diversidad Familiar –CIDF– (Morgado, Jiménez-Lagares & González, 2009). Los datos obtenidos refieren que los docentes no mantienen una visión homogénea de los distintos tipos de hogares. Las familias adoptivas, las de progenitores divorciados y las monoparentales bajo responsabilidad de madres tuvieron mejor aceptación entre los docentes que las homoparentales o las encabezadas en solitario por un padre. Los ítems relativos a familias homoparentales fueron respondidos por menos personas. Los docentes con formación de posgrado se mostraron más tolerantes y flexibles ante la diversidad familiar. Se discuten estos resultados a la luz de las necesarias adaptaciones en la educación primaria con respecto a la diversidad de familias que allí asisten.Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola S.A.2016-10-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessapplication/pdfapplication/pdftext/htmlhttp://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/11910.20511/pyr2016.v4n2.119Propósitos y Representaciones. Journal of Educational Psychology; Vol. 4, Núm. 2 (2016): Julio - Diciembre; 15-71Propósitos y Representaciones; Vol. 4, Núm. 2 (2016): Julio - Diciembre; 15-71Propósitos y Representaciones; Vol. 4, Núm. 2 (2016): Julio - Diciembre; 15-712310-46352307-799910.20511/pyr2016.v4n2reponame:Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representacionesinstname:Universidad San Ignacio de Loyolainstacron:USILspaenghttp://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/119/220http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/119/219http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/119/385Copyright (c) 2016 Propósitos y Representacioneshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-09-08T18:35:39Zmail@mail.com - |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Opinions on Family Diversity Análisis de ideas de docentes de educación primaria sobre diversidad familiar |
title |
Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Opinions on Family Diversity |
spellingShingle |
Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Opinions on Family Diversity Capano Bosch, Alvaro Family Diversity; Teachers’ opinions; Primary education Diversidad familiar; Ideas docentes; Educación primaria |
title_short |
Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Opinions on Family Diversity |
title_full |
Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Opinions on Family Diversity |
title_fullStr |
Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Opinions on Family Diversity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Opinions on Family Diversity |
title_sort |
Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Opinions on Family Diversity |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Capano Bosch, Alvaro Massonnier, Natalie González Tornaría, Maria del L. |
author |
Capano Bosch, Alvaro |
author_facet |
Capano Bosch, Alvaro Massonnier, Natalie González Tornaría, Maria del L. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Massonnier, Natalie González Tornaría, Maria del L. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Family Diversity; Teachers’ opinions; Primary education Diversidad familiar; Ideas docentes; Educación primaria |
topic |
Family Diversity; Teachers’ opinions; Primary education Diversidad familiar; Ideas docentes; Educación primaria |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
This article aims to do an analysis based on the opinion of primary school teachers on family models that are different from the traditional nuclear family. We worked with 60 teachers from Montevideo and the metropolitan area. They answered the Questionnaire: Teachers' Opinion on Family Diversity (CIDF for its Spanish acronym) (Morgado, Jimenez-Lagares & Gonzalez, 2009). The data indicate that teachers do not share a homogeneous point of view regarding the different household types. Adoptive families, divorced parents families, and single-parent families headed by single mothers had a better acceptance among teachers than homoparental families or those headed by single fathers. Items related to homoparental families were answered by fewer people. Teachers with postgraduate education were more tolerant and flexible towards family diversity. These results are discussed in light of the necessary adaptations in primary education with respect to the diversity of families existing there. Este artículo intenta indagar en las ideas de los docentes de educación primaria sobre los modelos familiares que se apartan del tradicional de familia nuclear. Se trabajó con 60 docentes de Montevideo y zona metropolitana respondiendo el Cuestionario de Ideas de los Docentes sobre Diversidad Familiar –CIDF– (Morgado, Jiménez-Lagares & González, 2009). Los datos obtenidos refieren que los docentes no mantienen una visión homogénea de los distintos tipos de hogares. Las familias adoptivas, las de progenitores divorciados y las monoparentales bajo responsabilidad de madres tuvieron mejor aceptación entre los docentes que las homoparentales o las encabezadas en solitario por un padre. Los ítems relativos a familias homoparentales fueron respondidos por menos personas. Los docentes con formación de posgrado se mostraron más tolerantes y flexibles ante la diversidad familiar. Se discuten estos resultados a la luz de las necesarias adaptaciones en la educación primaria con respecto a la diversidad de familias que allí asisten. |
description |
This article aims to do an analysis based on the opinion of primary school teachers on family models that are different from the traditional nuclear family. We worked with 60 teachers from Montevideo and the metropolitan area. They answered the Questionnaire: Teachers' Opinion on Family Diversity (CIDF for its Spanish acronym) (Morgado, Jimenez-Lagares & Gonzalez, 2009). The data indicate that teachers do not share a homogeneous point of view regarding the different household types. Adoptive families, divorced parents families, and single-parent families headed by single mothers had a better acceptance among teachers than homoparental families or those headed by single fathers. Items related to homoparental families were answered by fewer people. Teachers with postgraduate education were more tolerant and flexible towards family diversity. These results are discussed in light of the necessary adaptations in primary education with respect to the diversity of families existing there. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-21 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/119 10.20511/pyr2016.v4n2.119 |
url |
http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/119 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.20511/pyr2016.v4n2.119 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa eng |
language |
spa eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/119/220 http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/119/219 http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/119/385 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Propósitos y Representaciones http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Propósitos y Representaciones http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola S.A. |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola S.A. |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Propósitos y Representaciones. Journal of Educational Psychology; Vol. 4, Núm. 2 (2016): Julio - Diciembre; 15-71 Propósitos y Representaciones; Vol. 4, Núm. 2 (2016): Julio - Diciembre; 15-71 Propósitos y Representaciones; Vol. 4, Núm. 2 (2016): Julio - Diciembre; 15-71 2310-4635 2307-7999 10.20511/pyr2016.v4n2 reponame:Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representaciones instname:Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola instacron:USIL |
reponame_str |
Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representaciones |
collection |
Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representaciones |
instname_str |
Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola |
instacron_str |
USIL |
institution |
USIL |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
-
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mail@mail.com |
_version_ |
1684465320974090240 |
score |
13.982926 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).