Fetal macrosomia: Definition, Prediction, Risk and Prevention.
Descripción del Articulo
Fetal macrosomia has been traditionally defined based on an arbitrary birthweight. However, fetal macrosomia is currently defined as a large for gestational age infant (>90 percentil) because of increased perinatal risk. This prospective investigation performed at San Bartolome's Hospital in...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2015 |
| Institución: | Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología |
| Repositorio: | Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.spog:article/1633 |
| Enlace del recurso: | http://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1633 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| id |
2304-5132_ec83a7c513b5701d7b5d77d709ce7bf4 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.spog:article/1633 |
| network_acronym_str |
2304-5132 |
| repository_id_str |
. |
| network_name_str |
Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia |
| spelling |
Fetal macrosomia: Definition, Prediction, Risk and Prevention.Macrosomía fetal: Definición, Predicción, Riesgos y Prevención.Pacora Portella, PercyFetal macrosomia has been traditionally defined based on an arbitrary birthweight. However, fetal macrosomia is currently defined as a large for gestational age infant (>90 percentil) because of increased perinatal risk. This prospective investigation performed at San Bartolome's Hospital in Lima, Peru, included 1697 pregnant women from June 1990 to June 1993. 278 pregnant women had large infants (LGA) and 1 336 had normal sized infants. The predictor factors for LGA were: excessive weight gain (70%), male fetal sex (77%), placental width > 4 cm (74%), age over 30 years old (41,7%), obesity (33,5%), previous large infant (27%), fasting blood sugar > 79 mg/cIl (21,6%), 2h post prandial glucose > 110 mg/dl (20,7%), height > 160 cm (20%), familial diabetes (13,7%) and anemia (10, 1 %). The predictable maternal complications were: excessive weight gain, anemia, threatened abortion, placenta prove, polihydramnios, cord twist, arterial hypertensionassociated with premature rupture of membranes, dysfunctianal labor with prolonged second stage because of feto pelvic disproportion and shoulder dystocia. We recomned to avoid and treat obesity before pregnancy, to discover risk factors at antenatal clinic and use caloric restriction, prophylactic insulin and induction of labor before 42 week of gestation in order to avoid fetal macrosomia.Tradicionalmente la macrosomía fetal ha sido definida en base a un peso arbitrario. Sin embargo, la macrosomía fetal actualmente debe ser definida como el feto grande para la edad de gestación ( > percentil 90) en base al incrementado riesgo perinatal que presenta. En un estudio prospectivo que incluyó 1 697 gestaciones simples, 278 tuvieron fetos macrosómicos (GEG) y 1 336 fueron fetos de tamaño adecuado (AEG). Los factores predictivos de GEG en orden de especificidad fueron: ganancia ponderal excesiva (70%), feto de sexo varón (77%), grosor placentario > 4 cm (74%), edad mayor de 30 años (41,7%), obesidad (33,5%), antecedente de feto grande (27%), glicemia en ayunas > 79 mg/dl (21,6%), glucosa posprandial a las 2 horas > 110 mg/dl (20,7%), talla > 160 cm (20%), diabetes familiar (113,7%) y anemia (10,1 %). Las complicaciones maternas que debieran hacernos pensar en macrosomía fetal son ganancia ponderal excesiva, anemia, amenaza de aborto, placenta previa, polihidramnios, circular de cordón, hipertensión arterial asociada con ruptura prematura de membranas, labor disfuncional con enfoque de riesgo y el empleo de medidas de restricción calórica, insulina profiláctica y la inducción del parto antes de la semana 42, a fin de prevenir la macrosomía fetal.Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología2015-07-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/163310.31403/rpgo.v39i1633Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 39, Núm. 17 (1993); 42-502304-51322304-5124reponame:Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetriciainstname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecologíainstacron:SPOGspahttp://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1633/pdf_173http://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1633/pdf_174info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-05-31T15:51:43Zmail@mail.com - |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Fetal macrosomia: Definition, Prediction, Risk and Prevention. Macrosomía fetal: Definición, Predicción, Riesgos y Prevención. |
| title |
Fetal macrosomia: Definition, Prediction, Risk and Prevention. |
| spellingShingle |
Fetal macrosomia: Definition, Prediction, Risk and Prevention. Pacora Portella, Percy |
| title_short |
Fetal macrosomia: Definition, Prediction, Risk and Prevention. |
| title_full |
Fetal macrosomia: Definition, Prediction, Risk and Prevention. |
| title_fullStr |
Fetal macrosomia: Definition, Prediction, Risk and Prevention. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Fetal macrosomia: Definition, Prediction, Risk and Prevention. |
| title_sort |
Fetal macrosomia: Definition, Prediction, Risk and Prevention. |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Pacora Portella, Percy |
| author |
Pacora Portella, Percy |
| author_facet |
Pacora Portella, Percy |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Fetal macrosomia has been traditionally defined based on an arbitrary birthweight. However, fetal macrosomia is currently defined as a large for gestational age infant (>90 percentil) because of increased perinatal risk. This prospective investigation performed at San Bartolome's Hospital in Lima, Peru, included 1697 pregnant women from June 1990 to June 1993. 278 pregnant women had large infants (LGA) and 1 336 had normal sized infants. The predictor factors for LGA were: excessive weight gain (70%), male fetal sex (77%), placental width > 4 cm (74%), age over 30 years old (41,7%), obesity (33,5%), previous large infant (27%), fasting blood sugar > 79 mg/cIl (21,6%), 2h post prandial glucose > 110 mg/dl (20,7%), height > 160 cm (20%), familial diabetes (13,7%) and anemia (10, 1 %). The predictable maternal complications were: excessive weight gain, anemia, threatened abortion, placenta prove, polihydramnios, cord twist, arterial hypertensionassociated with premature rupture of membranes, dysfunctianal labor with prolonged second stage because of feto pelvic disproportion and shoulder dystocia. We recomned to avoid and treat obesity before pregnancy, to discover risk factors at antenatal clinic and use caloric restriction, prophylactic insulin and induction of labor before 42 week of gestation in order to avoid fetal macrosomia. Tradicionalmente la macrosomía fetal ha sido definida en base a un peso arbitrario. Sin embargo, la macrosomía fetal actualmente debe ser definida como el feto grande para la edad de gestación ( > percentil 90) en base al incrementado riesgo perinatal que presenta. En un estudio prospectivo que incluyó 1 697 gestaciones simples, 278 tuvieron fetos macrosómicos (GEG) y 1 336 fueron fetos de tamaño adecuado (AEG). Los factores predictivos de GEG en orden de especificidad fueron: ganancia ponderal excesiva (70%), feto de sexo varón (77%), grosor placentario > 4 cm (74%), edad mayor de 30 años (41,7%), obesidad (33,5%), antecedente de feto grande (27%), glicemia en ayunas > 79 mg/dl (21,6%), glucosa posprandial a las 2 horas > 110 mg/dl (20,7%), talla > 160 cm (20%), diabetes familiar (113,7%) y anemia (10,1 %). Las complicaciones maternas que debieran hacernos pensar en macrosomía fetal son ganancia ponderal excesiva, anemia, amenaza de aborto, placenta previa, polihidramnios, circular de cordón, hipertensión arterial asociada con ruptura prematura de membranas, labor disfuncional con enfoque de riesgo y el empleo de medidas de restricción calórica, insulina profiláctica y la inducción del parto antes de la semana 42, a fin de prevenir la macrosomía fetal. |
| description |
Fetal macrosomia has been traditionally defined based on an arbitrary birthweight. However, fetal macrosomia is currently defined as a large for gestational age infant (>90 percentil) because of increased perinatal risk. This prospective investigation performed at San Bartolome's Hospital in Lima, Peru, included 1697 pregnant women from June 1990 to June 1993. 278 pregnant women had large infants (LGA) and 1 336 had normal sized infants. The predictor factors for LGA were: excessive weight gain (70%), male fetal sex (77%), placental width > 4 cm (74%), age over 30 years old (41,7%), obesity (33,5%), previous large infant (27%), fasting blood sugar > 79 mg/cIl (21,6%), 2h post prandial glucose > 110 mg/dl (20,7%), height > 160 cm (20%), familial diabetes (13,7%) and anemia (10, 1 %). The predictable maternal complications were: excessive weight gain, anemia, threatened abortion, placenta prove, polihydramnios, cord twist, arterial hypertensionassociated with premature rupture of membranes, dysfunctianal labor with prolonged second stage because of feto pelvic disproportion and shoulder dystocia. We recomned to avoid and treat obesity before pregnancy, to discover risk factors at antenatal clinic and use caloric restriction, prophylactic insulin and induction of labor before 42 week of gestation in order to avoid fetal macrosomia. |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-07-28 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1633 10.31403/rpgo.v39i1633 |
| url |
http://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1633 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.31403/rpgo.v39i1633 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1633/pdf_173 http://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1633/pdf_174 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 39, Núm. 17 (1993); 42-50 2304-5132 2304-5124 reponame:Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia instname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología instacron:SPOG |
| reponame_str |
Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia |
| collection |
Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia |
| instname_str |
Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología |
| instacron_str |
SPOG |
| institution |
SPOG |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
-
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mail@mail.com |
| _version_ |
1701289837545390080 |
| score |
13.888049 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).