Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Opinions on Family Diversity

Descripción del Articulo

This article aims to do an analysis based on the opinion of primary school teachers on family models that are different from the traditional nuclear family.  We worked with 60 teachers from Montevideo and the metropolitan area.  They answered the Questionnaire: Teachers' Opinion on Family Diver...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Capano Bosch, Alvaro, Massonnier, Natalie, González Tornaría, Maria del L.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2016
Institución:Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
Repositorio:Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representaciones
Lenguaje:español
inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.revistas.usil.edu.pe:article/119
Enlace del recurso:http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/119
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
Materia:Family Diversity; Teachers’ opinions; Primary education
Diversidad familiar; Ideas docentes; Educación primaria
id 2310-4635_8ee0db53b05cff318fc65006b7606776
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.usil.edu.pe:article/119
network_acronym_str 2310-4635
network_name_str Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representaciones
spelling Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Opinions on Family DiversityAnálisis de ideas de docentes de educación primaria sobre diversidad familiarCapano Bosch, AlvaroMassonnier, NatalieGonzález Tornaría, Maria del L.Family Diversity; Teachers’ opinions; Primary educationDiversidad familiar; Ideas docentes; Educación primariaThis article aims to do an analysis based on the opinion of primary school teachers on family models that are different from the traditional nuclear family.  We worked with 60 teachers from Montevideo and the metropolitan area.  They answered the Questionnaire: Teachers' Opinion on Family Diversity (CIDF for its Spanish acronym) (Morgado, Jimenez-Lagares & Gonzalez, 2009).  The data indicate that teachers do not share a homogeneous point of view regarding the different household types. Adoptive families, divorced parents families, and single-parent families headed by single mothers had a better acceptance among teachers than homoparental families or those headed by single fathers.  Items related to homoparental families were answered by fewer people. Teachers with postgraduate education were more tolerant and flexible towards family diversity. These results are discussed in light of the necessary adaptations in primary education with respect to the diversity of families existing there.Este artículo intenta indagar en las ideas de los docentes de educación primaria sobre los modelos familiares que se apartan del tradicional de familia nuclear. Se trabajó con 60 docentes de Montevideo y zona metropolitana respondiendo el Cuestionario de Ideas de los Docentes sobre Diversidad Familiar –CIDF– (Morgado, Jiménez-Lagares & González, 2009). Los datos obtenidos refieren que los docentes no mantienen una visión homogénea de los distintos tipos de hogares. Las familias adoptivas, las de progenitores divorciados y las monoparentales bajo responsabilidad de madres tuvieron mejor aceptación entre los docentes que las homoparentales o las encabezadas en solitario por un padre. Los ítems relativos a familias homoparentales fueron respondidos por menos personas. Los docentes con formación de posgrado se mostraron más tolerantes y flexibles ante la diversidad familiar. Se discuten estos resultados a la luz de las necesarias adaptaciones en la educación primaria con respecto a la diversidad de familias que allí asisten.Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola S.A.2016-10-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessapplication/pdfapplication/pdftext/htmlhttp://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/11910.20511/pyr2016.v4n2.119Propósitos y Representaciones. Journal of Educational Psychology; Vol. 4, Núm. 2 (2016): Julio - Diciembre; 15-71Propósitos y Representaciones; Vol. 4, Núm. 2 (2016): Julio - Diciembre; 15-71Propósitos y Representaciones; Vol. 4, Núm. 2 (2016): Julio - Diciembre; 15-712310-46352307-799910.20511/pyr2016.v4n2reponame:Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representacionesinstname:Universidad San Ignacio de Loyolainstacron:USILspaenghttp://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/119/220http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/119/219http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/119/385Copyright (c) 2016 Propósitos y Representacioneshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-09-08T18:35:39Zmail@mail.com -
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Opinions on Family Diversity
Análisis de ideas de docentes de educación primaria sobre diversidad familiar
title Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Opinions on Family Diversity
spellingShingle Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Opinions on Family Diversity
Capano Bosch, Alvaro
Family Diversity; Teachers’ opinions; Primary education
Diversidad familiar; Ideas docentes; Educación primaria
title_short Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Opinions on Family Diversity
title_full Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Opinions on Family Diversity
title_fullStr Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Opinions on Family Diversity
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Opinions on Family Diversity
title_sort Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Opinions on Family Diversity
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Capano Bosch, Alvaro
Massonnier, Natalie
González Tornaría, Maria del L.
author Capano Bosch, Alvaro
author_facet Capano Bosch, Alvaro
Massonnier, Natalie
González Tornaría, Maria del L.
author_role author
author2 Massonnier, Natalie
González Tornaría, Maria del L.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Family Diversity; Teachers’ opinions; Primary education
Diversidad familiar; Ideas docentes; Educación primaria
topic Family Diversity; Teachers’ opinions; Primary education
Diversidad familiar; Ideas docentes; Educación primaria
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This article aims to do an analysis based on the opinion of primary school teachers on family models that are different from the traditional nuclear family.  We worked with 60 teachers from Montevideo and the metropolitan area.  They answered the Questionnaire: Teachers' Opinion on Family Diversity (CIDF for its Spanish acronym) (Morgado, Jimenez-Lagares & Gonzalez, 2009).  The data indicate that teachers do not share a homogeneous point of view regarding the different household types. Adoptive families, divorced parents families, and single-parent families headed by single mothers had a better acceptance among teachers than homoparental families or those headed by single fathers.  Items related to homoparental families were answered by fewer people. Teachers with postgraduate education were more tolerant and flexible towards family diversity. These results are discussed in light of the necessary adaptations in primary education with respect to the diversity of families existing there.
Este artículo intenta indagar en las ideas de los docentes de educación primaria sobre los modelos familiares que se apartan del tradicional de familia nuclear. Se trabajó con 60 docentes de Montevideo y zona metropolitana respondiendo el Cuestionario de Ideas de los Docentes sobre Diversidad Familiar –CIDF– (Morgado, Jiménez-Lagares & González, 2009). Los datos obtenidos refieren que los docentes no mantienen una visión homogénea de los distintos tipos de hogares. Las familias adoptivas, las de progenitores divorciados y las monoparentales bajo responsabilidad de madres tuvieron mejor aceptación entre los docentes que las homoparentales o las encabezadas en solitario por un padre. Los ítems relativos a familias homoparentales fueron respondidos por menos personas. Los docentes con formación de posgrado se mostraron más tolerantes y flexibles ante la diversidad familiar. Se discuten estos resultados a la luz de las necesarias adaptaciones en la educación primaria con respecto a la diversidad de familias que allí asisten.
description This article aims to do an analysis based on the opinion of primary school teachers on family models that are different from the traditional nuclear family.  We worked with 60 teachers from Montevideo and the metropolitan area.  They answered the Questionnaire: Teachers' Opinion on Family Diversity (CIDF for its Spanish acronym) (Morgado, Jimenez-Lagares & Gonzalez, 2009).  The data indicate that teachers do not share a homogeneous point of view regarding the different household types. Adoptive families, divorced parents families, and single-parent families headed by single mothers had a better acceptance among teachers than homoparental families or those headed by single fathers.  Items related to homoparental families were answered by fewer people. Teachers with postgraduate education were more tolerant and flexible towards family diversity. These results are discussed in light of the necessary adaptations in primary education with respect to the diversity of families existing there.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-21
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion



info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/119
10.20511/pyr2016.v4n2.119
url http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/119
identifier_str_mv 10.20511/pyr2016.v4n2.119
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
eng
language spa
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/119/220
http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/119/219
http://revistas.usil.edu.pe/index.php/pyr/article/view/119/385
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Propósitos y Representaciones
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Propósitos y Representaciones
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola S.A.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola S.A.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Propósitos y Representaciones. Journal of Educational Psychology; Vol. 4, Núm. 2 (2016): Julio - Diciembre; 15-71
Propósitos y Representaciones; Vol. 4, Núm. 2 (2016): Julio - Diciembre; 15-71
Propósitos y Representaciones; Vol. 4, Núm. 2 (2016): Julio - Diciembre; 15-71
2310-4635
2307-7999
10.20511/pyr2016.v4n2
reponame:Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representaciones
instname:Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
instacron:USIL
reponame_str Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representaciones
collection Revista USIL - Propósitos y Representaciones
instname_str Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
instacron_str USIL
institution USIL
repository.name.fl_str_mv -
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mail@mail.com
_version_ 1684465320974090240
score 13.982926
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).