Reliability of post natal gestational assessment: Capurro test compared with ultrasound at 10+0 to 14+2 weeks of gestation
Descripción del Articulo
Objective: To compare gestational age assessed by Capurro test versus the gold standard, the first trimester ultrasound (10+0 to 14+2 weeks) in women with reliable last menstrual period. Design: Retrospective and correlation study. Setting: Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal, Lima, Perú. Participa...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2015 |
| Institución: | Sociedad Peruana de Obstetricia y Ginecología |
| Repositorio: | Revista SPOG - Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia |
| Lenguaje: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ojs.spog:article/1833 |
| Enlace del recurso: | http://www.spog.org.pe/web/revista/index.php/RPGO/article/view/1833 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| Sumario: | Objective: To compare gestational age assessed by Capurro test versus the gold standard, the first trimester ultrasound (10+0 to 14+2 weeks) in women with reliable last menstrual period. Design: Retrospective and correlation study. Setting: Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal, Lima, Perú. Participants: Fetuses and the same once born. Methods: Ultrasound study was performed to 167 pregnant women at 10+0 to 14+2 weeks of gestation during the period 2005 through 2009; gestational age at birth of fetuses calculated by ultrasound was compared with gestational age by Capurro test. Main outcome measures: Comparison of medians of Wilcoxon test, interclass correlation coefficient, Lin’s coefficient concordance correlation, Bland & Altman’s graphic limits of agreement. Results: Mean gestational age assessed by Capurro test was 39 weeks versus 38 weeks determined by the crown rump length (Wilcoxon test z=-3.88, P<0.01). The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.67 (95%CI: 0.58-0.75), the Lin’s coefficient concordance correlation was 0.65 (95%CI: 0.55-0.72), and the Bland & Altman limits of agreement was -0.41 (95%LOA -2.9-2.1). Conclusions: Gestational age assessment by Capurro test tended to overestimate age. The relation between these two methods was not perfect as measurements were different. |
|---|
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).