Evolution and trends in communication research about epidemics and pandemics at the international level
Descripción del Articulo
Communication research in times of epidemics and pandemics is an important factor in prevention, treatment and recovery. The study presented analyzes the behavior of communication research about epidemics and pandemics through the scientific production registered in the Scopus database. Indicators a...
Autores: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | artículo |
Fecha de Publicación: | 2021 |
Institución: | Universidad de Piura |
Repositorio: | Revista UDEP - Revista de Comunicación |
Lenguaje: | español |
OAI Identifier: | oai:revistas.udep.edu.pe:article/2152 |
Enlace del recurso: | https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/2152 |
Nivel de acceso: | acceso abierto |
id |
2227-1465_1e2e67e87fc5e578741941243ad07cec |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.udep.edu.pe:article/2152 |
network_acronym_str |
2227-1465 |
repository_id_str |
|
network_name_str |
Revista UDEP - Revista de Comunicación |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evolution and trends in communication research about epidemics and pandemics at the international level Evolución y tendencias de la investigación en comunicación sobre epidemias y pandemias en el ámbito internacional |
title |
Evolution and trends in communication research about epidemics and pandemics at the international level |
spellingShingle |
Evolution and trends in communication research about epidemics and pandemics at the international level Ortiz Núñez, Roelvis |
title_short |
Evolution and trends in communication research about epidemics and pandemics at the international level |
title_full |
Evolution and trends in communication research about epidemics and pandemics at the international level |
title_fullStr |
Evolution and trends in communication research about epidemics and pandemics at the international level |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evolution and trends in communication research about epidemics and pandemics at the international level |
title_sort |
Evolution and trends in communication research about epidemics and pandemics at the international level |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Ortiz Núñez, Roelvis Stable Rodríguez, Yudayly |
author |
Ortiz Núñez, Roelvis |
author_facet |
Ortiz Núñez, Roelvis Stable Rodríguez, Yudayly |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Stable Rodríguez, Yudayly |
author2_role |
author |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Communication research in times of epidemics and pandemics is an important factor in prevention, treatment and recovery. The study presented analyzes the behavior of communication research about epidemics and pandemics through the scientific production registered in the Scopus database. Indicators are used to assess general publication trends at the country, institutional, author, journal and article level. The prevailing themes and their evolution over time are examined, as well as the evolution in the groups and associated research fronts. The results show a trend towards the growth of publications with a higher concentration in 2020. The number of publications by countries, institutions, authors and journals is discrete, therefore, it is an area of knowledge that requires greater scientific research and international collaboration. Five major thematic groups, main emerging research focuses, related to health communication during epidemics, social attitudes towards health, communication during influenza A H1N1 and the COVID-19 pandemic, and epidemiological information on social networks were identified. The critical points of research in the field during the 30 years recorded in the Scopus database allow us to infer that communication about epidemics and pandemics should become the focus of research in the area of risk communication in the near future La investigación sobre comunicación en tiempos de epidemias y pandemias constituye un factor trascendental en la prevención, tratamiento y recuperación. El estudio que se presenta analiza el comportamiento de la investigación en comunicación sobre epidemias y pandemias a través de la producción científica registrada en la base de datos Scopus. Se emplean indicadores para evaluar las tendencias generales de publicación a nivel de país, instituciones, autores, revistas y artículos. Se examinan los temas preponderantes y su evolución temporal, así como, la evolución en los grupos y frentes de investigación asociados. Los resultados muestran una tendencia al crecimiento de publicaciones con una mayor concentración en el 2020. El número de publicaciones por países, instituciones, autores y revistas es discreto, por lo que, es un área de conocimientos que requiere mayor investigación científica y colaboración internacional. Se identificaron 5 grandes grupos temáticos, principales focos emergentes de investigación, relacionados con la comunicación de salud durante epidemias, las actitudes sociales hacia la salud, la comunicación durante la influenza A H1N1 y la pandemia COVID-19 y la información epidemiológica en redes sociales. Los puntos críticos de investigación en el campo durante los 30 años registrados en la base de datos Scopus permiten inferir, que la comunicación sobre epidemias y pandemias debe convertirse en foco de la investigación en el área de comunicación de riesgos en un futuro próximo. |
description |
Communication research in times of epidemics and pandemics is an important factor in prevention, treatment and recovery. The study presented analyzes the behavior of communication research about epidemics and pandemics through the scientific production registered in the Scopus database. Indicators are used to assess general publication trends at the country, institutional, author, journal and article level. The prevailing themes and their evolution over time are examined, as well as the evolution in the groups and associated research fronts. The results show a trend towards the growth of publications with a higher concentration in 2020. The number of publications by countries, institutions, authors and journals is discrete, therefore, it is an area of knowledge that requires greater scientific research and international collaboration. Five major thematic groups, main emerging research focuses, related to health communication during epidemics, social attitudes towards health, communication during influenza A H1N1 and the COVID-19 pandemic, and epidemiological information on social networks were identified. The critical points of research in the field during the 30 years recorded in the Scopus database allow us to infer that communication about epidemics and pandemics should become the focus of research in the area of risk communication in the near future |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-08 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Article evaluated by pairs text Artículo evaluado por pares texto |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/2152 10.26441/RC20.1-2021-A10 |
url |
https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/2152 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26441/RC20.1-2021-A10 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/2152/1995 https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/2152/2022 https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/2152/2023 /*ref*/Alaszewski, A., & Brown, P. (2007). Risk, uncertainty and knowledge. Health, Risk & Society, 9(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570601183033 /*ref*/Alfredo Duro, E., Angélica Sotomayor, M., Czubaj, F., Cardozo de Martínez, C.A., Cristina Gubert , I., López Dávila, L.M., Adrián Torres, F., Benites Estupiñan, E.M., Vergès de López, C., Cudeiro, P., Rueda Castro, L. & Sorokin, P. (2018). El impacto social de la comunicación en las epidemias: perspectivas bioéticas y de salud pública. Revista Iberoamericana de Bioética, 7, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.14422/rib.i07.y2018.007 /*ref*/Allahverdipour, H. (2020). Global Challenge of Health Communication: Infodemia in the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic. Journal of Education and Community Health, 7(2), 65-67. https://doi.org/10.29252/jech.7.2.65 /*ref*/Andreu-Sánchez, C. y Martín-Pascual, M. A. (2020). Fake images of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in the communication of information at the beginning of the first Covid-19 pandemic. El profesional de la información, 29(3), e290309. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.09 /*ref*/Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4):959-975. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 /*ref*/Aria, M., Misuraca, M., & Spano, M. (2020). Mapping the evolution of social research and data science on 30 years of Social Indicators Research. Social Indicators Research, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02281-3. /*ref*/Arroyave-Cabrera, J., Repiso-Caballero, R., & González-Pardo, R. (2020). La investigación en Comunicación en Colombia vista desde Web of Science. Revista de Comunicación, 19(2), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.26441/RC19.2-2020-A2 /*ref*/Ataguba, O. A. y Ataguba, J. E. (2020). Social determinants of health: the role of effective communication in the COVID-19 pandemic in developing countries. Global Health Action, 13(1):1788263. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1788263. /*ref*/Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019 /*ref*/Baladrón-Pazos, A.J., Manchado-Pérez, B., & Correyero-Ruiz, B. (2017). Estudio bibliométrico sobre la investigación en publicidad en España: temáticas, investigadores, redes y centros de producción (1980-2015). Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 40 (2): e170. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2017.2.1411 /*ref*/Bedford, J., Farrar, J., Ihekweazu, C., Kang, G., Koopmans, M., & Nkengasong, J. (2019). A new twenty-first century science for effective epidemic response. Nature 575, 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1717-y /*ref*/Bellón Saameño, J. A., & Martínez Cañabate, T. (2001). La investigación en comunicación y salud. Una perspectiva nacional e internacional desde el análisis bibliométrico [Research into communication and health. A Spanish and international perspective through bibliometric analysis]. Atencion primaria, 27(7), 452–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0212-6567(01)78835-x /*ref*/Böl, G. F. (2016). Risk communication in times of crisis: Pitfalls and challenges in ensuring preparedness instead of hysterics. EMBO reports, 17(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201541678 /*ref*/Brennan, B., & Gutiérrez, V. (2011). Guía para elaborar la estrategia de comunicación de riesgos. Washington, D.C.: OPS. http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=14526&Itemid=270&lang=en /*ref*/Budhwar, P., & Cumming, D. (2020). New Directions in Management Research and Communication: Lessons from the COVID‐19 Pandemic. British Journal of Management, 31(3):441-443. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12426 /*ref*/Burton-Jeangros, C. (2019). Epidemics and risk communication: Why are lessons not learned? Managing the global health response to epidemics. New York: Routledge. /*ref*/Castillo, A., & Carretón, M.C. (2010). Investigación en Comunicación. Estudio bibliométrico de las Revistas de Comunicación en España. Comunicación y Sociedad, 23(2), 289-327. /*ref*/Castillo, A., Peña, V., & Mañas, S. (2014). Revista de Comunicación en España. Una aproximación histórica. Historia y Comunicación Social, 19, 621-630. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_HICS.2014.v19.45053 /*ref*/Covello, V. T., Peters, R., Wojtecki, J., & Hyde, R. (2001). Risk communication, the West Nile virus epidemic, and bioterrorism: responding to the commnication challenges posed by the intentional or unintentional release of a pathogen in an urban setting. Journal of Urban Health, 78(2), 382-91. https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/78.2.382 /*ref*/Covello, V. T., & Sandman, P. M. (2001). Risk communication: evolution and revolution. In A. Wolbarst (Ed.), Solutions to an environment in peril (pp.164-178). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. /*ref*/Cummings, L. (2009). Emerging Infectious Diseases: Coping with Uncertainty. Argumentation, 23, 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-008-9116-9 /*ref*/Derviş, H. (2019). Bibliometric Analysis using Bibliometrix an R Package. Journal of Scientometric Research, 8(3), 156-160. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.8.3.32. /*ref*/De Vries, M. S. (2016). Framing crises: response patterns to explosions in fireworks factories. Administration & Society, 36(5), 594–614. https://doi.or/10.1177/0095399704268622 /*ref*/Fraustino, J. D., Liu, B. F., & Jin, Y. (2017). Social media during disasters: A research synthesis and road map. In L. Austin & Y. Jin, (Ed.), Social media and crisis communication (pp.283-295) New York, NY: Routledge. /*ref*/Freimuth, V., Linnan, H. W., & Potter, P. (2000). Communicating the threat of emerging infections to the public. Emerging infectious diseases, 6(4), 337–347. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0604.000403 /*ref*/Frewer, L. J., Hunt, S., Brennan, M., Kuznesof, S., Ness, M., & Ritson, C. (2003) The views of scientific experts on how the public conceptualize uncertainty. Journal of Risk Research, 6(1), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366987032000047815 /*ref*/Frewer, L. J., Miles, S., Brennan, M., Kuznesof, S., Ness, M., & Ritson, C. (2002). Public preferences for informed choice under conditions of risk uncertainty. Public Understanding of Science, 11(4), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/11/4/304 /*ref*/Glik, D. C. (2007). Risk communication for public health emergencies. Annual review of public health, 28, 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144123 /*ref*/Goerlandt, F.; Li, J.; & Reniers, G. (2020). The Landscape of Risk Communication Research: A Scientometric Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 3255. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093255 /*ref*/Gómez Castro, L. (2017). La comunicación de riesgo en salud: aspectos teóricos y metodológicos para el control de emergencias públicas sanitarias. MEDISAN, 21(12), 3386-3399. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1029-30192017001200013&lng=es&tlng=es. /*ref*/González, M. A. (2019). Fake News: desinformación en la era de la sociedad de la información. Ámbitos. Revista Internacional de Comunicación, 45, 29-52. https://doi.org/10.12795/Ambitos.2019.i45.03 /*ref*/Gui, X., Wang, Y., Kou, Y., Reynolds, T. L., Chen, Y., Mei, Q., & Zheng, K. (2018). Understanding the Patterns of Health Information Dissemination on Social Media during the Zika Outbreak. Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 820–829. /*ref*/Guttman, N. (2000). Public Health Communication Interventions: Values and Ethical Dilemmas. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. /*ref*/Health Protection Network. (2008). Communicating with the public about health risks. Glasgow: Health Protection Scotland. /*ref*/Holmes, B.J. (2008). Communicating aboutemerging infectious disease: the impor-tance of research. Health, Risk & Society, 10, 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570802166431 /*ref*/Horlick-Jonesa, T., & Sime, J. (2004). Living on the border: knowledge, risk and transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36(4), 441-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.006 /*ref*/Househ, M. (2016). Communicating Ebola through social media and electronic news media outlets: A cross-sectional study. Health informatics journal, 22(3), 470–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458214568037 /*ref*/Hugh Feeley, T. (2008). A Bibliometric Analysis of Communication Journals from 2002 to 2005. Human Communication Research, 34(3), 505-520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00330.x /*ref*/Jin, Y., Liu, B. F., & Austin, L. L. (2014). Examining the Role of Social Media in Effective Crisis Management: The Effects of Crisis Origin, Information Form, and Source on Publics’ Crisis Responses. Communication Research, 41(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211423918 /*ref*/Johnson, B. (1999). Ethical issues in risk communication: Continuing the discussion. Risk analysis, 19, 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00411.x /*ref*/Jones, S., Waters, L., Holland, O., Bevins, J., & Iverson, D. (2010). Developing pandemic communication strategies: preparation without panic. Journal of Business Research, 63(2), 126-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.02.009 /*ref*/Kotalik, J. (2005). Preparing for an influenza pandemic: ethical issues. Bioethics, 19(4), 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00453.x /*ref*/Laajalahti, Hyvärinen & Vos. (2016). Crisis communication competence in co-producing safety with citizen groups. Social sciences, 5(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci5010013 /*ref*/Lin, L., McCloud, R. F., Bigman, C. A., & Viswanath, K. (2016). Tuning in and catching on? Examination of the relationship between pandemic communication and awareness and knowledge of MERS in the USA. Journal of Public Health, 39(2), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdw028. /*ref*/Liwei, Z., Li, H. & Chen, K. (2020). Effective Risk Communication for Public Health Emergency: Reflection on the COVID-19 (2019-nCoV) Outbreak in Wuhan, China. Healthcare, 8(64). https:doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8010064 /*ref*/Lofstedt, R. (2003). Risk communication: pitfalls and promises. European review, 11(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1017/S106279870300036X /*ref*/Lofstedt, R. (2005). Risk Management in Post-Trust Societies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. /*ref*/Lundgren, R., & McMakin, A. (2004). Risk Communication: A Handbook for Communicating Environmental, Safety, and Health Risks. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press. /*ref*/Macias, W., Hilyard, K., & Freimuth, V. (2009). Blog functions as risk and crisis communication during hurricane Katrina. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 15(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01490.x /*ref*/Marí-Sáez, V., & Ceballos-Castro, G. (2015). Análisis bibliométrico sobre “Comunicación, Desarrollo y Cambio Social” en las diez primeras revistas de Comunicación de España. Cuadernos.Info, (37), 201-212. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.37.828 /*ref*/Mheidly, N., & Fares, J. (2020). Health communication research in the Arab world: A bibliometric analysis. Integrated Healthcare Journal, 2, e000011. https://doi.org/10.1136/ihj-2019-000011 /*ref*/Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5 /*ref*/Montero-Díaz, J., Cobo, M., Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Segado-Boj, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018). A science mapping analysis of ‘Communication’ WoS subject category (1980-2013). Comunicar, 55, 81-91. https://doi.org/10.3916/C55-2018-08 /*ref*/Moreno, Á., Fuentes-Lara, C., & Navarro, C. (2020). Covid-19 communication management in Spain: Exploring the effect of information-seeking behavior and message reception in public’s evaluation. El profesional de la información, 29(4), e290402. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.jul.02 /*ref*/Moscadelli, A., Albora, G., Biamonte, M. A., Giorgetti, D., Innocenzio, M., Paoli, S., Lorini, C., Bonanni, P., & Bonaccorsi, G. (2020). Fake News and Covid-19 in Italy: Results of a Quantitative Observational Study. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(16), 5850. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165850 /*ref*/National Research Council (US). (1989). Committee on Risk Perception and Communication. Improving Risk Comunication. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press (US). /*ref*/Oh, S. H., Paek, H. J., & Hove, T. (2015). Cognitive and emotional dimensions of perceived risk characteristics, genre-specific media effects, and risk perceptions: The case of H1N1 influenza in South Korea. Asian Journal of Communication, 25, 14–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2014.989240 /*ref*/Ophir, Y. (2018). Coverage of Epidemics in American Newspapers Through the Lens of the Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication Framework. Health security, 16(3), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2017.0106 /*ref*/Oppong, J. R. (2009). Globalization of communicable diseases. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Ed.), International encyclopedia of human geography (pp.209-213). Oxford: Elsevier. /*ref*/Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2005). Normas de Comunicación de brotes epidémicos de la OMS. Ginebra: OMS. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/69370/1/WHO_CDS_2005_28_spa.pdf?ua=1 /*ref*/Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2009). Preparación y respuesta ante una pandemia de influenza. Programa Mundial de la Salud. Ginebra: OMS. http://www.who.int/csr/swine_flu/Preparacion_Pand_ESP.pdf /*ref*/Orso, D., Federici, N., Copetti, R., Vetrugno, L., & Bove, T. (2020). Infodemic and the spread of fake news in the COVID-19-era. European Journal of Emergency Medicine, 27(5), 327-328. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000713 /*ref*/Otway, H., & Wynne, B. (1989). Risk Communication: Paradigm and Paradox. Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, 9(2), 141-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1989.tb01232.x /*ref*/Parks, W., & Lloyd, L. (2004). Planificación de la movilización y comunicación social para la prevención y el control del dengue. Guía paso a paso. OMS/WMC/OPS/TDR. Ginebra: OMS-OPS. https://www.who.int/tdr/publications/documents/planificacion_dengue.pdf /*ref*/Parmer, J., Baur, C., Eroglu, D., Lubell, K., Prue, C., Reynolds, B., & Weaver, J. (2016). Crisis and emergency risk messaging in mass media news stories: Is the public getting the information they need to protect their health? Health Communication, 31(10), 1215–1222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2015.1049728 /*ref*/Paulik, L. B., Keenan, R. E., & Durda, J. L. (2020). The Case for Effective Risk Communication: Lessons from a Global Pandemic. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 16(5), 552-554. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4312. /*ref*/Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N. J. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1178-1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006 /*ref*/Pidgeon, N., Kasperson, R., & Slovic, P. (Eds.). (2003). The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550461 /*ref*/Procopio, C. H., & Procopio, S. T. (2007). Do you know what it means to miss New Orleans? Internet communication, geographic community, and social capital in crisis. Journal of applied communication research, 35(1), 67-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880601065722 /*ref*/Reuter, C., & Kaufhold, M. A. (2018). Fifteen years of social media in emergencies: a retrospective review and future directions for crisis informatics. Journal of contingencies and crisis management, 26(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12196 /*ref*/Reynolds, B., & Seeger, M. W. (2005). Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model. Journal of Health Communication, 10(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730590904571 /*ref*/Roche, J., & Muskavitch, M. (2003). Limited precision in print media communication of West Nile virus risks. Science Communication, 24(3), 353-365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547002250300 /*ref*/Rogers, E.M. (1994). A history of communication study: A biographical approach. Free Press. /*ref*/Saliou, P. (1994). Crisis communication in the event of a flu pandemic. European journal of epidemiology, 10, 515–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01719693. /*ref*/Sandell, T., Sebar, B., & Harris, N. (2013). Framing risk: communication messages in the Australian and Swedish print media surrounding the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Scandinavian journal of public health, 41(8), 860–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494813498158 /*ref*/Segado-Boj, F. (2020). Research on social media and journalism (2003-2017): a bibliometric and content review. Transinformação, 32, e180096. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-9865202032e180096 /*ref*/Smith, R. D. (2006). Responding to global infectious disease outbreaks: lessons from SARS on the role of risk perception, communication and management. Social science & medicine (1982), 63(12), 3113–3123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.004 /*ref*/Soós, S., & Kiss, A. (2020). Informetrics and the study of science–society communications: a bibliometric scoping review. Scientometrics, 124, 825–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03444-2 /*ref*/Strekalova, Y. A. (2017). Health Risk Information Engagement and Amplification on Social Media. Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 44(2), 332–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198116660310 /*ref*/Tai, Z., & Sun, T. (2007). Media dependencies in a changing media environment: The case of the 2003 SARS epidemic in China. New media & society, 9(6), 987-1009. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807082691 /*ref*/Thirlaway, K., & Heggs, D. A. (2005). Interpreting risk messages: Women's responses to a health story. Health Risk & Society, 7 (2), 107-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698570500108677 /*ref*/Thompson, B., Mazer, J. P., Payne, H. J., Jerome, A. M., Kirby, E. G., & Pfohl, W. (2017). Social media and active shooter events: A school crisis communication challenge. Qualitative research reports in communication, 18(1), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17459435.2016.1247111 /*ref*/Toppenberg-Pejcic, D., Noyes, J., Allen, T., Alexander, N., Vanderford, M., & Gamhewage, G. (2019). Emergency risk communication: Lessons learned from a rapid review of recent gray literature on Ebola, Zika, and yellow fever. Health Communication, 34(4), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1405488 /*ref*/Ulmer, R. R., Seeger, M., & Sellnow, T. L. (2007). Post-Crisis Communication and Renewal: Expanding the Parameters of Post-Crisis Discourse. Public Relations Review, 33(2), 130-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.015 /*ref*/Urbina-Medina, H., Noguera Brizuela, D., Levy Mizhary, J., Carrizo, J., & Betancourt, A. (2016). Comunicación efectiva y ética en casos de epidemias y pandemias. Archivos Venezolanos de Puericultura y Pediatría, 79(4), 113-117. /*ref*/Vaughan, E., & Tinker, T. (2009). Effective Health Risk Communication about Pandemic Influenza for Vulnerable Populations. American Journal of Public Health, 99(S2), S324-S332. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.162537 /*ref*/Veil, S., Reynolds, B., Sellnow, T. L., & Seeger, M. W. (2008). CERC as a theoretical framework for research and practice. Health promotion practice, 9(4 Suppl), 26S–34S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839908322113 /*ref*/Wilder-Smith, A., Chiew, C. J., & Lee, V. J. (2020). Can we contain the COVID-19 outbreak with the same measures as for SARS?. The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 20(5), e102–e107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30129-8 /*ref*/Wurz, A., Nurn, U., & Ekdahl, K. (2013). Enhancing the role of health communication in the prevention of infectious diseases. Journal of Health Communication, 18(2), 1566–1571. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.840698 /*ref*/Xiao, Y., Tang, S., & Wu, J. (2015). Media impact switching surface during an infectious disease outbreak. Scientific reports, 5, 7838. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07838 /*ref*/Xie, L., Chen, Z., Wang, H., Zheng, C., & Jiang, J. (2020). Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis of Scientific Publications on Atlantoaxial Spine Surgery Based on Web of Science and VOSviewer. World neurosurgery, 137, 435–442.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.171 /*ref*/Zeta de Pozo, R. (2020). Editorial. Revista de Comunicación, 19(2), 5-6. https://doi.org/10.26441/RC19.2-2020-E1 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2021 Revista de Comunicación http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Derechos de autor 2021 Revista de Comunicación http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html application/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Piura. Facultad de Comunicación |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidad de Piura. Facultad de Comunicación |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Comunicación; Vol 20 No 1 (2021); 175-196 Revista de Comunicación; Vol. 20 Núm. 1 (2021); 175-196 2227-1465 1684-0933 reponame:Revista UDEP - Revista de Comunicación instname:Universidad de Piura instacron:UDEP |
reponame_str |
Revista UDEP - Revista de Comunicación |
collection |
Revista UDEP - Revista de Comunicación |
instname_str |
Universidad de Piura |
instacron_str |
UDEP |
institution |
UDEP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
-
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mail@mail.com |
_version_ |
1701295320222138368 |
spelling |
Evolution and trends in communication research about epidemics and pandemics at the international levelEvolución y tendencias de la investigación en comunicación sobre epidemias y pandemias en el ámbito internacionalOrtiz Núñez, RoelvisStable Rodríguez, YudaylyCommunication research in times of epidemics and pandemics is an important factor in prevention, treatment and recovery. The study presented analyzes the behavior of communication research about epidemics and pandemics through the scientific production registered in the Scopus database. Indicators are used to assess general publication trends at the country, institutional, author, journal and article level. The prevailing themes and their evolution over time are examined, as well as the evolution in the groups and associated research fronts. The results show a trend towards the growth of publications with a higher concentration in 2020. The number of publications by countries, institutions, authors and journals is discrete, therefore, it is an area of knowledge that requires greater scientific research and international collaboration. Five major thematic groups, main emerging research focuses, related to health communication during epidemics, social attitudes towards health, communication during influenza A H1N1 and the COVID-19 pandemic, and epidemiological information on social networks were identified. The critical points of research in the field during the 30 years recorded in the Scopus database allow us to infer that communication about epidemics and pandemics should become the focus of research in the area of risk communication in the near futureLa investigación sobre comunicación en tiempos de epidemias y pandemias constituye un factor trascendental en la prevención, tratamiento y recuperación. El estudio que se presenta analiza el comportamiento de la investigación en comunicación sobre epidemias y pandemias a través de la producción científica registrada en la base de datos Scopus. Se emplean indicadores para evaluar las tendencias generales de publicación a nivel de país, instituciones, autores, revistas y artículos. Se examinan los temas preponderantes y su evolución temporal, así como, la evolución en los grupos y frentes de investigación asociados. Los resultados muestran una tendencia al crecimiento de publicaciones con una mayor concentración en el 2020. El número de publicaciones por países, instituciones, autores y revistas es discreto, por lo que, es un área de conocimientos que requiere mayor investigación científica y colaboración internacional. Se identificaron 5 grandes grupos temáticos, principales focos emergentes de investigación, relacionados con la comunicación de salud durante epidemias, las actitudes sociales hacia la salud, la comunicación durante la influenza A H1N1 y la pandemia COVID-19 y la información epidemiológica en redes sociales. Los puntos críticos de investigación en el campo durante los 30 años registrados en la base de datos Scopus permiten inferir, que la comunicación sobre epidemias y pandemias debe convertirse en foco de la investigación en el área de comunicación de riesgos en un futuro próximo.Universidad de Piura. Facultad de Comunicación2021-03-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticle evaluated by pairstextArtículo evaluado por parestextoapplication/pdftext/htmlapplication/xmlhttps://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/215210.26441/RC20.1-2021-A10Revista de Comunicación; Vol 20 No 1 (2021); 175-196Revista de Comunicación; Vol. 20 Núm. 1 (2021); 175-1962227-14651684-0933reponame:Revista UDEP - Revista de Comunicacióninstname:Universidad de Piurainstacron:UDEPspahttps://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/2152/1995https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/2152/2022https://revistadecomunicacion.com/article/view/2152/2023/*ref*/Alaszewski, A., & Brown, P. (2007). Risk, uncertainty and knowledge. Health, Risk & Society, 9(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570601183033/*ref*/Alfredo Duro, E., Angélica Sotomayor, M., Czubaj, F., Cardozo de Martínez, C.A., Cristina Gubert , I., López Dávila, L.M., Adrián Torres, F., Benites Estupiñan, E.M., Vergès de López, C., Cudeiro, P., Rueda Castro, L. & Sorokin, P. (2018). El impacto social de la comunicación en las epidemias: perspectivas bioéticas y de salud pública. Revista Iberoamericana de Bioética, 7, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.14422/rib.i07.y2018.007/*ref*/Allahverdipour, H. (2020). Global Challenge of Health Communication: Infodemia in the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic. Journal of Education and Community Health, 7(2), 65-67. https://doi.org/10.29252/jech.7.2.65/*ref*/Andreu-Sánchez, C. y Martín-Pascual, M. A. (2020). Fake images of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in the communication of information at the beginning of the first Covid-19 pandemic. El profesional de la información, 29(3), e290309. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.09/*ref*/Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4):959-975. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007/*ref*/Aria, M., Misuraca, M., & Spano, M. (2020). Mapping the evolution of social research and data science on 30 years of Social Indicators Research. Social Indicators Research, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02281-3./*ref*/Arroyave-Cabrera, J., Repiso-Caballero, R., & González-Pardo, R. (2020). La investigación en Comunicación en Colombia vista desde Web of Science. Revista de Comunicación, 19(2), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.26441/RC19.2-2020-A2/*ref*/Ataguba, O. A. y Ataguba, J. E. (2020). Social determinants of health: the role of effective communication in the COVID-19 pandemic in developing countries. Global Health Action, 13(1):1788263. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1788263./*ref*/Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019/*ref*/Baladrón-Pazos, A.J., Manchado-Pérez, B., & Correyero-Ruiz, B. (2017). Estudio bibliométrico sobre la investigación en publicidad en España: temáticas, investigadores, redes y centros de producción (1980-2015). Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 40 (2): e170. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2017.2.1411/*ref*/Bedford, J., Farrar, J., Ihekweazu, C., Kang, G., Koopmans, M., & Nkengasong, J. (2019). A new twenty-first century science for effective epidemic response. Nature 575, 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1717-y/*ref*/Bellón Saameño, J. A., & Martínez Cañabate, T. (2001). La investigación en comunicación y salud. Una perspectiva nacional e internacional desde el análisis bibliométrico [Research into communication and health. A Spanish and international perspective through bibliometric analysis]. Atencion primaria, 27(7), 452–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0212-6567(01)78835-x/*ref*/Böl, G. F. (2016). Risk communication in times of crisis: Pitfalls and challenges in ensuring preparedness instead of hysterics. EMBO reports, 17(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201541678/*ref*/Brennan, B., & Gutiérrez, V. (2011). Guía para elaborar la estrategia de comunicación de riesgos. Washington, D.C.: OPS. http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=14526&Itemid=270&lang=en/*ref*/Budhwar, P., & Cumming, D. (2020). New Directions in Management Research and Communication: Lessons from the COVID‐19 Pandemic. British Journal of Management, 31(3):441-443. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12426/*ref*/Burton-Jeangros, C. (2019). Epidemics and risk communication: Why are lessons not learned? Managing the global health response to epidemics. New York: Routledge./*ref*/Castillo, A., & Carretón, M.C. (2010). Investigación en Comunicación. Estudio bibliométrico de las Revistas de Comunicación en España. Comunicación y Sociedad, 23(2), 289-327./*ref*/Castillo, A., Peña, V., & Mañas, S. (2014). Revista de Comunicación en España. Una aproximación histórica. Historia y Comunicación Social, 19, 621-630. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_HICS.2014.v19.45053/*ref*/Covello, V. T., Peters, R., Wojtecki, J., & Hyde, R. (2001). Risk communication, the West Nile virus epidemic, and bioterrorism: responding to the commnication challenges posed by the intentional or unintentional release of a pathogen in an urban setting. Journal of Urban Health, 78(2), 382-91. https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/78.2.382/*ref*/Covello, V. T., & Sandman, P. M. (2001). Risk communication: evolution and revolution. In A. Wolbarst (Ed.), Solutions to an environment in peril (pp.164-178). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press./*ref*/Cummings, L. (2009). Emerging Infectious Diseases: Coping with Uncertainty. Argumentation, 23, 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-008-9116-9/*ref*/Derviş, H. (2019). Bibliometric Analysis using Bibliometrix an R Package. Journal of Scientometric Research, 8(3), 156-160. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.8.3.32./*ref*/De Vries, M. S. (2016). Framing crises: response patterns to explosions in fireworks factories. Administration & Society, 36(5), 594–614. https://doi.or/10.1177/0095399704268622/*ref*/Fraustino, J. D., Liu, B. F., & Jin, Y. (2017). Social media during disasters: A research synthesis and road map. In L. Austin & Y. Jin, (Ed.), Social media and crisis communication (pp.283-295) New York, NY: Routledge./*ref*/Freimuth, V., Linnan, H. W., & Potter, P. (2000). Communicating the threat of emerging infections to the public. Emerging infectious diseases, 6(4), 337–347. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0604.000403/*ref*/Frewer, L. J., Hunt, S., Brennan, M., Kuznesof, S., Ness, M., & Ritson, C. (2003) The views of scientific experts on how the public conceptualize uncertainty. Journal of Risk Research, 6(1), 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366987032000047815/*ref*/Frewer, L. J., Miles, S., Brennan, M., Kuznesof, S., Ness, M., & Ritson, C. (2002). Public preferences for informed choice under conditions of risk uncertainty. Public Understanding of Science, 11(4), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/11/4/304/*ref*/Glik, D. C. (2007). Risk communication for public health emergencies. Annual review of public health, 28, 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144123/*ref*/Goerlandt, F.; Li, J.; & Reniers, G. (2020). The Landscape of Risk Communication Research: A Scientometric Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 3255. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093255/*ref*/Gómez Castro, L. (2017). La comunicación de riesgo en salud: aspectos teóricos y metodológicos para el control de emergencias públicas sanitarias. MEDISAN, 21(12), 3386-3399. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1029-30192017001200013&lng=es&tlng=es./*ref*/González, M. A. (2019). Fake News: desinformación en la era de la sociedad de la información. Ámbitos. Revista Internacional de Comunicación, 45, 29-52. https://doi.org/10.12795/Ambitos.2019.i45.03/*ref*/Gui, X., Wang, Y., Kou, Y., Reynolds, T. L., Chen, Y., Mei, Q., & Zheng, K. (2018). Understanding the Patterns of Health Information Dissemination on Social Media during the Zika Outbreak. Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 820–829./*ref*/Guttman, N. (2000). Public Health Communication Interventions: Values and Ethical Dilemmas. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications./*ref*/Health Protection Network. (2008). Communicating with the public about health risks. Glasgow: Health Protection Scotland./*ref*/Holmes, B.J. (2008). Communicating aboutemerging infectious disease: the impor-tance of research. Health, Risk & Society, 10, 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570802166431/*ref*/Horlick-Jonesa, T., & Sime, J. (2004). Living on the border: knowledge, risk and transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36(4), 441-456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.006/*ref*/Househ, M. (2016). Communicating Ebola through social media and electronic news media outlets: A cross-sectional study. Health informatics journal, 22(3), 470–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458214568037/*ref*/Hugh Feeley, T. (2008). A Bibliometric Analysis of Communication Journals from 2002 to 2005. Human Communication Research, 34(3), 505-520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00330.x/*ref*/Jin, Y., Liu, B. F., & Austin, L. L. (2014). Examining the Role of Social Media in Effective Crisis Management: The Effects of Crisis Origin, Information Form, and Source on Publics’ Crisis Responses. Communication Research, 41(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211423918/*ref*/Johnson, B. (1999). Ethical issues in risk communication: Continuing the discussion. Risk analysis, 19, 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00411.x/*ref*/Jones, S., Waters, L., Holland, O., Bevins, J., & Iverson, D. (2010). Developing pandemic communication strategies: preparation without panic. Journal of Business Research, 63(2), 126-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.02.009/*ref*/Kotalik, J. (2005). Preparing for an influenza pandemic: ethical issues. Bioethics, 19(4), 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00453.x/*ref*/Laajalahti, Hyvärinen & Vos. (2016). Crisis communication competence in co-producing safety with citizen groups. Social sciences, 5(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci5010013/*ref*/Lin, L., McCloud, R. F., Bigman, C. A., & Viswanath, K. (2016). Tuning in and catching on? Examination of the relationship between pandemic communication and awareness and knowledge of MERS in the USA. Journal of Public Health, 39(2), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdw028./*ref*/Liwei, Z., Li, H. & Chen, K. (2020). Effective Risk Communication for Public Health Emergency: Reflection on the COVID-19 (2019-nCoV) Outbreak in Wuhan, China. Healthcare, 8(64). https:doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8010064/*ref*/Lofstedt, R. (2003). Risk communication: pitfalls and promises. European review, 11(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1017/S106279870300036X/*ref*/Lofstedt, R. (2005). Risk Management in Post-Trust Societies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan./*ref*/Lundgren, R., & McMakin, A. (2004). Risk Communication: A Handbook for Communicating Environmental, Safety, and Health Risks. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press./*ref*/Macias, W., Hilyard, K., & Freimuth, V. (2009). Blog functions as risk and crisis communication during hurricane Katrina. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 15(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01490.x/*ref*/Marí-Sáez, V., & Ceballos-Castro, G. (2015). Análisis bibliométrico sobre “Comunicación, Desarrollo y Cambio Social” en las diez primeras revistas de Comunicación de España. Cuadernos.Info, (37), 201-212. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.37.828/*ref*/Mheidly, N., & Fares, J. (2020). Health communication research in the Arab world: A bibliometric analysis. Integrated Healthcare Journal, 2, e000011. https://doi.org/10.1136/ihj-2019-000011/*ref*/Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5/*ref*/Montero-Díaz, J., Cobo, M., Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Segado-Boj, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018). A science mapping analysis of ‘Communication’ WoS subject category (1980-2013). Comunicar, 55, 81-91. https://doi.org/10.3916/C55-2018-08/*ref*/Moreno, Á., Fuentes-Lara, C., & Navarro, C. (2020). Covid-19 communication management in Spain: Exploring the effect of information-seeking behavior and message reception in public’s evaluation. El profesional de la información, 29(4), e290402. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.jul.02/*ref*/Moscadelli, A., Albora, G., Biamonte, M. A., Giorgetti, D., Innocenzio, M., Paoli, S., Lorini, C., Bonanni, P., & Bonaccorsi, G. (2020). Fake News and Covid-19 in Italy: Results of a Quantitative Observational Study. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(16), 5850. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165850/*ref*/National Research Council (US). (1989). Committee on Risk Perception and Communication. Improving Risk Comunication. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press (US)./*ref*/Oh, S. H., Paek, H. J., & Hove, T. (2015). Cognitive and emotional dimensions of perceived risk characteristics, genre-specific media effects, and risk perceptions: The case of H1N1 influenza in South Korea. Asian Journal of Communication, 25, 14–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2014.989240/*ref*/Ophir, Y. (2018). Coverage of Epidemics in American Newspapers Through the Lens of the Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication Framework. Health security, 16(3), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2017.0106/*ref*/Oppong, J. R. (2009). Globalization of communicable diseases. In R. Kitchin & N. Thrift (Ed.), International encyclopedia of human geography (pp.209-213). Oxford: Elsevier./*ref*/Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2005). Normas de Comunicación de brotes epidémicos de la OMS. Ginebra: OMS. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/69370/1/WHO_CDS_2005_28_spa.pdf?ua=1/*ref*/Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2009). Preparación y respuesta ante una pandemia de influenza. Programa Mundial de la Salud. Ginebra: OMS. http://www.who.int/csr/swine_flu/Preparacion_Pand_ESP.pdf/*ref*/Orso, D., Federici, N., Copetti, R., Vetrugno, L., & Bove, T. (2020). Infodemic and the spread of fake news in the COVID-19-era. European Journal of Emergency Medicine, 27(5), 327-328. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000713/*ref*/Otway, H., & Wynne, B. (1989). Risk Communication: Paradigm and Paradox. Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, 9(2), 141-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1989.tb01232.x/*ref*/Parks, W., & Lloyd, L. (2004). Planificación de la movilización y comunicación social para la prevención y el control del dengue. Guía paso a paso. OMS/WMC/OPS/TDR. Ginebra: OMS-OPS. https://www.who.int/tdr/publications/documents/planificacion_dengue.pdf/*ref*/Parmer, J., Baur, C., Eroglu, D., Lubell, K., Prue, C., Reynolds, B., & Weaver, J. (2016). Crisis and emergency risk messaging in mass media news stories: Is the public getting the information they need to protect their health? Health Communication, 31(10), 1215–1222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2015.1049728/*ref*/Paulik, L. B., Keenan, R. E., & Durda, J. L. (2020). The Case for Effective Risk Communication: Lessons from a Global Pandemic. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 16(5), 552-554. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4312./*ref*/Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N. J. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1178-1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006/*ref*/Pidgeon, N., Kasperson, R., & Slovic, P. (Eds.). (2003). The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550461/*ref*/Procopio, C. H., & Procopio, S. T. (2007). Do you know what it means to miss New Orleans? Internet communication, geographic community, and social capital in crisis. Journal of applied communication research, 35(1), 67-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880601065722/*ref*/Reuter, C., & Kaufhold, M. A. (2018). Fifteen years of social media in emergencies: a retrospective review and future directions for crisis informatics. Journal of contingencies and crisis management, 26(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12196/*ref*/Reynolds, B., & Seeger, M. W. (2005). Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model. Journal of Health Communication, 10(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730590904571/*ref*/Roche, J., & Muskavitch, M. (2003). Limited precision in print media communication of West Nile virus risks. Science Communication, 24(3), 353-365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547002250300/*ref*/Rogers, E.M. (1994). A history of communication study: A biographical approach. Free Press./*ref*/Saliou, P. (1994). Crisis communication in the event of a flu pandemic. European journal of epidemiology, 10, 515–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01719693./*ref*/Sandell, T., Sebar, B., & Harris, N. (2013). Framing risk: communication messages in the Australian and Swedish print media surrounding the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Scandinavian journal of public health, 41(8), 860–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494813498158/*ref*/Segado-Boj, F. (2020). Research on social media and journalism (2003-2017): a bibliometric and content review. Transinformação, 32, e180096. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-9865202032e180096/*ref*/Smith, R. D. (2006). Responding to global infectious disease outbreaks: lessons from SARS on the role of risk perception, communication and management. Social science & medicine (1982), 63(12), 3113–3123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.004/*ref*/Soós, S., & Kiss, A. (2020). Informetrics and the study of science–society communications: a bibliometric scoping review. Scientometrics, 124, 825–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03444-2/*ref*/Strekalova, Y. A. (2017). Health Risk Information Engagement and Amplification on Social Media. Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 44(2), 332–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198116660310/*ref*/Tai, Z., & Sun, T. (2007). Media dependencies in a changing media environment: The case of the 2003 SARS epidemic in China. New media & society, 9(6), 987-1009. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807082691/*ref*/Thirlaway, K., & Heggs, D. A. (2005). Interpreting risk messages: Women's responses to a health story. Health Risk & Society, 7 (2), 107-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698570500108677/*ref*/Thompson, B., Mazer, J. P., Payne, H. J., Jerome, A. M., Kirby, E. G., & Pfohl, W. (2017). Social media and active shooter events: A school crisis communication challenge. Qualitative research reports in communication, 18(1), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17459435.2016.1247111/*ref*/Toppenberg-Pejcic, D., Noyes, J., Allen, T., Alexander, N., Vanderford, M., & Gamhewage, G. (2019). Emergency risk communication: Lessons learned from a rapid review of recent gray literature on Ebola, Zika, and yellow fever. Health Communication, 34(4), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1405488/*ref*/Ulmer, R. R., Seeger, M., & Sellnow, T. L. (2007). Post-Crisis Communication and Renewal: Expanding the Parameters of Post-Crisis Discourse. Public Relations Review, 33(2), 130-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.015/*ref*/Urbina-Medina, H., Noguera Brizuela, D., Levy Mizhary, J., Carrizo, J., & Betancourt, A. (2016). Comunicación efectiva y ética en casos de epidemias y pandemias. Archivos Venezolanos de Puericultura y Pediatría, 79(4), 113-117./*ref*/Vaughan, E., & Tinker, T. (2009). Effective Health Risk Communication about Pandemic Influenza for Vulnerable Populations. American Journal of Public Health, 99(S2), S324-S332. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.162537/*ref*/Veil, S., Reynolds, B., Sellnow, T. L., & Seeger, M. W. (2008). CERC as a theoretical framework for research and practice. Health promotion practice, 9(4 Suppl), 26S–34S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839908322113/*ref*/Wilder-Smith, A., Chiew, C. J., & Lee, V. J. (2020). Can we contain the COVID-19 outbreak with the same measures as for SARS?. The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 20(5), e102–e107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30129-8/*ref*/Wurz, A., Nurn, U., & Ekdahl, K. (2013). Enhancing the role of health communication in the prevention of infectious diseases. Journal of Health Communication, 18(2), 1566–1571. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.840698/*ref*/Xiao, Y., Tang, S., & Wu, J. (2015). Media impact switching surface during an infectious disease outbreak. Scientific reports, 5, 7838. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07838/*ref*/Xie, L., Chen, Z., Wang, H., Zheng, C., & Jiang, J. (2020). Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis of Scientific Publications on Atlantoaxial Spine Surgery Based on Web of Science and VOSviewer. World neurosurgery, 137, 435–442.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.171/*ref*/Zeta de Pozo, R. (2020). Editorial. Revista de Comunicación, 19(2), 5-6. https://doi.org/10.26441/RC19.2-2020-E1Derechos de autor 2021 Revista de Comunicaciónhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-05-31T17:20:14Zmail@mail.com - |
score |
13.958958 |
Nota importante:
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la institución que gestiona el repositorio institucional donde esta contenido este documento o set de datos. El CONCYTEC no se hace responsable por los contenidos (publicaciones y/o datos) accesibles a través del Repositorio Nacional Digital de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de Acceso Abierto (ALICIA).