Evaluation of the use of intrauterine device Lipper as a method of family planning
Descripción del Articulo
The results of using large Lippes Loop in 436 patients from a Family Planning Center of Lima are presented. 5.384 months of use were tabulated. 10 unintended pregnancies (failure rate 2.21) two of them were seen unnoticed IUD expulsion The main adverse effects were vaginal discharge, pelvic pain and...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2015 |
| Institución: | Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología |
| Repositorio: | Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.spog:article/808 |
| Enlace del recurso: | http://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/808 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| id |
2304-5132_969d96e323d98b09f0bd51a3cb7732fd |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.spog:article/808 |
| network_acronym_str |
2304-5132 |
| repository_id_str |
. |
| network_name_str |
Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia |
| spelling |
Evaluation of the use of intrauterine device Lipper as a method of family planningEvaluación del uso del dispositivo intrauterino de Lipper como método de planificación familiarVicuña Ríos, JuanKesseru Koos, EstebanLarrañaga Leguía, AlfredoThe results of using large Lippes Loop in 436 patients from a Family Planning Center of Lima are presented. 5.384 months of use were tabulated. 10 unintended pregnancies (failure rate 2.21) two of them were seen unnoticed IUD expulsion The main adverse effects were vaginal discharge, pelvic pain and vaginal bleeding; the incidence of expulsions was lower than that reported in the publications. It has removed the D.I.U. by pelvic infection in 1.4% of patients. Has not been observed uterine perforation, IUD translocation or malignancy of exfoliative cytology. With an average of 12.4 months using woman there, a dropout rate of 38.8%. These results are discussed in comparison with international experiences. Finally statistical data showing that the motivation of the patient by the method increases with age and parity, parallel however increase the incidence of undesirable effects thereof are presented.Se presentan los resultados del uso del asa grande de Lippes en 436 pacientes de un Centro de Planificación Familiar de Lima. Se tabularon 5,384 meses de uso. Se observaron 10 embarazos involuntarios (tasa de fracasos 2.21) dos de ellos con expulsión inadvertida del D.I.U. Los principales efectos indeseables fueron la leucorrea, el dolor pélvico y la metrorragia; la incidencia de expulsiones fue menor de lo referido en las publicaciones al respecto. Se ha extraído el D.I.U. por infección pélvica en 1.4 % de las pacientes. No se ha observado perforación uterina, translocación del D.I.U. ni malignización de la citología exfoliativa. Con un promedio de uso de 12.4 meses mujer existe, una tasa de abandonos del 38.8%. Se comentan estos resultados en comparación con las experiencias internacionales. Finalmente se presentan datos estadísticos que demuestran que la motivación de las pacientes por el método aumenta con su edad y paridad, no obstante incrementar paralelamente la incidencia de efectos indeseables del mismo.Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología2015-06-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/80810.31403/rpgo.v16i808Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 16, Núm. 2 (1970); 101-1262304-51322304-5124reponame:Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetriciainstname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecologíainstacron:SPOGspahttp://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/808/767info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-05-31T15:51:44Zmail@mail.com - |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of the use of intrauterine device Lipper as a method of family planning Evaluación del uso del dispositivo intrauterino de Lipper como método de planificación familiar |
| title |
Evaluation of the use of intrauterine device Lipper as a method of family planning |
| spellingShingle |
Evaluation of the use of intrauterine device Lipper as a method of family planning Vicuña Ríos, Juan |
| title_short |
Evaluation of the use of intrauterine device Lipper as a method of family planning |
| title_full |
Evaluation of the use of intrauterine device Lipper as a method of family planning |
| title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the use of intrauterine device Lipper as a method of family planning |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the use of intrauterine device Lipper as a method of family planning |
| title_sort |
Evaluation of the use of intrauterine device Lipper as a method of family planning |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Vicuña Ríos, Juan Kesseru Koos, Esteban Larrañaga Leguía, Alfredo |
| author |
Vicuña Ríos, Juan |
| author_facet |
Vicuña Ríos, Juan Kesseru Koos, Esteban Larrañaga Leguía, Alfredo |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Kesseru Koos, Esteban Larrañaga Leguía, Alfredo |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The results of using large Lippes Loop in 436 patients from a Family Planning Center of Lima are presented. 5.384 months of use were tabulated. 10 unintended pregnancies (failure rate 2.21) two of them were seen unnoticed IUD expulsion The main adverse effects were vaginal discharge, pelvic pain and vaginal bleeding; the incidence of expulsions was lower than that reported in the publications. It has removed the D.I.U. by pelvic infection in 1.4% of patients. Has not been observed uterine perforation, IUD translocation or malignancy of exfoliative cytology. With an average of 12.4 months using woman there, a dropout rate of 38.8%. These results are discussed in comparison with international experiences. Finally statistical data showing that the motivation of the patient by the method increases with age and parity, parallel however increase the incidence of undesirable effects thereof are presented. Se presentan los resultados del uso del asa grande de Lippes en 436 pacientes de un Centro de Planificación Familiar de Lima. Se tabularon 5,384 meses de uso. Se observaron 10 embarazos involuntarios (tasa de fracasos 2.21) dos de ellos con expulsión inadvertida del D.I.U. Los principales efectos indeseables fueron la leucorrea, el dolor pélvico y la metrorragia; la incidencia de expulsiones fue menor de lo referido en las publicaciones al respecto. Se ha extraído el D.I.U. por infección pélvica en 1.4 % de las pacientes. No se ha observado perforación uterina, translocación del D.I.U. ni malignización de la citología exfoliativa. Con un promedio de uso de 12.4 meses mujer existe, una tasa de abandonos del 38.8%. Se comentan estos resultados en comparación con las experiencias internacionales. Finalmente se presentan datos estadísticos que demuestran que la motivación de las pacientes por el método aumenta con su edad y paridad, no obstante incrementar paralelamente la incidencia de efectos indeseables del mismo. |
| description |
The results of using large Lippes Loop in 436 patients from a Family Planning Center of Lima are presented. 5.384 months of use were tabulated. 10 unintended pregnancies (failure rate 2.21) two of them were seen unnoticed IUD expulsion The main adverse effects were vaginal discharge, pelvic pain and vaginal bleeding; the incidence of expulsions was lower than that reported in the publications. It has removed the D.I.U. by pelvic infection in 1.4% of patients. Has not been observed uterine perforation, IUD translocation or malignancy of exfoliative cytology. With an average of 12.4 months using woman there, a dropout rate of 38.8%. These results are discussed in comparison with international experiences. Finally statistical data showing that the motivation of the patient by the method increases with age and parity, parallel however increase the incidence of undesirable effects thereof are presented. |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-06-10 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/808 10.31403/rpgo.v16i808 |
| url |
http://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/808 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.31403/rpgo.v16i808 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/808/767 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia; Vol. 16, Núm. 2 (1970); 101-126 2304-5132 2304-5124 reponame:Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia instname:Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología instacron:SPOG |
| reponame_str |
Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia |
| collection |
Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia |
| instname_str |
Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología |
| instacron_str |
SPOG |
| institution |
SPOG |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
-
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mail@mail.com |
| _version_ |
1701289837729939456 |
| score |
13.924177 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).