Corporate governance in sustainability indexes: a Spanish case study
Descripción del Articulo
In recent years, corporate governance and corporate social responsibility have come closer in academic research, and especially on sustainability indexes. In fact, the most significant indexes handle the matter of corporate governance along with other environmental and social criteria. The purpose o...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de Publicación: | 2020 |
| Institución: | Universidad de Piura |
| Repositorio: | Revista UDEP - Revista de Comunicación |
| Lenguaje: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.udep.edu.pe:article/1929 |
| Enlace del recurso: | https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/1929 |
| Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
| id |
2227-1465_cef96108bd8c6522990b111a3c60ab7f |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.udep.edu.pe:article/1929 |
| network_acronym_str |
2227-1465 |
| repository_id_str |
|
| network_name_str |
Revista UDEP - Revista de Comunicación |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Corporate governance in sustainability indexes: a Spanish case study El gobierno corporativo en los índices de sostenibilidad: un estudio de caso español |
| title |
Corporate governance in sustainability indexes: a Spanish case study |
| spellingShingle |
Corporate governance in sustainability indexes: a Spanish case study Andreu-Pinillos, Alberto |
| title_short |
Corporate governance in sustainability indexes: a Spanish case study |
| title_full |
Corporate governance in sustainability indexes: a Spanish case study |
| title_fullStr |
Corporate governance in sustainability indexes: a Spanish case study |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Corporate governance in sustainability indexes: a Spanish case study |
| title_sort |
Corporate governance in sustainability indexes: a Spanish case study |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Andreu-Pinillos, Alberto Fernández-Fernández, José-Luis Fernández-Mateo, Joaquín |
| author |
Andreu-Pinillos, Alberto |
| author_facet |
Andreu-Pinillos, Alberto Fernández-Fernández, José-Luis Fernández-Mateo, Joaquín |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Fernández-Fernández, José-Luis Fernández-Mateo, Joaquín |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
In recent years, corporate governance and corporate social responsibility have come closer in academic research, and especially on sustainability indexes. In fact, the most significant indexes handle the matter of corporate governance along with other environmental and social criteria. The purpose of this study is to find out if all the variables included in the corporate governance dimension on the above mentioned indicators are equally relevant and material for both corporate social responsability and corporate governance. To carry out the study, a sample of academics and professionals from Spanish universities and businesses sector was taken. We defend the plausible hypothesis that not all items included within corporate governance dimension on sustainability indexes are homogeneous and interchangeable and, therefore, equally relevant. As a result, the measurements provided by these indexes may not be truly representative. En los últimos años, el gobierno corporativo y la responsabilidad social de las empresas se han acercado en la investigación académica, y especialmente en los índices de sostenibilidad. De hecho, los índices más importantes tratan la cuestión del gobierno corporativo junto con otros criterios ambientales y sociales. El propósito de este estudio es descubrir si todas las variables incluidas en la dimensión gobierno corporativo de los índices mencionados son igualmente relevantes y materiales tanto para la responsabilidad social de las empresas como para el gobierno corporativo. Para llevar a cabo el estudio, se ha tomado una muestra de académicos y profesionales del ámbito universitario y empresarial español. Defendemos la hipótesis plausible de que no todos los elementos incluidos en la dimensión gobierno corporativo de los índices de sostenibilidad son homogéneos e intercambiables y, por lo tanto, igualmente relevantes. Como consecuencia, las mediciones que proporcionan estos índices pueden no ser verdaderamente representativas. |
| description |
In recent years, corporate governance and corporate social responsibility have come closer in academic research, and especially on sustainability indexes. In fact, the most significant indexes handle the matter of corporate governance along with other environmental and social criteria. The purpose of this study is to find out if all the variables included in the corporate governance dimension on the above mentioned indicators are equally relevant and material for both corporate social responsability and corporate governance. To carry out the study, a sample of academics and professionals from Spanish universities and businesses sector was taken. We defend the plausible hypothesis that not all items included within corporate governance dimension on sustainability indexes are homogeneous and interchangeable and, therefore, equally relevant. As a result, the measurements provided by these indexes may not be truly representative. |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-11 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Article evaluated by pairs text Artículo evaluado por pares texto |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/1929 10.26441/RC19.2-2020-A1 |
| url |
https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/1929 |
| identifier_str_mv |
10.26441/RC19.2-2020-A1 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/1929/1602 https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/1929/1609 https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/1929/1612 /*ref*/Adam, A. M. y Shavit, T. (2008) How can a ratings-based method for assessing corporate social responsibility (CSR) provide an incentive to firms excluded from socially responsible investment indexes to invest in CSR? Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 899-905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9600-4 /*ref*/Aguilera, R. V., Williams, C. A., Conley, J. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2006). Corporate governance and social responsibility: A comparative analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance: an international review, 14(3), 147-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00495.x /*ref*/Andreu, A. (2017). Revisión crítica de la dimensión “Gobierno Corporativo” en los Índices de Sostenibilidad: análisis del ejercicio de la responsabilidad del Consejo de Administración en materia de RSC en las compañías del Ibex 35 español. Tesis doctoral. Madrid. Universidad Pontificia Comillas. /*ref*/Andreu, A., Fernández, J. L., & Fernández, J. (2018). Revisión crítica de la dimensión Gobierno Corporativo en los cuestionarios de los Índices de Sostenibilidad. Revista de Comunicación, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.26441/rc17.2-2018-a1 /*ref*/Avetisyan, E., & Hockerts, K. (2017). The consolidation of the ESG rating industry as an enactment of institutional retrogression. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 316-330. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1919 /*ref*/Baas, R. B., Georgakopoulos, G., Vasileiou, K. Z., & Sotiropoulos, I. (2016). An Investigation of Corporate Sustainability Value to Investors Before and After the Financial Crisis. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 8(6), 37. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v8n6p37 /*ref*/Barreiro-Gen, M., Lozano, R., & Zafar, A. (2020). Changes in Sustainability Priorities in Organisations due to the COVID-19 Outbreak: Averting Environmental Rebound Effects on Society. Sustainability, 12(12), 5031. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125031 /*ref*/Beloe, S., Scherer, J., & Knoepfel, I. (2004). Values for money: reviewing the quality of SRI research. SustainAbility. http://sustainability.com/our-work/reports/values-for-money/ /*ref*/Beltratti, A. (2005). The complementarity between corporate governance and corporate social responsibility. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 30(3), 373-386. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.gpp.2510035 /*ref*/Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. England. Penguin Books. /*ref*/Bird, F. (2001). Good governance: A philosophical discussion of the responsibilities and practices of organizational governors. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 18(4), 298-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2001.tb00265.x /*ref*/BlackRock (2016). “Exploring ESG: A Practitioner’s Perspective”. September 2016. Black Rock. https://www.blackrock.com/investing/literature/whitepaper/viewpoint-exploring-esg-a-practitioners-perspective-june-2016.pdf /*ref*/Blair, M. M. (1996). Ownership and control: Rethinking corporate governance for the twenty-first century. Long Range Planning, 3 (29), 432. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(96)90031-X /*ref*/Boghossian, P. (2007). Fear of knowledge: Against relativism and constructivism. Oxford. Oxford University Press. /*ref*/Chan, M. C., Watson, J., & Woodliff, D. (2014). Corporate governance quality and CSR disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(1), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1887-8 /*ref*/Chatterji, A. K., Levine, D. I., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(1), 125-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00210.x /*ref*/CNMV (2015). Código de buen gobierno de las sociedades cotizadas. Comision Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV). https://www.cnmv.es/docportal/publicaciones/codigogov/codigo_buen_gobierno.pdf /*ref*/Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 15(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.132 /*ref*/De la Cuesta, González, M., Pardo, E., & Paredes, J. D. (2015). Identificación de indicadores relevantes del desempeño RSE mediante la utilización de técnicas multicriterio. Innovar, 25(55), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v25n55.47197 /*ref*/Delmas, M., & Blass, V. D. (2010). Measuring corporate environmental performance: the trade‐offs of sustainability ratings. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.676 /*ref*/Donker, H., & Zahir, S. (2008). Towards an impartial and effective corporate governance rating system. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 8(1), 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700810853428 /*ref*/Doyle, T. (2018) Ratings that don´t rate. The subjective world of ESG ratings agencies. American Council for Capital Formation. http://accf.org/2018/07/19/ratings-that-dont-rate-the-subjective-world-of-esg-ratings-agencies/ /*ref*/Eccles, R. G., Krzus, M. P., Rogers, J., & Serafeim, G. (2012). The need for sector‐specific materiality and sustainability reporting standards. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 24(2), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2012.00380.x /*ref*/Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857. https://doi.org/10.3386/w17950 /*ref*/Eccles, R. G., & Youmans, T. (2016). Materiality in corporate governance: The statement of significant audiences and materiality. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12173 /*ref*/Elkington, J. (2006), ‘‘Governance for sustainability’’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 14 No. 6, pp. 522-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00527.x /*ref*/Epstein, E. M. (2002). Religion and business–the critical role of religious traditions in management education. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(1-2), 91-96. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015712827640 /*ref*/Escrig, E., Fernández, M. A., & Muñoz, J. M. (2010). Socially responsible investing: sustainability indexes, ESG rating and information provider agencies. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 2(4), 442-461. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijse.2010.035490 /*ref*/Escrig-Olmedo, E., Muñoz-Torres, M. J., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. Á., & Rivera-Lirio, J. M. (2014). Lights and shadows on sustainability rating scoring. Review of Managerial Science, 8(4), 559-574. 10.1007/s11846-013-0118-0 /*ref*/Escrig-Olmedo, E., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. Á., Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Rivera-Lirio, J. M., & Muñoz-Torres, M. J. (2019). Rating the raters: Evaluating how ESG rating agencies integrate sustainability principles. Sustainability, 11(3), 915. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030915 /*ref*/Fernández Mateo, J. (2019). Los fundamentos epistemológicos de la transformación digital y sus efectos sobre la Agenda 2030 y los derechos humanos. Revista Icade. Revista de las Facultades de Derecho y Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, (108). doi: https://doi.org/10.14422/icade.i108.y2019.004. /*ref*/Fernández-Mateo, J & Franco-Barrera, A. J. (2020) Animal Welfare for Corporate Sustainability: The Business Benchmark on Farm Animal Welfare. Journal of Sustainability Research, 2(3) https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20200030 /*ref*/Fowler, S. J., & Hope, C. (2007). A critical review of sustainable business indexes and their impact. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(3), 243-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9590-2 /*ref*/Friede, G., Busch, T. & Bassen, A. (2015) ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies, Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5:4, 210-233, https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917 /*ref*/Gladwin, T. N., Kennelly, J. J., & Krause, T. S. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of management Review, 20(4), 874-907. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280024 /*ref*/Graafland, J. J., Eijffinger, S. C., & SmidJohan, H. (2004). Benchmarking of corporate social responsibility: Methodological problems and robustness. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1-2), 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:busi.0000039404.67854.e1 /*ref*/Hadani, M., Doh, J. P., & Schneider, M. A. (2018). Corporate political activity and regulatory capture: how some companies blunt the knife of socially oriented investor activism. Journal of Management, 44(5), 2064-2093. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316638162 /*ref*/Harjoto, M. A. & Jo, H. (2011). Corporate governance and CSR nexus. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0772-6 /*ref*/Huang, C. J. (2010). Corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and corporate performance. Journal of management & organization, 16(5), 641-655. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2010.16.5.641 /*ref*/Jackson, G., & Apostolakou, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: an institutional mirror or substitute? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 371-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0269-8 /*ref*/Jamali, D., Safieddine, A. M., & Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 443-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00702.x /*ref*/Jensen, K. B. (Ed.). (2013). A handbook of media and communication research: Qualitative and quantitative methodologies. London and New York. Routledge. /*ref*/Jo, H. & Harjoto, M. A. (2012). The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 106(1), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1052-1 /*ref*/Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The accounting review, 91(6), 1697-1724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51383 /*ref*/Kleine, A., & Von Hauff, M. (2009). Sustainability-driven implementation of corporate social responsibility: Application of the integrative sustainability triangle. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(3), 517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0212-z /*ref*/Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2010). The integration of corporate governance in corporate social responsibility disclosures. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 17(1), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.196 /*ref*/Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology, nº 140. /*ref*/Lo, S.F., & Sheu, H.J. (2007). Is corporate sustain- ability a value-increasing strategy for business? Corporate Governance, 15, 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00565.x /*ref*/López, M. V., Garcia, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones sustainability index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(3), 285–300.: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9253-8 /*ref*/Mahoney, L. S., Thorne, L., Cecil, L., & LaGore, W. (2013). A research note on standalone corporate social responsibility reports: Signaling or greenwashing?. Critical perspectives on Accounting, 24(4-5), 350-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.09.008 /*ref*/Melé, D. (2009). Integrating personalism into virtue-based business ethics: The personalist and the common good principles. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 227-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0108-y /*ref*/Money, K., & Schepers, H. (2007). Are CSR and corporate governance converging? A view from boardroom directors and company secretaries in FTSE100 companies in the UK. Journal of General Management, 33(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/030630700703300201 /*ref*/Montiel, I. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability: Separate pasts, common futures. Organization & Environment, 21(3), 245-269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026608321329 /*ref*/Montiel, I., Gallo, P. J., & Antolin-Lopez, R. (2020). What on Earth should managers learn about corporate sustainability? A threshold concept approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(4), 857-880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04361-y /*ref*/Moreira, P. G. (Ed.). (2020). Revisiting Richard Rorty. Vernon Press. /*ref*/OECD (2016). G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance: OECD Report to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/Corporate-Governance-Principles-ENG.pdf /*ref*/Parguel, B., Benoît-Moreau, F., & Larceneux, F. (2011). How sustainability ratings might deter ‘greenwashing’: A closer look at ethical corporate communication. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0901-2 /*ref*/Ricart, J. E., Rodríguez, M. A., & Sánchez, P. (2005). Sustainability in the boardroom: An empirical examination of Dow Jones Sustainability World Index leaders. Corporate Governance: the international journal of business in society, 5(3), 24-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700510604670 /*ref*/Rodriguez-Fernández, M. (2016). Social responsibility and financial performance: The role of good corporate governance. Business Research Quarterly, 19(2), 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2015.08.001 /*ref*/Rossouw, G. J. (2012). Global business ethical perspectives on capitalism, finance and corporate responsibility: the impact of the global financial crisis of 2008. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 1(1), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-011-0006-0 /*ref*/Rorty, R. (2007). Philosophy as Cultural Politics: Volume 4. Philosophical Papers. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. /*ref*/Rubino, F., & Napoli, F. (2020). What Impact Does Corporate Governance Have on Corporate Environmental Performances. An Empirical Study of Italian Listed Firms. Sustainability, 12(14), 5742. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145742 /*ref*/Schäfer, H. (2005). International Corporate Social Responsibility Rating Systems. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, (20). https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2005.wi.00012 /*ref*/Searcy, C., & Elkhawas, D. (2012). Corporate sustainability ratings: an investigation into how corporations use the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Cleaner Production, 35, 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.022 /*ref*/Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The journal of finance, 52(2), 737-783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x /*ref*/Shu, P. G., & Chiang, S. J. (2020). The impact of corporate governance on corporate social performance: Cases from listed firms in Taiwan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 101332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101332 /*ref*/Solomon, R. C. (1998). The moral psychology of business: Care and compassion in the corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 515-533. /*ref*/Spitzeck, H. (2009). The development of governance structures for corporate responsibility. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 9(4), 495-505. https://doi. org/10.1108/14720700910985034 /*ref*/Sun, M., Nagata, K., & Onoda, H. (2011). The investigation of the current status of socially responsible investment indexes. Journal of Economics and International Finance, 3(13), 676. /*ref*/Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 95–105. https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1023331212247 /*ref*/Vázquez, O. (2020). La RSC en las memorias anuales de las empresas del IBEX-35: análisis del ejercicio 2018. Observatorio de la Responsabilidad Social Corporativa. https://observatoriorsc.org/la-responsabilidad-social-corporativa-en-las-memorias-anuales-de-las-empresas-del-ibex-35/ Vitell, S. J. (2009). The role of religiosity in business and consumer ethics: A review of the literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 155-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0382-8 /*ref*/Wines, W. A. (2008). Seven pillars of business ethics: Toward a comprehensive framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(4), 483-499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9411-7 /*ref*/Windolph, S. E. (2011). Assessing corporate sustainability through ratings: challenges and their causes. Journal of Environmental sustainability, 1(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.14448/jes.01.0005 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2020 Revista de Comunicación http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2020 Revista de Comunicación http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html application/xml |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Piura. Facultad de Comunicación |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Piura. Facultad de Comunicación |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Comunicación; Vol 19 No 2 (2020); 7-28 Revista de Comunicación; Vol. 19 Núm. 2 (2020); 7-28 2227-1465 1684-0933 reponame:Revista UDEP - Revista de Comunicación instname:Universidad de Piura instacron:UDEP |
| reponame_str |
Revista UDEP - Revista de Comunicación |
| collection |
Revista UDEP - Revista de Comunicación |
| instname_str |
Universidad de Piura |
| instacron_str |
UDEP |
| institution |
UDEP |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
-
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mail@mail.com |
| _version_ |
1701295319886594048 |
| spelling |
Corporate governance in sustainability indexes: a Spanish case studyEl gobierno corporativo en los índices de sostenibilidad: un estudio de caso españolAndreu-Pinillos, AlbertoFernández-Fernández, José-LuisFernández-Mateo, JoaquínIn recent years, corporate governance and corporate social responsibility have come closer in academic research, and especially on sustainability indexes. In fact, the most significant indexes handle the matter of corporate governance along with other environmental and social criteria. The purpose of this study is to find out if all the variables included in the corporate governance dimension on the above mentioned indicators are equally relevant and material for both corporate social responsability and corporate governance. To carry out the study, a sample of academics and professionals from Spanish universities and businesses sector was taken. We defend the plausible hypothesis that not all items included within corporate governance dimension on sustainability indexes are homogeneous and interchangeable and, therefore, equally relevant. As a result, the measurements provided by these indexes may not be truly representative.En los últimos años, el gobierno corporativo y la responsabilidad social de las empresas se han acercado en la investigación académica, y especialmente en los índices de sostenibilidad. De hecho, los índices más importantes tratan la cuestión del gobierno corporativo junto con otros criterios ambientales y sociales. El propósito de este estudio es descubrir si todas las variables incluidas en la dimensión gobierno corporativo de los índices mencionados son igualmente relevantes y materiales tanto para la responsabilidad social de las empresas como para el gobierno corporativo. Para llevar a cabo el estudio, se ha tomado una muestra de académicos y profesionales del ámbito universitario y empresarial español. Defendemos la hipótesis plausible de que no todos los elementos incluidos en la dimensión gobierno corporativo de los índices de sostenibilidad son homogéneos e intercambiables y, por lo tanto, igualmente relevantes. Como consecuencia, las mediciones que proporcionan estos índices pueden no ser verdaderamente representativas.Universidad de Piura. Facultad de Comunicación2020-09-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticle evaluated by pairstextArtículo evaluado por parestextoapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/xmlhttps://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/192910.26441/RC19.2-2020-A1Revista de Comunicación; Vol 19 No 2 (2020); 7-28Revista de Comunicación; Vol. 19 Núm. 2 (2020); 7-282227-14651684-0933reponame:Revista UDEP - Revista de Comunicacióninstname:Universidad de Piurainstacron:UDEPenghttps://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/1929/1602https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/1929/1609https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/1929/1612/*ref*/Adam, A. M. y Shavit, T. (2008) How can a ratings-based method for assessing corporate social responsibility (CSR) provide an incentive to firms excluded from socially responsible investment indexes to invest in CSR? Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 899-905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9600-4/*ref*/Aguilera, R. V., Williams, C. A., Conley, J. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2006). Corporate governance and social responsibility: A comparative analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance: an international review, 14(3), 147-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00495.x/*ref*/Andreu, A. (2017). Revisión crítica de la dimensión “Gobierno Corporativo” en los Índices de Sostenibilidad: análisis del ejercicio de la responsabilidad del Consejo de Administración en materia de RSC en las compañías del Ibex 35 español. Tesis doctoral. Madrid. Universidad Pontificia Comillas./*ref*/Andreu, A., Fernández, J. L., & Fernández, J. (2018). Revisión crítica de la dimensión Gobierno Corporativo en los cuestionarios de los Índices de Sostenibilidad. Revista de Comunicación, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.26441/rc17.2-2018-a1/*ref*/Avetisyan, E., & Hockerts, K. (2017). The consolidation of the ESG rating industry as an enactment of institutional retrogression. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 316-330. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1919/*ref*/Baas, R. B., Georgakopoulos, G., Vasileiou, K. Z., & Sotiropoulos, I. (2016). An Investigation of Corporate Sustainability Value to Investors Before and After the Financial Crisis. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 8(6), 37. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v8n6p37/*ref*/Barreiro-Gen, M., Lozano, R., & Zafar, A. (2020). Changes in Sustainability Priorities in Organisations due to the COVID-19 Outbreak: Averting Environmental Rebound Effects on Society. Sustainability, 12(12), 5031. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125031/*ref*/Beloe, S., Scherer, J., & Knoepfel, I. (2004). Values for money: reviewing the quality of SRI research. SustainAbility. http://sustainability.com/our-work/reports/values-for-money//*ref*/Beltratti, A. (2005). The complementarity between corporate governance and corporate social responsibility. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 30(3), 373-386. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.gpp.2510035/*ref*/Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. England. Penguin Books./*ref*/Bird, F. (2001). Good governance: A philosophical discussion of the responsibilities and practices of organizational governors. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 18(4), 298-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2001.tb00265.x/*ref*/BlackRock (2016). “Exploring ESG: A Practitioner’s Perspective”. September 2016. Black Rock. https://www.blackrock.com/investing/literature/whitepaper/viewpoint-exploring-esg-a-practitioners-perspective-june-2016.pdf/*ref*/Blair, M. M. (1996). Ownership and control: Rethinking corporate governance for the twenty-first century. Long Range Planning, 3 (29), 432. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(96)90031-X/*ref*/Boghossian, P. (2007). Fear of knowledge: Against relativism and constructivism. Oxford. Oxford University Press./*ref*/Chan, M. C., Watson, J., & Woodliff, D. (2014). Corporate governance quality and CSR disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(1), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1887-8/*ref*/Chatterji, A. K., Levine, D. I., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(1), 125-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2009.00210.x/*ref*/CNMV (2015). Código de buen gobierno de las sociedades cotizadas. Comision Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV). https://www.cnmv.es/docportal/publicaciones/codigogov/codigo_buen_gobierno.pdf/*ref*/Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 15(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.132/*ref*/De la Cuesta, González, M., Pardo, E., & Paredes, J. D. (2015). Identificación de indicadores relevantes del desempeño RSE mediante la utilización de técnicas multicriterio. Innovar, 25(55), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v25n55.47197/*ref*/Delmas, M., & Blass, V. D. (2010). Measuring corporate environmental performance: the trade‐offs of sustainability ratings. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(4), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.676/*ref*/Donker, H., & Zahir, S. (2008). Towards an impartial and effective corporate governance rating system. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 8(1), 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700810853428/*ref*/Doyle, T. (2018) Ratings that don´t rate. The subjective world of ESG ratings agencies. American Council for Capital Formation. http://accf.org/2018/07/19/ratings-that-dont-rate-the-subjective-world-of-esg-ratings-agencies//*ref*/Eccles, R. G., Krzus, M. P., Rogers, J., & Serafeim, G. (2012). The need for sector‐specific materiality and sustainability reporting standards. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 24(2), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2012.00380.x/*ref*/Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857. https://doi.org/10.3386/w17950/*ref*/Eccles, R. G., & Youmans, T. (2016). Materiality in corporate governance: The statement of significant audiences and materiality. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12173/*ref*/Elkington, J. (2006), ‘‘Governance for sustainability’’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 14 No. 6, pp. 522-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00527.x/*ref*/Epstein, E. M. (2002). Religion and business–the critical role of religious traditions in management education. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(1-2), 91-96. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015712827640/*ref*/Escrig, E., Fernández, M. A., & Muñoz, J. M. (2010). Socially responsible investing: sustainability indexes, ESG rating and information provider agencies. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 2(4), 442-461. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijse.2010.035490/*ref*/Escrig-Olmedo, E., Muñoz-Torres, M. J., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. Á., & Rivera-Lirio, J. M. (2014). Lights and shadows on sustainability rating scoring. Review of Managerial Science, 8(4), 559-574. 10.1007/s11846-013-0118-0/*ref*/Escrig-Olmedo, E., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. Á., Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Rivera-Lirio, J. M., & Muñoz-Torres, M. J. (2019). Rating the raters: Evaluating how ESG rating agencies integrate sustainability principles. Sustainability, 11(3), 915. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030915/*ref*/Fernández Mateo, J. (2019). Los fundamentos epistemológicos de la transformación digital y sus efectos sobre la Agenda 2030 y los derechos humanos. Revista Icade. Revista de las Facultades de Derecho y Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, (108). doi: https://doi.org/10.14422/icade.i108.y2019.004./*ref*/Fernández-Mateo, J & Franco-Barrera, A. J. (2020) Animal Welfare for Corporate Sustainability: The Business Benchmark on Farm Animal Welfare. Journal of Sustainability Research, 2(3) https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20200030/*ref*/Fowler, S. J., & Hope, C. (2007). A critical review of sustainable business indexes and their impact. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(3), 243-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9590-2/*ref*/Friede, G., Busch, T. & Bassen, A. (2015) ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies, Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5:4, 210-233, https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917/*ref*/Gladwin, T. N., Kennelly, J. J., & Krause, T. S. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of management Review, 20(4), 874-907. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280024/*ref*/Graafland, J. J., Eijffinger, S. C., & SmidJohan, H. (2004). Benchmarking of corporate social responsibility: Methodological problems and robustness. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1-2), 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:busi.0000039404.67854.e1/*ref*/Hadani, M., Doh, J. P., & Schneider, M. A. (2018). Corporate political activity and regulatory capture: how some companies blunt the knife of socially oriented investor activism. Journal of Management, 44(5), 2064-2093. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316638162/*ref*/Harjoto, M. A. & Jo, H. (2011). Corporate governance and CSR nexus. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0772-6/*ref*/Huang, C. J. (2010). Corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and corporate performance. Journal of management & organization, 16(5), 641-655. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2010.16.5.641/*ref*/Jackson, G., & Apostolakou, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: an institutional mirror or substitute? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 371-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0269-8/*ref*/Jamali, D., Safieddine, A. M., & Rabbath, M. (2008). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(5), 443-459. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00702.x/*ref*/Jensen, K. B. (Ed.). (2013). A handbook of media and communication research: Qualitative and quantitative methodologies. London and New York. Routledge./*ref*/Jo, H. & Harjoto, M. A. (2012). The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 106(1), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1052-1/*ref*/Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The accounting review, 91(6), 1697-1724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51383/*ref*/Kleine, A., & Von Hauff, M. (2009). Sustainability-driven implementation of corporate social responsibility: Application of the integrative sustainability triangle. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(3), 517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0212-z/*ref*/Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2010). The integration of corporate governance in corporate social responsibility disclosures. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 17(1), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.196/*ref*/Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology, nº 140./*ref*/Lo, S.F., & Sheu, H.J. (2007). Is corporate sustain- ability a value-increasing strategy for business? Corporate Governance, 15, 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00565.x/*ref*/López, M. V., Garcia, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones sustainability index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(3), 285–300.: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9253-8/*ref*/Mahoney, L. S., Thorne, L., Cecil, L., & LaGore, W. (2013). A research note on standalone corporate social responsibility reports: Signaling or greenwashing?. Critical perspectives on Accounting, 24(4-5), 350-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.09.008/*ref*/Melé, D. (2009). Integrating personalism into virtue-based business ethics: The personalist and the common good principles. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 227-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0108-y/*ref*/Money, K., & Schepers, H. (2007). Are CSR and corporate governance converging? A view from boardroom directors and company secretaries in FTSE100 companies in the UK. Journal of General Management, 33(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/030630700703300201/*ref*/Montiel, I. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability: Separate pasts, common futures. Organization & Environment, 21(3), 245-269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026608321329/*ref*/Montiel, I., Gallo, P. J., & Antolin-Lopez, R. (2020). What on Earth should managers learn about corporate sustainability? A threshold concept approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(4), 857-880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04361-y/*ref*/Moreira, P. G. (Ed.). (2020). Revisiting Richard Rorty. Vernon Press./*ref*/OECD (2016). G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance: OECD Report to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/Corporate-Governance-Principles-ENG.pdf/*ref*/Parguel, B., Benoît-Moreau, F., & Larceneux, F. (2011). How sustainability ratings might deter ‘greenwashing’: A closer look at ethical corporate communication. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0901-2/*ref*/Ricart, J. E., Rodríguez, M. A., & Sánchez, P. (2005). Sustainability in the boardroom: An empirical examination of Dow Jones Sustainability World Index leaders. Corporate Governance: the international journal of business in society, 5(3), 24-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700510604670/*ref*/Rodriguez-Fernández, M. (2016). Social responsibility and financial performance: The role of good corporate governance. Business Research Quarterly, 19(2), 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2015.08.001/*ref*/Rossouw, G. J. (2012). Global business ethical perspectives on capitalism, finance and corporate responsibility: the impact of the global financial crisis of 2008. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 1(1), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-011-0006-0/*ref*/Rorty, R. (2007). Philosophy as Cultural Politics: Volume 4. Philosophical Papers. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press./*ref*/Rubino, F., & Napoli, F. (2020). What Impact Does Corporate Governance Have on Corporate Environmental Performances. An Empirical Study of Italian Listed Firms. Sustainability, 12(14), 5742. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145742/*ref*/Schäfer, H. (2005). International Corporate Social Responsibility Rating Systems. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, (20). https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2005.wi.00012/*ref*/Searcy, C., & Elkhawas, D. (2012). Corporate sustainability ratings: an investigation into how corporations use the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Cleaner Production, 35, 79-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.022/*ref*/Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The journal of finance, 52(2), 737-783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x/*ref*/Shu, P. G., & Chiang, S. J. (2020). The impact of corporate governance on corporate social performance: Cases from listed firms in Taiwan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 101332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101332/*ref*/Solomon, R. C. (1998). The moral psychology of business: Care and compassion in the corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 515-533./*ref*/Spitzeck, H. (2009). The development of governance structures for corporate responsibility. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 9(4), 495-505. https://doi. org/10.1108/14720700910985034/*ref*/Sun, M., Nagata, K., & Onoda, H. (2011). The investigation of the current status of socially responsible investment indexes. Journal of Economics and International Finance, 3(13), 676./*ref*/Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 95–105. https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1023331212247/*ref*/Vázquez, O. (2020). La RSC en las memorias anuales de las empresas del IBEX-35: análisis del ejercicio 2018. Observatorio de la Responsabilidad Social Corporativa. https://observatoriorsc.org/la-responsabilidad-social-corporativa-en-las-memorias-anuales-de-las-empresas-del-ibex-35/ Vitell, S. J. (2009). The role of religiosity in business and consumer ethics: A review of the literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 155-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0382-8/*ref*/Wines, W. A. (2008). Seven pillars of business ethics: Toward a comprehensive framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(4), 483-499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9411-7/*ref*/Windolph, S. E. (2011). Assessing corporate sustainability through ratings: challenges and their causes. Journal of Environmental sustainability, 1(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.14448/jes.01.0005Derechos de autor 2020 Revista de Comunicaciónhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-05-31T17:20:13Zmail@mail.com - |
| score |
13.953817 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
