CORRELATION BETWEEN MAMMOGRAPHY AND ULTRASOUND IN BREAST CANCER

Descripción del Articulo

We report our experience with 95 cases of breast carcinoma, operated during the years 1983-1985, to which was performed as exploratory methodical, among others, an ultrasound and a mammogram. The images are described, both mammography and ultrasound, we have found. In mammography screening, we obtai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Aviño, J., Blanes, J., Blanes, A., Bonilla Musoles, F., Pinotti, J.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de Publicación:2015
Institución:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
Repositorio:Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
Lenguaje:español
OAI Identifier:oai:ojs.spog:article/618
Enlace del recurso:http://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/618
Nivel de acceso:acceso abierto
id 2304-5132_bf156d360650f339b8e2b7ad27e301b3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.spog:article/618
network_acronym_str 2304-5132
repository_id_str .
network_name_str Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
spelling CORRELATION BETWEEN MAMMOGRAPHY AND ULTRASOUND IN BREAST CANCERCORRELACION ENTRE LA MAMOGRAFIA Y LA ECOGRAFIA EN EL CANCER DE MAMAAviño, J.Blanes, J.Blanes, A.Bonilla Musoles, F.Pinotti, J.We report our experience with 95 cases of breast carcinoma, operated during the years 1983-1985, to which was performed as exploratory methodical, among others, an ultrasound and a mammogram. The images are described, both mammography and ultrasound, we have found. In mammography screening, we obtained a 12.63% false negative, which then corresponded to carcinomas in stages T1 and T2. We study the correlation with other exploration techniques. Ultrasound there was a 21.05% false negative. The importance of mammography is valued more accurate method, although advising be supplemented with other diagnostic methods.Presentamos nuestra experiencia con 95 casos de carcinoma de mama, operados durante los años 1983 a 1985, a los cuales se les realizó como metódica exploratoria, entre otras, una ecografía y una mamografía. Se describe las imágenes, tanto mamográficas como ecográficas, que hemos encontrado. En el control mamográfico, obtuvimos un 12.63% de falsos negativos, que luego correspondieron a carcinomas en estadios T1 y T2. Se estudia la correlación con otras técnicas exploratorias. Con ecografía hubo un 21.05% de falsos negativos. Se valora la importancia de la mamografía como método más preciso, aunque aconsejando se complemente con otros métodos diagnósticos.Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología2015-05-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/61810.31403/rpgo.v31i618Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 31, Núm. 3 (1987); 56-592304-51322304-5124reponame:Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetriciainstname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecologíainstacron:SPOGspahttp://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/618/582info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-05-24T15:51:16Zmail@mail.com -
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv CORRELATION BETWEEN MAMMOGRAPHY AND ULTRASOUND IN BREAST CANCER
CORRELACION ENTRE LA MAMOGRAFIA Y LA ECOGRAFIA EN EL CANCER DE MAMA
title CORRELATION BETWEEN MAMMOGRAPHY AND ULTRASOUND IN BREAST CANCER
spellingShingle CORRELATION BETWEEN MAMMOGRAPHY AND ULTRASOUND IN BREAST CANCER
Aviño, J.
title_short CORRELATION BETWEEN MAMMOGRAPHY AND ULTRASOUND IN BREAST CANCER
title_full CORRELATION BETWEEN MAMMOGRAPHY AND ULTRASOUND IN BREAST CANCER
title_fullStr CORRELATION BETWEEN MAMMOGRAPHY AND ULTRASOUND IN BREAST CANCER
title_full_unstemmed CORRELATION BETWEEN MAMMOGRAPHY AND ULTRASOUND IN BREAST CANCER
title_sort CORRELATION BETWEEN MAMMOGRAPHY AND ULTRASOUND IN BREAST CANCER
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Aviño, J.
Blanes, J.
Blanes, A.
Bonilla Musoles, F.
Pinotti, J.
author Aviño, J.
author_facet Aviño, J.
Blanes, J.
Blanes, A.
Bonilla Musoles, F.
Pinotti, J.
author_role author
author2 Blanes, J.
Blanes, A.
Bonilla Musoles, F.
Pinotti, J.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv We report our experience with 95 cases of breast carcinoma, operated during the years 1983-1985, to which was performed as exploratory methodical, among others, an ultrasound and a mammogram. The images are described, both mammography and ultrasound, we have found. In mammography screening, we obtained a 12.63% false negative, which then corresponded to carcinomas in stages T1 and T2. We study the correlation with other exploration techniques. Ultrasound there was a 21.05% false negative. The importance of mammography is valued more accurate method, although advising be supplemented with other diagnostic methods.
Presentamos nuestra experiencia con 95 casos de carcinoma de mama, operados durante los años 1983 a 1985, a los cuales se les realizó como metódica exploratoria, entre otras, una ecografía y una mamografía. Se describe las imágenes, tanto mamográficas como ecográficas, que hemos encontrado. En el control mamográfico, obtuvimos un 12.63% de falsos negativos, que luego correspondieron a carcinomas en estadios T1 y T2. Se estudia la correlación con otras técnicas exploratorias. Con ecografía hubo un 21.05% de falsos negativos. Se valora la importancia de la mamografía como método más preciso, aunque aconsejando se complemente con otros métodos diagnósticos.
description We report our experience with 95 cases of breast carcinoma, operated during the years 1983-1985, to which was performed as exploratory methodical, among others, an ultrasound and a mammogram. The images are described, both mammography and ultrasound, we have found. In mammography screening, we obtained a 12.63% false negative, which then corresponded to carcinomas in stages T1 and T2. We study the correlation with other exploration techniques. Ultrasound there was a 21.05% false negative. The importance of mammography is valued more accurate method, although advising be supplemented with other diagnostic methods.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-05-17
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/618
10.31403/rpgo.v31i618
url http://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/618
identifier_str_mv 10.31403/rpgo.v31i618
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/618/582
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 31, Núm. 3 (1987); 56-59
2304-5132
2304-5124
reponame:Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
instname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron:SPOG
reponame_str Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
collection Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia
instname_str Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología
instacron_str SPOG
institution SPOG
repository.name.fl_str_mv -
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mail@mail.com
_version_ 1700655654776078336
score 13.914502
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).